中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 18-29.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0291

;

• Bibliometrics • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Progress of Library and Information Science During the 13th Five-year Plan:Analysis on Funded Papers

ZHAO Rongying1,2,3, CHANG Ruru1,3,*, WANG Xiaoyu1,3, ZHANG Zhaoyang1,3   

  1. 1. Research Center for Chinese Science Evaluation, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    2. Center for Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    3. School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072
  • Received:2021-04-21 Online:2021-06-05 Published:2021-06-15

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Science funding provides financial support for academic institutions, researchers and research projects, and at the same time plays a guiding role in the development of scientific innovation. The research of funded papers contributes to the development of the discipline and is of great significance to the encouragement and support of researchers. [Method/Process] Based on the funded papers published in Chinese journals and foreign journals in the field of library and information science (LIS) during the "13th Five-Year Plan" period, this paper analyzes from the perspectives of the time distribution of papers issued, research output of different types foundations and the research topics. [Results/Conclusions] The number of funded papers published in Chinese journals in LIS from 2016 to 2020 has decreased year by year, but the number of funded papers published in foreign journals has slowly increased year by year; for funded papers published in Chinese journal during the "13th Five-Year Plan" period, provincial (municipal) foundations funded papers are more outstanding, and National Natural Science Foundation funded papers are more notable for the number and effects of the funded papers in foreign journals; the funded papers in Chinese journals show a great impact on library services, changes and data, digital resource construction and university libraries; while funded papers in foreign journals pay more attention to social media, theme models, scientometrics and library construction.

Key words: the 13th Five-Year Plan, library and information science (LIS), academic progress, funded paper

CLC Number: 

