开放科学视域下多类型科研成果学术贡献归因研究

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.24-0416

Abstract

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] In the open science environment, the mode of collaborative knowledge production is widely used, and the types of scientific outputs are becoming increasingly diverse. Therefore, effective identification and recognition of various contribution contents made by different contributors in open research is crucial to improve transparent disclosure and effective use of research output's contribution data. [Method/Process] Based on the systematic study of domestic and foreign scholarly contribution theories and practices, this study proposes a scholarly contribution analysis system for open science. From the perspective of the creation process of scientific research outputs, research on the attribution of scientific contributions is carried out, focusing on three aspects: the identification of contributors and contribution elements, the calculation of the degree of contribution, and the representation of contribution data. In addition, a paper from the open access platform PLoS One is selected as an empirical case to demonstrate the validity of the process and method of attributing scholarly contributions. It was found that the contribution score is inversely proportional to the number of contributors, i.e., the more the number of contributors, the less likely it is to have a high contribution score. The more contribution elements contributors participate in, the higher the contribution score they receive. If contributors participate in the same contribution elements, and their contribution scores may also be the same. For the same contribution factor, the higher the number of contributors, the lower the contribution degree of each contributor. This paper summarizes the application scenarios of academic contributions from three aspects: clearly distinguishing author and non-author contributors, establishing correlation between contribution data and other LOD ontologies, establishing attribution and responsibility mechanism for academic contributions, and improving the index system of scientific research evaluation. [Results/Conclusions] Academic contribution is an important part of the open science system. It is an inevitable trend to improve the openness and transparency of academic contributions to various scientific research results. However, existing methods for attributing contributions are scattered, lack systematicity, and mainly apply to a certain type of achievement, which has certain limitations in terms of disciplines and achievements. In the future, the applicability of the contribution attribution method can be improved by expanding the application objects of contributions to include research papers, scientific data, scientific software, preprints, scientific notes, and more, establishing a common contribution element system for all types of research outputs, and optimizing the method of calculating the contribution rate. Finally, it is necessary to continuously enrich and expand the application scope and application scenarios of scientific research output's contribution data.

Key words: open science, scientific research outputs, contribution data, contribution identification, contribution attribution

CLC Number:

G252.6

Leilei KOU. Attribution of Academic Contributions to Multiple Scientific Outputs from an Open Science Perspective[J].Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2024, (): 1-12.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.2

