中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 5-14.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.22-0481

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Open Science: Connotation of Open Innovation and Its Mechanism for Innovation Ecology

CHEN Xuefei1, HUANG Jinxia1,2, WANG Fang1   

  1. 1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2. Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
  • Received:2022-06-27 Online:2022-09-05 Published:2022-11-28

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Open science is shaping a new academic innovation ecology, aiming to promote open exchange and use of knowledge, emphasize open and cooperative research methods, and thus accelerate scientific innovation. Open innovation emphasizes the flow of knowledge across organizational boundaries. Both of them have obvious internal consistency and regard the free flow of knowledge as the driving factor of innovation. However, there are few studies on the relationship between open science and open innovation at present. They are often studied separately in the scientific research environment and the enterprise environment, ignoring the common role and integration of the two in the open innovation ecology. This paper aims to analyze the consistency of the connotation of open science and open innovation, study the mechanism of open science for innovation ecology, and provide reference for building an open science innovation ecology integrating open science and open innovation, as well as for developing open science governance for scientific and technological innovation. [Method/Process] First, based on the existing connotation of open science, this paper established the connotation analysis framework of "resource-process-subject-behavior" of open science, and put forward four key elements and principles of open science: "openness of scientific knowledge resources - transparency of research process - inclusiveness of participants - collaboration of research behavior". Then it de-constructed open innovation according to the connotation analysis framework of open science, and put forward four key elements of innovation knowledge resources, innovation process, innovation subject and innovation activities, as well as the principle of transparent and open innovation knowledge resources and innovation process, and value of co-creation based on the inclusiveness of innovation subject. Finally, according to the four principles of open science, the "Open Science Spectrum" was established to clarify the consistency and synergy of both sides from the perspective of openness. Besides, in order to understand the joint action mechanism of open science and open innovation in the innovation ecology, this paper analyzes the open science innovation mechanism in different innovation stages from the perspective of innovation process, including the open science mechanism in the open science research stage, the mechanism in the technology research and development stage, the citizen science mechanism in the social inclusion stage, and the responsible innovation mechanism covering the whole process of innovation. [Results/Conclusions] The innovation ecology of open science has come into being. Open science and open innovation have consistency in connotation and synergy in openness. Under the open science innovation ecology, open science plays a role in different stages of innovation. Explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge are open and flowing in different stages of innovation, accelerating open science innovation, open innovation, public innovation and responsible innovation. The inadequacy of this paper is that the relevant research is still at the theoretical level. For example, the spectrum of open science needs to be refined to an assessable and operable granularity, and the mechanism of open science for innovation ecology also needs more cases to verify. At the same time, based on this research, we need to further explore the governance mechanism of open science under the innovation system and the linkage strategy of science, industry, society and policy under the open innovation ecology.

Key words: open innovation, open science, innovation ecology, open sharing

CLC Number: 

