中文    English

Journal of library and information science in agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 5-14.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.25-0386

    Next Articles

Agent Technology and Its Applications in Scientific Research

QIAN Li, WANG Qianying, LIU Yi, ZHANG Yuanzhe, CHANG Zhijun   

  1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
  • Received:2025-04-15 Online:2025-05-05 Published:2025-08-10

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] Currently, large language models (LLMs) and agents have emerged as core technical paradigms in artificial intelligence, with their integration into scientific research scenarios holding profound significance for transforming research paradigms. Traditional scientific research is facing an increasing number of challenges such as inefficient literature searches, the processing of massive amounts of data, repetitive experimental tasks, and barriers to collaborative innovation. Agents, empowered by LLMs, offer a promising solution to these bottlenecks by enabling intelligent automation and adaptive collaboration across research workflows. Beyond basic task assistance, they play a pivotal role in facilitating knowledge fusion, accelerating breakthroughs in frontier areas, and reshaping traditional research models. This study aims to clarify the core techniques and applications of agents in scientific research, highlighting their transition from auxiliary tools to integral innovation partners, which is crucial for accelerating knowledge discovery, enhancing research efficiency, and promoting the shift toward intelligent and collaborative research models. [Method/Process] Employing an objective, inductive approach, this study thoroughly explains the core technical modules of agents including planning, perception, action, and memory, as well as the operational mechanisms of multi-agent collaboration. It also integrates an analysis of agent applications throughout the entire scientific research lifecycle. This analysis covers key scenarios including literature review and idea formulation, experimental planning and design, data processing and execution, result analysis and knowledge discovery, and research report composition. By analyzing the application value and existing limitations of agents, this study proposes prospects and recommendations for the application and development of agents in scientific research scenarios. [Results/Conclusions The findings reveal that LLM-driven agents are evolving from basic task executors to active participants in scientific discovery, demonstrating significant transformative potential throughout the entire research workflow. They facilitate more efficient information processing, smarter experimental design, and deeper knowledge integration, thereby redefining traditional research patterns. However, several challenges persist, including limitations in long-range reasoning capabilities, and underdeveloped ecosystem support. There are also ethical and security concerns, such as data privacy and academic integrity. To address these, future efforts should focus on strengthening intelligent computing infrastructure for scientific data, deepening collaborative development of domain-specific agents, establishing a unified open collaboration framework with standardized interfaces, and building "human-in-the-loop" hybrid systems and multiple evaluation mechanisms. These measures will enable agents to become core partners in scientific innovation, driving the transition of research paradigms toward greater intelligence and collaboration.

Key words: agents, large language model, scientific research service, AI4S, scientific research paradigm

CLC Number: 

  • G350

Fig.1

Core components of agents"

Fig.2

Lifecycle of scientific research scenario"