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

References 40

1	周春雷, 王岩. 中文图情期刊论文作者贡献声明标注分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2023, 34(10): 1321-1327.
	ZHOU C L, WANG Y. Labeling analysis of author contribution statement in Chinese library and information science journal papers[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2023, 34(10): 1321-1327.
2	孔晔晗, 刘茜, 都平平, 等. 社科领域期刊作者贡献声明政策的调研与建议[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2021, 32(3): 344-352.
	KONG Y H, LIU Q, DU P P, et al. A survey of author contribution statement policy in social science journals and strategies[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2021, 32(3): 344-352.
3	唐晓波, 向莉丽, 牟昊. 基于研究问题与研究方法贡献的论文学术价值早期识别方法[J]. 情报科学, 2022, 40(9): 3-11, 19.
	TANG X B, XIANG L L, MOU H. Early identification method of academic value of papers based on research question and research method contribution[J]. Information science, 2022, 40(9): 3-11, 19.
4	Foster. Open science[EB/OL]. [2023-03-01].
5	AUSTIN, CLAIRE C. The open science ecosystem: A systematic framework anchored in values, ethics, and FAIRER data[EB/OL]. [2020-07-17].
6	UNESCO. Understanding open science[EB/OL]. [2024-02-07].
7	COS. Open science[EB/OL]. [2023-03-01].
8	Global aliance for genomics & health. GA4GH builds the foundation for broad and responsible use of genomic data[EB/OL]. [2024-03-03].
9	NISO. Author rights[EB/OL]. [2024-03-07].
10	VIVO.What is VIVO?[EB/OL]. [2024-03-10].
11	Github. Open research information framework[EB/OL]. [2024-03-10].
12	W 3C. PROV-overview[EB/OL]. [2024-03-10].
13	ACUMEN. Career management skills[EB/OL]. [2024-03-12].
14	刘昊. 学术社交网络用户知识贡献行为影响因素研究[D]. 大连: 辽宁师范大学, 2022.
	LIU H. Research on influencing factors of knowledge contribution behavior of academic social network users[D]. Dalian: Liaoning Normal University, 2022.
15	刘苡声. 虚拟学术社区用户持续知识贡献行为及激励策略研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2021.
	LIU Y S. Research on the continuous knowledge contribution behavior and incentive strategy of virtual academic community users[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2021.
16	谭旸, 秦渴, 袁勤俭. 激励机制对学术虚拟社区知识贡献效果的影响研究[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(9): 106-116.
	TAN Y, QIN K, YUAN Q J. Research on the influence of incentive mechanism on the knowledge contribution effect of virtual academic community[J]. Journal of modern information, 2020, 40(9): 106-116.
17	CASRAI. CRediT[EB/OL]. [2023-11-14].
18	SCoRO, the scholarly contributions and roles ontology[EB/OL]. [2023-11-15].
19	OLS. Contributor role ontology[EB/OL]. [2024-01-14].
20	Protfolio Nature. Authorship[EB/OL]. [2024-01-11].
21	郝惠子. 基于作者贡献声明的生物学领域支持型作者识别研究[D]. 太原: 山西财经大学, 2023.
	HAO H Z. Research on supporting authors identification in biology based on author contribution statement[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi University of Finance & Economics, 2023.
22	罗卓然, 蔡乐, 钱佳佳, 等. 学术论文创新贡献句识别研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(12): 93-100.
	LUO Z R, CAI L, QIAN J J, et al. Research on the recognition of innovative contribution sentences of academic papers[J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(12): 93-100.
23	黄晨, 赵星, 卞杨奕, 等. 测量学术贡献的关键词分析法探析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(6): 84-99.
	HUANG C, ZHAO X, BIAN Y Y, et al. Measuring academic contributions via keyword analytics[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2019, 45(6): 84-99.
24	李佳培, 安海岗, 冯鑫. Altmetrics学术影响力传播贡献度实证研究[J]. 情报探索, 2021(3): 26-32.
	LI J P, AN H G, FENG X. Empirical research on diffusion contribution of altmetrics academic influence[J]. Information research, 2021(3): 26-32.
25	王申罡, 秦顺, 郭鑫, 等. 国际图书情报学期刊发文的学术实体贡献测度研究[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(6): 64-76.
	WANG S G, QIN S, GUO X, et al. Measuring contributions of academic entities to five top-tier library and information science(LIS)journals[J]. Library tribune, 2022, 42(6): 64-76.
26	张闪闪. 作者贡献权重算法优化研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2016.
	ZHANG S S. Research on optimization of author's contribution weight algorithm[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016.
27	tracker Animal. Description of the project[EB/OL]. [2024-02-16].
28	STEM Learning. Evolution megaLab[EB/OL]. [2024-03-03].
29	Galaxy zoo[EB/OL]. [2024-01-25].
30	Flodit[EB/OL]. [2024-01-26].
31	Crowd research: Open and scalable university laboratories[EB/OL]. [2024-03-07].
32	全球变化科学研究数据出版系统[EB/OL]. [2024-02-16].
	Global change research data publishing & repository[EB/OL]. [2024-02-16].
33	国家地球科学数据出版系统[EB/OL]. [2024-02-18].
	National earth system science data center[EB/OL]. [2024-02-18].
34	OSF. Discover public research[EB/OL]. [2024-03-06].
35	Github[EB/OL]. [2024-03-09].
36	CSDN[EB/OL]. [2024-03-09].
37	SAUERMANN H, HAEUSSLER C. Authorship and contribution disclosures[J]. Science advances, 2017, 3(11): e1700404.
38	Nick Steinmetz[EB/OL]. [2024-03-12].
39	PROKOP-DORNER A, PIŁAT-KOBLA A, ŚLUSARCZYK M, et al. Teaching methods for critical thinking in health education of children up to high school: A scoping review[J]. PLoS One, 2024, 19(7): e0307094.
40	寇蕾蕾. 开放科学环境下学术贡献识别及计算方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2020.
	KOU L L. Research on identification and calculation method of academic contribution in open science environment[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020.

Related Articles 13

[1]	JIANG Lihui, YI Zhijun, HUANG Jinxia. Implementing UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science: Common and Inclusive Actions [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 44-50.
[2]	LIU Jingyu, JIA Yujie, HUANG Jinxia, WANG Fang. Ethics Principle Framework of Data Handling for Open Scientific Innovation Ecology [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 29-43.
[3]	XIAO Man, WANG Xuan, WANG Fang, HUANG Jinxia. Framework and Development Path of Open Science Capability [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 15-28.
[4]	CHEN Xuefei, HUANG Jinxia, WANG Fang. Open Science: Connotation of Open Innovation and Its Mechanism for Innovation Ecology [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 5-14.
[5]	CHEN Shuxian, LIU Guifeng, LIU Qiong. Research Progress and Implementation of FAIR Principles for Scientific Data Management [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(8): 30-41.
[6]	WANG Yihan, CHU Jingli. Quantitative Analysis and Enlightenment on Open Science Policy Texts in Scientific Research Institutions from the Perspective of Policy Tools [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 39-52.
[7]	HUANG Jinxia, WANG Xuan, YANG Heng, LIU Jingyu, ZHANG Zhixiong, LIU Xiwen. Summary of the 10th China OA Week: Voices from Some Stakeholders on the Construction of China's Open Scientific Innovation Ecology [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(1): 49-61.
[8]	WANG Yihan, YE Yuming. Review on the Research of Open Science at Home and Abroad in Recent Ten Years [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(10): 20-35.
[9]	LIU Jingyu, ZHANG Cen, SUN Wenxi, HUANG Jinxia. Analysis of Intellectual Property Problems in Open Science [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 59-69.
[10]	CAO Yuqing, FENG Dongxin, ZHANG Xuefu, SUN Wei, LUO Tingting, XIAN Guojian. Opening up and Sharing Agricultural Scientific and Technological Information Resources: Case Study of the Practice of FAO [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 50-58.
[11]	Peng Yuanyuan, Huang Jinxia, Chen Xuefei, Zhao Zhanyi. Open Access Journals' Development in the Open Science Process: 2017-2020 [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 29-40.
[12]	HUANG Jinxia, ZHAO Zhanyi, WANG Fang. Analysis on Open Science Roadmap and Design on Decision-Making Method of Open Science Road [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 5-19.
[13]	ZHAI Xin. The Role of Japan’s University Libraries in Open Access and Open Science Advocating [J]. , 2017, 29(8): 84-87.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

