中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 59-69.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.23-0121

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison and Analysis of Library's Participation in Scientific Culture Construction

ZHENG Jing   

  1. The Science and Technology Library of GuangdongInstitute of lnformation,Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Giuangzhou 510075
  • Received:2023-03-03 Online:2023-04-05 Published:2023-07-12

Abstract: [Pupose/Significance] The library community can contribute greatly to scientific culture construction. This paper aims tosystematically analyze the connotation of scientific culture construction and explore the potential space where libraries can participate inscientific culture construction. give some enlightenment to libraries in our country.[MethodProcess] This research adopts the methodsof literature research, network research and systematic literature review.First,this study extracts Chinese keywords based on the Chineseliterature about "scientific culture" and analyzes its connotations. Ssecond it builds a list of English and Chinese keywords containing thesub concepts of "scientific culture". After retrieving, classifying and reading the literature about practice of libraries' participation inscientific culture construction carefully,this study compares the practice of Euro-American libraries and Chinese libraries, and putsforward countermeasures and suggestions for Chinese libraries to bridge the gap.[ResultsiConclusions] Scientific culture includes threelayers: scientific culture as basic literacy, scientific culture as research ethics and scientific culture as workplace culture of researchers.Libraries can play an important role to support all of them.However, considering the present situation,Chinese public libraries aresignificantly insufficient in participating in the constructing of scientific culture as basic literacy.University libraries are the main actorsin constucting scientific culture as research ethics and scientific culture as workplace culture of researchers, but the practical results didnot meet expectations. The important problems include few researchers embrace data management and planning, few researchers payattntion to the reproducibility crisis, research integrity education is not enough, and research evaluation services is a lack of standards. Leaming from the experience of other foreign libraries and combining the situation of Chinese libraries, this study proposes that Chinesepublic libraries can increase their participation in scientific culture construction through promoting ideology, strengthening links with thescientific community, increasing the proportion of STEM activities, absorbing ethics related courses, and carrying out citizen science andother comprehensive science popularization activities. Chinese academic libraries can provide the acadenmic integrity support service of"trinity of facilities, resources and services". Besides that, the construction of the academic evaluation service standard of academiclibraries and practicing responsible scientific measurement can maintain the faimess of the academic workplace so as to promote thescientific culture as research ethics and scientific culture as workplace culture of researchers. Our future work will conduct thematicresearch around the medium and micro levels of scientific culture. The preliminary direction is the standard of responsible scientificmeasurement.

Key words: scientific culture, 1ibrary, scientific spirit, science education, academic integrity

CLC Number: 