  • G255
[1] VARDAKAS K Z, TSOPANAKIS G, POULOPOULOU A, et al.An analysis of factors contributing to PubMed's growth[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2015, 9(3): 592-617.
[2] WANG J, SHAPIRA P.Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: The case of nanotechnology[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(3): 563-586.
[3] ZHAO S X, YU S, TAN A M, et al.Global pattern of science funding in economics[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(1): 463-479.
[4] TAHMOORESNEJAD L, BEAUDRY C, SCHIFFAUEROVA A.The role of public funding in nanotechnology scientific production: Where Canada stands in comparison to the united states[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1): 753-787.
[5] 韦忠明. 2006-2009年《图书馆论坛》基金资助论文分析——继1993-2005年该刊基金资助论文的再分析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2011, 31(1): 52-54, 175.
WEI Z M.Analysis of the papers funded by the "library forum" from 2006 to 2009 - Following the re-analysis of the papers funded by the journal from 1993 to 2005[J]. Library forum, 2011, 31(1): 52-54, 175.
[6] 孙仙阁. 《情报科学》1998-2008年基金资助论文定量分析[J]. 情报科学, 2010, 28(4): 545-549.
SUN X G.Quantitative analysis of funded papers in "information science" from 1998 to 2008[J]. Information science, 2010, 28(4): 545-549.
[7] ZHAO D.Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: a case study of the library and information science field[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2): 293-306.
[8] 赵蓉英, 赵浚吟, 陈必坤. 透视“图书馆、情报与档案管理”学科的研究主题与趋势——以2001-2012年国家科学基金为研究视角[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014, 37(2): 1-5.
ZHAO R Y, ZHAO J Y, CHEN B K.Perspectives on the research topics and trends of the subject of "library, information and archives management" - From the perspective of the national science foundation of china from 2001 to 2012[J]. Information theory and practice,2014, 37(2): 1-5.
[9] 赵蓉英, 赵浚吟, 陈必坤. 我国“图书馆、情报与档案管理”学科的研究现状分析——以2001-2012年国家基金项目为视角[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(7): 106-112.
ZHAO R Y, ZHAO J Y, CHEN B K.Analysis of the research status of the subject of "library, information and archives management" in my country - From the perspective of the national fund projects from 2001 to 2012[J]. Information magazine, 2013, 32(7): 106-112.
[10] 赵来娟, 郭凤娇, 赵蓉英. APEC成员计算机科学领域基金论文计量分析[J]. 现代情报, 2015, 35(7): 112-118.
ZHAO L J, GUO F J, ZHAO R Y.Quantitative analysis of APEC member computer science fund papers[J]. Modern information, 2015, 35(7): 112-118.
[11] IDA T, FUKUZAWA N.Effects of large-scale research funding programs: A Japanese case study[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94.
[12] RIGBY J, JULIAN K.On the horns of a dilemma: Does more funding for research lead to more research or a waste of resources that calls for optimization of researcher portfolios? An analysis using funding acknowledgement data[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1067-1075.
[13] 张诗乐, 盖双双, 刘雪立. 国家自然科学基金资助的效果——基于论文产出的文献计量学评价[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(4): 507-515.
ZHANG S L, GAI S S, LIU X L.The effect of the national natural science foundation of China-A bibliometric evaluation based on the output of papers[J]. Studies in science of science, 2015, 33(4): 507-515.
[14] 戚尔鹏, 叶鹰. 基础学科论文的基金资助引用优势研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2015, 33(6): 11-16.
QI E P, YE Y.Research on the citation advantages of funding funds for papers in basic subjects[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2015, 33(6): 11-16.
[15] 刘睿远, 刘雪立, 王璞, 等. 基金论文比作为科技期刊评价指标的合理性——基于SCI数据库中眼科学期刊的实证研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2013, 24(3): 472-476.
LIU R Y, LIU X L, WANG P, et al.The rationality of fund paper ratio as an evaluation index for scientific and technological journals - An empirical study based on ophthalmology journals in SCI database[J]. Research on Chinese journals of science and technology, 2013, 24(3): 472-476.
[16] 王谦, 林萍, 孙昌朋, 等. 医学期刊基金论文比与影响因子等指标的关系及影响因素[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015, 26(6): 634-638.
WANG Q, LIN P, SUN C P, et al.The relationship between the ra-tio of funded papers in medical journals and the impact factors and other indicators and influencing factors[J]. China science and tech-nology journal research, 2015, 26(6): 634-638.
[17] 徐晶, 王昱苏, 田慧, 等. 基金论文比作为期刊评级体系指标的探讨——基于2007-2011年口腔医学类期刊基金论文的引用情况分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2014, 25(7): 949-953.
XU J, WANG Y S, TIAN H, et al.Discussion on the ratio of funded papers as an index of the journal rating system - Based on the funded papers of stomatological journals from 2007 to 2011 citation analysis[J]. Journal of Chinese science and technology journals, 2014, 25(7): 949-953.
[18] 中国知网[EB/OL]. [2020-04-25].https://www.cnki.net/.
China national knowledge infrastructure[EB/OL].[2020-04-25].https://www.cnki.net/.
[19] Web of Science[EB/OL]. [2020-04-26]. http://iras.lib.whu.edu.cn:8080/rwt/WOS/https/MFZHA63PP7TXE55GNNYG875MMWTGP3JPMNYXN/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=C2bFZfwpsy1BGxFAc2n&preferencesSaved=.
[1] QIAN Lei, HONG Qiulan. Practice and Enlightenment of the Industry-University-Research LIS Projects in iSchool Universities in the United States [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(8): 92-101.
[2] ZHANG Kun, ZHANG Li, CAO Long, ZHOU Li-ping. Quantitative Analysis on the Relevant Indicators of Funded Papers in Forestry University Journals [J]. , 2016, 28(1): 42-46.
[3] LIANG Zhi-sen, WANG Dan-xue, LI Xin-lai. Quantitative Analysis on the Funding Papers about Library and Information Science in China and U.S.A and U.K: Based on SCI-E and SSCI [J]. , 2015, 27(7): 70-75.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!