研究阶段	成果产出	获取平台
规划准备	研究报告：包括研究构思和、项目规划设计等研究协议：开展项目协作的研究协议	Trello、protocols.io
研究实施	数据集：数据收集、数据处理和数据保存等各阶段的原始数据集和其他数据集	Zenodo
研究实施	软件：在所有研究阶段创建和使用的各类软件	Github、GitLab、BitBucket、SourceForge
研究交流	研究组内部交流或与外部交流相关的所有成果，包括交流报告、出版物、会议演示文稿、工作流程、海报、预印本及其他出版物	学术会议、DOAJ

贡献本体	贡献者角色	编码格式
CRediT	概念化、数据管理、形式分析、资助获取、调查、方法、项目管理、资源、软件、监督、验证、可视化、撰写初稿、审阅及修订	JATS xml v1.2
SCoRO	调查角色、项目角色、数据角色、写作角色、组织角色	支持RDF/XML、Turtle、N-triple、JSON-LD
CRO	接收角色、咨询角色、作者角色、收集角色、概念化角色、数据角色、发现角色、教育和培训角色、形式分析角色、获取资助角色、资助来源角色、硬件角色、基础设施角色、仪器角色、调查角色、图书馆员角色、营销和沟通角色、方法论角色、修饰角色、患者招募角色、同行评审角色、政策制定角色、主持人角色、保存角色、项目管理角色、资源角色、软件角色、标准开发角色、提交者角色、监督角色、验证角色、可视化角色	RDF

贡献者角色	贡献要素
写作角色	提出研究问题；研究概念设计；文献检索及文献综述；图、表设计制作；研究结果集成；撰写稿件；审核修订稿件；稿件质量保证
数据角色	数据方案设计；数据收集；数据处理；数据建模；数据质量检查；数据标准开发；数据转化；数据验证；形式分析；数据发布；存储管理
实验角色	实验设计；实验调查；实验分析；技术支持
软件角色	需求分析；编写代码；软件架构设计；软件开发；软件项目管理；软件工程；软件测试；撰写技术文档
方法论角色	制定研究指南；创建协议；开发标准化操作程序；设计研究方法
研究管理角色	项目管理；研究协调；研究监督；团队管理；法律法规遵循审查
资源存档角色	纸质资料保存管理；数字化资源保存管理
资助角色	获取资助；资助使用过程管理
资源角色	提供各类资源

贡献要素贡献者	CS	MP	NAS	CBR	MC	KDH
研究概念设计	☆	☆	☆		☆	☆
获取资助					△	◇
实验设计	◇	◇	◇	◇
研究方法设计	△	◇
提供资源					△	◇
编写代码	△	◇
撰写稿件	□	◇			◇
贡献分值	38%	23%	5%	2%	20%	12%

贡献者	贡献要素（依据CEediT贡献角色定义）
Anna Prokop-Dorner	概念化，数据管理，形式分析，资助获取，调查，方法，软件，可视化，撰写初稿，稿件审阅及修订
Aleksandra Piłat-Kobla	概念化，数据管理，形式分析，资助获取，调查，方法，软件，可视化，撰写初稿，稿件审阅及修订
Magdalena Ślusarczyk	概念化，数据管理，资助获取，稿件审阅及修订
Maria Świątkiewicz-Mośny	概念化，数据管理，资助获取，项目管理，资源，稿件审阅及修订
Natalia Ożegalska-Łukasik	概念化，数据管理，资助获取，稿件审阅及修订
Aleksandra Potysz-Rzyman	数据管理，稿件审阅及修订
Marianna Zarychta	数据管理，稿件审阅及修订
Albert Juszczyk	数据管理，稿件审阅及修订
Dominika Kondyjowska	数据管理，稿件审阅及修订
Agnieszka Magiera	数据管理，稿件审阅及修订
Małgorzata Maraj	数据管理，稿件审阅及修订
Dawid Storman	数据管理，稿件审阅及修订
Sylwia Warzecha	数据管理，稿件审阅及修订
Paulina Węglarz	数据管理，稿件审阅及修订
Magdalena Wojtaszek-Główka	数据管理，稿件审阅及修订
Wioletta Żabicka	数据管理，稿件审阅及修订
Małgorzata M Bała	概念化，数据管理，形式分析，资助获取，调查，方法，项目管理，资源，软件，监督，稿件审阅及修订

Attribution of Academic Contributions to Multiple Scientific Outputs from an Open Science Perspective

RichHTML

PDF (PC)