中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 4-12.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.23-0849

    Next Articles

The Challenge of Artificial Intelligence Scientists to the Epistemology of Science

DUAN Weiwen1,2,3   

  1. 1. School of Philosophy, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102445;
    2. Institute of Philosophy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732;
    3. Shanghai Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence, Shanghai 200232
  • Received:2023-10-17 Online:2023-11-05 Published:2024-02-28

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This study aims to explore the challenges that artificially intelligent (AI) scientists may bring to scientific epistemology. [Method/Process] Scientific discovery has long been of interest to AI researchers. The next big step in AI is the development of AI scientists. AI scientists should be able to independently motivate, make, understand, and communicate discoveries. Although the current robot scientists are still just a form of AI-driven automated experimental apparatus, and the best AI systems today cannot define their own hypothesis space and experimental design. At best, they can be considered to be a primitive form of AI scientists. Clearly, the specific path of AI-driven scientific research or the transition to AI scientists will inevitably be influenced by the frontier development of AI. Current AI systems must overcome the following major technical challenges: 1) making strategic choices in their research goals; 2) developing the ability to generate exciting and novel hypotheses in areas that push boundaries; 3) designing innovative approaches and experiments to test hypotheses that go beyond the use of prototype experiments; 4) focusing on and describing important discoveries in a way that can be understood by human scientists. The highly autonomous AI scientists can either make discoveries on their own or collaborate with other human and machine scientists to make Nobel-level discoveries. After reviewing the relevant AI applications in scientific research, this study illustrates the main characteristics of AI scientists and the two disruptive changes they bring about at the epistemological level: a leap in AI capabilities and AI for Science as the 5th paradigm of scientific research. [Results/Conclusions] The implications of AI for Science are revolutionary, but recent AI-driven explorations in scientific research increasingly support the possibility of its realization. In this situation, discussions on the epistemological issues of relevant sciences need to go beyond general philosophical debates and instead explore epistemological strategies for the coming scientific revolution in AI. In view of the coming scientific revolution in AI, this study proposes four strategies. First, we should pay more attention to the problems and solutions in the process of developing AI scientists. Second, the key to advancing the scientific revolution in AI is to find ways to eliminate factors that may lead to failure. Then, we use different strategies to achieve the scientific revolution of AI. Finally, we take advantage of metaphorical methods to help us develop AI scientists.

Key words: AI for Science, AI scientists, scientific epistemology, automated science

CLC Number: 

  • TP18
[1] KITANO H.Artificial intelligence to win the Nobel prize and beyond: Creating the engine for scientific discovery[J]. AI magazine, 2016, 37(1): 39-49.
[2] GIL Y.Thoughtful artificial intelligence: Forginganewpartnershipfordata science and scientific discovery[J]. Data science, 2017, 1(1/2): 119-129.
[3] KING R D, ROWLAND J, OLIVER S G, et al.The automation of science[J]. Science, 2009, 324(5923): 85-89.
[4] KITANO H.Nobel Turing Challenge: Creating the engine for scientific discovery[J]. NPJ systems biology and applications, 2021, 7: 29.
[5] SCHMIDT M, LIPSON H.Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data[J]. Science, 2009, 324(5923): 81-85.
[6] CHO A.AI in Action: AI's early proving ground: The hunt for new particles[J]. Science, 2017, 357(6346): 20.
[7] COLEY C W, EYKE N S, JENSEN K F.Autonomous discovery in the chemical sciences part I: Progress[J]. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59: 22858-2893.
[8] COLEY C W, EYKE N S, JENSEN K F.Autonomous discovery in the chemical sciences part II: Outlook[J]. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59: 23414-23436.
[9] AI scientist grand challenge: Summary of discussion during work-shop held in February2020[EB/OL].[2023-08-05]. https://www.turing.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-02/summary_of_discussion_workshop_2020_ai_scientist_grand_challenge_clean.pdf.
[10] SOLDATOVA L N, CLARE A, SPARKES A, et al.An ontology for a robot scientist[J]. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2006, 22(14): e464-e471.
[11] FEIGENBAUM E A.Some challenges and grand challenges for computational intelligence[J]. Journal of the ACM, 2003, 50(1): 32-40.
[12] GRAY J.What next? A dozen information-technology research goals[J]. Journal of the ACM, 50(1): 41-57.
[13] OECD. Artificial intelligence in science: Challenges, opportunities and the future of research[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023.
[14] KING R, ZENIL H.A framework for evaluating the AI-driven au-tomation of science, in Artificial intelligence in science: Challenges, opportunities and the future of research[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023.
[15] KING R D, SCHULER COSTA V, MELLINGWOOD C, et al.Automating sciences: Philosophical and social dimensions[J]. IEEE technology and society magazine, 2018, 37(1): 40-46.
[16] BOIKO D A, MACKNIGHT R, KLINE B, et al.Autonomous chemical research with large language models[J]. Nature, 2023, 624(7992): 570-578.
[17] (美)保罗·汉弗莱斯. 苏湛, 董春雨, 孙卫民, 校译. 延长的万物之尺: 计算科学、经验主义与科学方法[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2017.
HUMPHREYS P W.Extending ourselves: Computational science, empiricism, and scientific method[M]. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 2017.
[18] MATTHEW H.Hypotheses devised by AI could find "blind spots" in research[EB/OL].[2023-11-17].https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03596-0.
[1] SUN Tan, ZHANG Zhixiong, ZHOU Lihong, WANG Dongbo, ZHANG Hai, LI Baiyang, YONG Suhua, ZUO Wangmeng, YANG Guanglei.

The Transformation and Observations of AI for Science (AI4S) Driven by Artificial Intelligence [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 0, (): 4-32.

[2] SUN Tan, ZHANG Zhixiong, ZHOU Lihong, WANG Dongbo, ZHANG Hai, LI Baiyang, YONG Suhua, ZUO Wangmeng, YANG Guanglei. The Transformation and Observations of AI for Science (AI4S) Driven by Artificial Intelligence [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(10): 4-29.
[3] CHEN Yuanyuan, WANG Lei. Think-Tank's Text Summarization Based on Combined Keywords and Contrastive Learning Training [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(6): 72-82.
[4] SHOU Jianqi. Towards Known Unknowns: GPT Large Language Models Empower Human-Centered Information Retrieval [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(5): 16-26.
[5] ZHAO Ruixue, HUANG Yongwen, MA Weilu, DONG Wenjia, XIAN Guojian, SUN Tan. Insights and Reflections of the Impact of ChatGPT on Intelligent Knowledge Services in Libraries [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(1): 29-38.
[6] YI Hong. Design and Implementation on the Library IR of University for Nationalities Based on Dspace [J]. , 2015, 27(10): 33-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!