  • G250.7
[1] Draft UNESCO recommendation on open science[EB/OL].[2021-11-21].https://en.unesco.org/science-sustainable-future/open-science/recommendation.
[2] EC. Horizon2020-Work programme 2018-2020[EB/OL]. (2020-09-17)[2020-09-10]. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018-2020/main/h2020-wp1820-swfs_en.pdf.
[3] 人民网. 中华人民共和国科学技术进步法[EB/OL]. (2021-12-24)[2022-02-21]. http://jl.people.com.cn/n2/2021/1227/c349771-35069147-2.html.
People's Network. Law of the People's Republic of China on Science and Technology Progress[EB/OL]. (2021-12-24)[2022-02-21]. http://jl.people.com.cn/n2/2021/1227/c349771-35069147-2.html.
[4] European commission. Open innovation, open science, open to the world - A vision for Europe[EB/OL]. (2016-05-30)[2019-12-20]. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/open-innovation-open-science-open-world-visioneurope.
[5] 黄金霞. 开放科学“突变”知识共享与知识利用的新生态[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(12): 4.
HUANG J X.New ecology of knowledge sharing and knowledge utilization in open science[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 4.
[6] National academies of sciences, engineering,medicine. Open science by design: Realizing a vision for 21st century research[M]. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018.
[7] VICENTE-SAEZ R, MARTINEZ-FUENTES C.Open science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition[J]. Journal of business research, 2018, 88: 428-436.
[8] UNESCO. Draft text of the UNESCO recommendation on open science[EB/OL].[2022-06-01]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378381.locale=en.
[9] 彭媛媛, 黄金霞, 陈雪飞, 等. 开放科学进程中的OA期刊发展:2017-2020年[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(12): 29-40.
PENG Y Y, HUANG J X, CHEN X F, et al.Open access journals' development in the open science process: 2017-2020[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 29-40.
[10] 陈秀娟, 张志强. 开放科学的驱动因素、发展优势与障碍[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(6): 77-84.
CHEN X J, ZHANG Z Q.The driving factors, advantages and obstacles of the open science development[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018, 62(6): 77-84.
[11] DAVID P A.Common agency contracting and the emergence of "open science" institutions[J]. The American economic review, 1998, 88(2): 15-21.
[12] GOLD E R.The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science[J]. Research policy, 2021, 50(5): 104226.
[13] VICENTE-SAEZ R, GUSTAFSSON R, MARTINEZ-FUENTES C.Opening up science for a sustainable world: An expansive normative structure of open science in the digital era[J]. Science and public policy, 2021, 48(6): 799-813.
[14] BLüMEL C. Was gewinnen wir durch open science und open innovation?[M]. Essen: Edition Stifterverband,2018.
[15] BECK S, BERGENHOLTZ C, BOGERS M, et al.The open innovation in science research field: A collaborative conceptualisation approach[J]. Industry and innovation, 2020: 1-50.
[16] HUIZINGH E K R E. Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives[J]. Technovation, 2011, 31(1): 2-9.
[17] LAURSEN K, SALTER A.Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic management journal, 2006, 27(2): 131-150.
[18] WHITTINGTON R, CAILLUET L, YAKIS﹞DOUGLAS B. Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession[J]. British journal of management, 2011, 22(3): 531-544.
[19] WESTLEY F R.Middle managers and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusion[J]. Strategic management journal, 1990, 11(5): 337-351.
[20] STILGOE J, OWEN R, MACNAGHTEN P.Developing a framework for responsible innovation[M]. The ethics of nanotechnology, geo-engineering and clean energy, 2020: 347-359.
[21] European commission, directorate-general for research and innovation, open innovation, open science, open to the world: A vision for Europe, publications office[EB/OL]. [2022-06-12]. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/552370.
[22] MERTON R K.The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations[M]. University of Chicago press, 1973.
[23] GAESSLER F, HARHOFF D, SORG S.Bargaining failure and freedom to operate: Re-evaluating the effect of patents on cumulative innovation[J]. Max Planck institute for innovation & competition research paper, 2019: 19-11.
[24] EGELIE K J.Management of intellectual property in university-industry collaborations -Public access to and control of knowledge[D]. Trondheim: Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet,2019.
[25] RZHE T A, FOSTER J G, FOSTER I T, et al.Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2015, 112(47): 14569-14574.