[1] YANG J, LI A, FARAJTABAR M, et al. Learning to incentivize other learning agents[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2020. .
[2] LAIRD J E, NEWELL A, ROSENBLOOM P S. SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence[J]. Artificial intelligence, 1987, 33(1): 1-64.
[3] WOOLDRIDGE M, JENNINGS N R. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice[J]. The knowledge engineering review, 1995, 10(2): 115-152.
[4] WANG L, MA C, FENG X Y, et al. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents[J]. Frontiers of computer science, 2024, 18(6): 186345.
[5] KHOT T, TRIVEDI H, FINLAYSON M, et al. Decomposed prompting: A modular approach for solving complex tasks[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2022. .
[6] YAO S, ZHAO J, YU D, et al. ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2022. .
[7] HOU X, YANG M, JIAO W, et al. CoAct: A global-local hierarchy for autonomous agent collaboration[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2024.
[8] DONGRE V, YANG X C, ACIKGOZ E C, et al. ReSpAct: Harmonizing reasoning, speaking, and acting towards building large language model-based conversational AI agents[J]. arXiv e-prints, 2024: arXiv: .
[9] PAN J B, ZHANG Y, ZHANG C, et al. DynaThink: Fast or slow? A dynamic decision-making framework for large language models[C]//Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Miami, Florida, USA. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: ACL, 2024: 14686-14695.
[10] LEANG J O J, GEMA A P, COHEN S B. CoMAT: Chain of mathematically annotated thought improves mathematical reasoning[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2024.
[11] SCHICK T, DWIVEDI-YU J, DESSÌ, et al. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools[J]. arXiv e-prints, 2023: arXiv: .
[12] DU Y, WEI F, ZHANG H. AnyTool: Self-reflective, hierarchical agents for large-scale api calls[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2024. .
[13] LIU X, PENG Z, YI X, et al. ToolNet: Connecting large language models with massive tools via tool graph[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2024. .
[14] MODARRESSI A, IMANI A, FAYYAZ M, et al. RET-LLM: Towards a general read-write memory for large language models[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2023. .
[15] HONG S, ZHUGE M, CHEN J, et al. MetaGPT: Meta programming for a multi-agent collaborative framework[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2023. .
[16] ANOKHIN P, SEMENOV N, SOROKIN A, et al. AriGraph: Learning knowledge graph world models with episodic memory for LLM agents[J]. arXiv e-prints, 2024: arXiv: .
[17] TRAN K, DAO D, NGUYEN M, et al. Multi-agent collaboration mechanisms: A survey of LLMs[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2025. .
[18] WU Q Y, BANSAL G, ZHANG J Y, et al. AutoGen: Enabling next-gen LLM applications via multi-agent conversation framework[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2023.
[19] HE Y, HUANG G, FENG P, et al. PaSa: An LLM agent for comprehensive academic paper search[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2025. .
[20] CHEN Z, LIU K, WANG Q, et al. MindSearch: Mimicking human minds elicits deep AI searcher[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2024. .
[21] SAMI M A, RASHEED Z, KEMELL K, et al. System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents: Concept and an empirical evaluation[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2024. .
[22] BAEK J, JAUHAR S K, CUCERZAN S, et al. ResearchAgent: Iterative research idea generation over scientific literature with large language models[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2024. .
[23] GOTTWEIS J, WENG W, DARYIN A, et al. Towards an AI co-scientist[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2025. .
[24] QU Y H, HUANG K X, COUSINS H, et al. CRISPR-GPT An LLM agent for automated design of gene-editing experiments[J]. bioRxiv, 2024: 2024.04.25.591003.
[25] NI B, BUEHLER M J. MechAgents: Large language model multi-agent collaborations can solve mechanics problems, generate new data, and integrate knowledge[J]. Extreme mechanics letters, 2024, 67: 102131.
[26] CHRIS L, CONG L, ROBERT T L, et al. The AI scientist: Towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:, 2024.
[27] XIN Q, KONG Q, JI H, et al. BioInformatics Agent (BIA): Unleashing the power of large language models to reshape bioinformatics workflow[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2024. .
[28] BRAN A M, COX S, SCHILTER O, et al. Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools[J]. Nature machine intelligence, 2024, 6(5): 525-535.
[29] GHAFAROLLAHI A, BUEHLER M J. ProtAgents: Protein discovery via large language model multi-agent collaborations combining physics and machine learning[J]. Digital discovery, 2024, 3(7): 1389-1409.
[30] XIAO Y, LIU J, ZHENG Y, et al. CellAgent: An LLM-driven multi-agent framework for automated single-cell data analysis[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2024. .
[31] SCHMIDGALL S, SU Y, WANG Z, et al. Agent laboratory: Using LLM agents as research assistants[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2025. .
[1] LIU Wei, ZHANG Lei, JI Ting, CHEN Xiaoyang. Shaping the Smart Libraries with AI: An Agent-based, Next-Generation Library Service Platform [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(5): 15-26.
[2] SANG Yuanyuan. Multimodal Learning Technology Aimed at Exploring the Innovative Path of Library Intelligence Service [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(3): 42-52.
[3] CAI Yiran, HU Zhengyin, LIU Chunjiang. Analysis of Progress in Data Mining of Scientific Literature Using Large Language Models [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(2): 4-22.
[4] Haoxian WANG, Ziming ZHOU, Feifei DING, Chengfu WEI. Digital Humanities & Large Language Models: Practice and Research in Semantic Retrieval of Ancient Documents [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(9): 89-101.
[5] Huaming LI. Opportunities and Challenges: The Use of ChatGPT in Enabling Library Knowledge Services [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(8): 96-105.
[6] JIANG Peng, REN Yan, ZHU Beiling. Exploration and Practice of Classification Indexing Combined with Large Language Models [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(5): 32-42.
[7] SHOU Jianqi. Towards Known Unknowns: GPT Large Language Models Empower Human-Centered Information Retrieval [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2023, 35(5): 16-26.
[8] GUO Pengrui, WEN Tingxiao. Research of the Impact of LLMs on Information Retrieval Systems and Users' Information Retrieval Behavior [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2023, 35(11): 13-22.
[9] SUN Tan, ZHANG Zhixiong, ZHOU Lihong, WANG Dongbo, ZHANG Hai, LI Baiyang, YONG Suhua, ZUO Wangmeng, YANG Guanglei. The Transformation and Observations of AI for Science (AI4S) Driven by Artificial Intelligence [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2023, 35(10): 4-32.
[10] ZHAO Ruixue, HUANG Yongwen, MA Weilu, DONG Wenjia, XIAN Guojian, SUN Tan. Insights and Reflections of the Impact of ChatGPT on Intelligent Knowledge Services in Libraries [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2023, 35(1): 29-38.
[11] JIANG Bo. Research on Digital Library's Reference Service Oriented to Data-intensive Research Paradigm [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2018, 30(9): 161-164.
[12] ZHANG Ling. The SWOT Analysis of Scientific Research Service in University Library——Taking the Library of China University of Political Science and Law as an Example [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2017, 29(7): 162-166.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!