[26] OICR T. A Novel open source approach the molecule has been made freely available to the cancer research community to help discover new therapeutic strategies for cancer patients sooner[EB/OL]. (2015-09-03)[2022-02-02]. https://oicr.on.ca/the-ontario-institute-for-cancer-research-and-the-structural-genomics-consortium-develop-and-give-away-new-drug-like-molecule-to-help-crowd-source-cancer-research/.
[27] 张学文, 陈劲. 开放科学的研发模式: 一种独特的创新思想[J]. 清华管理评论, 2017(12): 26-32.
ZHANG X W, CHEN J.Research and development mode of open science: A unique innovative thought[J]. Tsinghua management review, 2017(12): 26-32.
[28] ZIEGLER N, GASSMANN O, FRIESIKE S.Why do firms give away their patents for free?[J]. World patent information, 2014, 37: 19-25.
[29] GASSMANN O, KEUPP M M.The internationalisation of research and development in Swiss and German Born globals: Survey and case study evidence[J]. International journal of entrepreneurship and small business, 2007, 4(3): 214-233.
[30] HECKER, S, HAKLAY, M BOWSE A. Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy[M]. London, UK: UCL press, 2018.
[31] FRANZONI C, POETZ M, SAUERMANN H.Crowds, citizens, and science: A multi-dimensional framework and agenda for future research[J]. Industry and innovation, 2021: 1-34.
[32] OWEN R, MACNAGHTEN P, STILGOE J.Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society[M]. Emerging technologies: Ethics, law and governance, 2020: 117-126.
[33] 梅亮, 吴欣桐, 王伟楠. 科技创新的责任治理: 从开放科学到开放社会[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(12): 1-10.
MEI L, WU X T, WANG W N.Responsible governance of scientific and technological innovation: From open science to open society[J] Scientific Research Management, 2019, 40(12): 1-10.
[1] XIAO Man, WANG Xuan, WANG Fang, HUANG Jinxia. Framework and Development Path of Open Science Capability [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 15-28.
[2] LIU Jingyu, JIA Yujie, HUANG Jinxia, WANG Fang. Ethics Principle Framework of Data Handling for Open Scientific Innovation Ecology [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 29-43.
[3] JIANG Lihui, YI Zhijun, HUANG Jinxia. Implementing UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science: Common and Inclusive Actions [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 44-50.
[4] CHEN Shuxian, LIU Guifeng, LIU Qiong. Research Progress and Implementation of FAIR Principles for Scientific Data Management [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(8): 30-41.
[5] WANG Yihan, CHU Jingli. Quantitative Analysis and Enlightenment on Open Science Policy Texts in Scientific Research Institutions from the Perspective of Policy Tools [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 39-52.
[6] HUANG Jinxia, WANG Xuan, YANG Heng, LIU Jingyu, ZHANG Zhixiong, LIU Xiwen. Summary of the 10th China OA Week: Voices from Some Stakeholders on the Construction of China's Open Scientific Innovation Ecology [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(1): 49-61.
[7] WANG Yihan, YE Yuming. Review on the Research of Open Science at Home and Abroad in Recent Ten Years [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(10): 20-35.
[8] CHEN Xinmei. Conceptual Model and Mechanism of Knowledge Collaboration in Software Enterprises from the Perspective of Open Innovation [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(8): 25-33.
[9] HUANG Jinxia, ZHAO Zhanyi, WANG Fang. Analysis on Open Science Roadmap and Design on Decision-Making Method of Open Science Road [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 5-19.
[10] Peng Yuanyuan, Huang Jinxia, Chen Xuefei, Zhao Zhanyi. Open Access Journals' Development in the Open Science Process: 2017-2020 [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 29-40.
[11] CAO Yuqing, FENG Dongxin, ZHANG Xuefu, SUN Wei, LUO Tingting, XIAN Guojian. Opening up and Sharing Agricultural Scientific and Technological Information Resources: Case Study of the Practice of FAO [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 50-58.
[12] LIU Jingyu, ZHANG Cen, SUN Wenxi, HUANG Jinxia. Analysis of Intellectual Property Problems in Open Science [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 59-69.
[13] LIU Zhihui, WEI Juanxia. Research on SMEs' Competitive Technology Intelligence Methodology System Oriented Open Innovation [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(6): 12-20.
[14] WANG Zhenyu. Research on the Knowledge Service Model of New Think-tank in Open Innovation Environment [J]. , 2018, 30(10): 139-142.
[15] ZHAI Xin. The Role of Japan’s University Libraries in Open Access and Open Science Advocating [J]. , 2017, 29(8): 84-87.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!