  • G250
[1] The nuffield council on bioethics. The culture of scientific research in the UK[EB/OL]. [2023-02-12]. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Nuffield_research_culture_full_report_web.pdf.
[2] 眭平. 企业科技研发机构的创新灵魂: 科学文化环境——从贝尔实验室的科学文化环境谈起[J]. 科技管理研究, 2009, 29(2): 279-281.
SUI P.The innovative soul of enterprise's R&D institution: Scientific and cultural environment - Talking from the scientific and cultural environment of bell laboratories[J]. Science and technology management research, 2009, 29(2): 279-281.
[3] 高洁. 科学文化的历史溯源及其当代境遇[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2019, 41(12): 103-108.
GAO J.Historical origin of scientific culture and its contemporary situations[J]. Journal of dialectics of nature, 2019, 41(12): 103-108.
[4] 周忠和. 科学文化建设需要重视科学普及和科学教育[J]. 科技导报, 2019, 37(9): ID 1.
ZHOU Z H.Scientific and cultural construction needs to pay attention to scientific popularization and scientific education[J]. Science & technology review, 2019, 37(9): 1.
[5] GODIN B, GINGRAS Y.What is scientific and technological culture and how is it measured? A multidimensional model[J]. Public understanding of science, 2000, 9(1): 43-58.
[6] 王文敬, 洪晓楠. 习近平关于科学文化与创新人才的重要论述研究[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 2022, 39(3): 110-116.
WANG W J, HONG X N.Xi jinping's important expositions on the relationships between scientific culture and innovation professionals[J]. Studies in philosophy of science and technology, 2022, 39(3): 110-116.
[7] The royal society. Research culture embedding inclusive excellence[EB/OL].[2023-02-14]. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/Publications/2018/research-culture-workshop-report.pdf.
[8] 于博雅, 郑康妮, 陈朝晖. 图书馆借助新媒体传播科学文化的实践研究——以中国科学院文献情报中心“科学人讲坛”为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(24): 48-56.
YU B Y, ZHENG K N, CHEN Z H.A research of the practice which library transmit science culture by using new media way: A case of science fellow forum in national science library, CAS[J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(24): 48-56.
[9] 曾敬. 美国高校及中小学图书馆的公民科研支持服务[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2016, 36(11): 108-113.
ZENG J.The study on citizen science assistant services of American academic libraries and school libraries[J]. Library tribune, 2016, 36(11): 108-113.
[10] UCL. Libraries leading AI and digital citizenship[EB/OL].[2023-02-15].https://www.urbanlibraries.org/files/AI_Leadership-Brief.pdf.
[11] IFLA. IFLA Statement on libraries and artificial intelligence[EB/OL].[2023-02-16]. https://repository.ifla.org/bitstream/123456789/1646/1/ifla_statement_on_libraries_and_artificial_intelligence-full-text.pdf.
[12] 肖鹏, 赵庆香. 通往数字人才强国之路:《提升全民数字素养与技能行动纲要》与大学生数字素养教育战略[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(12): 6-15.
XIAO P, ZHAO Q X.The road to digital talent power: Action plan for enhancing digital literacy and skills of the people and college students' digital literacy education strategy[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2021, 33(12): 6-15.
[13] N.Y.C.M.s.O.o.t.C.T. The New York City artificial intelligence strategy2021[EB/OL]. [2023-02-17]. https://a860-gpp.nyc.gov/downloads/x059c967t?locale=en.
[14] IMLS. AI & Co-design in public libraries: Empowering underserved youth to cultivate symbiotic relationships between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and their communities[EB/OL].[2023-02-17]. https://www.imls.gov/sites/default/files/project-proposals/lg-250059-ols-21-full-proposal.pdf.
[15] GRANT S, BOUSKILL K E.Why institutional review boards should have a role in the open science movement[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 2019, 116(43): 21336-21338.
[16] BEREZA E.The use of clinical databases in disease outcomes research: Is the ethics of IRB review keeping up?[J]. Multiple sclerosis journal, 2017, 23(10): 1325-1327.
[17] SCHOPFEL J, AZEROUAL O, JUNGBAUER-GANS M.Research ethics, open science and CRIS[J]. Publications, 2020, 8(4): 51.
[18] VITALE C R H. Is research reproducibility the new data management for libraries?[J]. Bulletin of the american society for information science and technology (online), 2016. 42(3):38-41.
[19] 孔祥辉. 研究型图书馆面向再现性危机的服务框架[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(3): 87-97.
KONG X H.Research on research libraries' service framework towards the reproducibility crisis[J]. Library tribune, 2022, 42(3): 87-97.
[20] 冯菲, 袁子晗. 世界一流大学图书馆科研诚信教育的实践与启示[J/OL]. 图书馆建设: 1-17[2023-05-18]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1331.G2.20220216.1248.006.html.
FENG F, YUAN Z H. Eaasy on the practice of research integrity education in world-class university libraries and its implications[J/OL]. Library Development:1-17[2023-05-18]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1331.G2.20220216.1248.006.html.
[21] 武学超. 模式3知识生产的理论阐释——内涵、情境、特质与大学向度[J]. 科学学研究, 2014, 32(9): 1297-1305.
WU X C.Theoretical interpretation of mode 3 knowledge production: Connotation, adaptive context, attributes and university dimension[J]. Studies in science of science, 2014, 32(9): 1297-1305.
[22] British academy. Crossing paths: Interdisciplinary institutions, careers, education and applications[EB/OL].[2023-02-17] https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/213/crossing-paths.pdf.
[23] DORA. Roles and actions for libraries to advance research assessment reform[EB/OL].[2023-02-17]. https://sfdora.org/2020/04/23/roles-and-actions-for-libraries-to-advance-research-assessment-reform/.
[24] University of Nottingham UK. Responsible use of research metrics at Nottingham[EB/OL].[2023-02-17]. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/library/research/publication/responsible-indicators.aspx.
[25] 徐基田. 图书馆科普教育现状与发展路径探究——基于25个省市88家科普教育基地调查[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(9): 35-45.
XU J T.Research on the current situation and development path of popular science education in libraries - A survey of 88 popular science education bases in 25 provinces and municipalities in China[J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(9): 35-45.
[26] 石剑兰, 高波. 我国公共图书馆少年儿童创客空间服务研究[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2022(5): 112-121.
SHI J L, GAO B.Research on children's maker space service in Chinese public libraries[J]. Library work and study, 2022(5): 112-121.
[27] 晋熠. 公共图书馆创客空间运营管理的思考[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2018(11): 47-51.
JIN Y.Analysis on operational management of public library makerspaces[J]. Digital library forum, 2018(11): 47-51.
[28] 刘容超. 数字素养时代的国际合作:媒介与信息素养联盟(MIL Alliance)的起源、使命与行动[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(12): 37-47.
LIU R C.International cooperation in digital world: Origin, goals and actions of the UNESCO media and information literacy alliance (MIL Alliance)[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2021, 33(12): 37-47.
[29] 郭紫瑜. 公共图书馆公众信息素养教育实践分析与策略研究[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2023(1): 107-113.
GUO Z Y.Practice analysis and strategy research on public information literacy education in public library[J]. Library theory and practice, 2023(1): 107-113.
[30] 徐彤阳, 任浩然. 数字图书馆视域下学术论文图像篡改造假检测研究[J]. 现代情报, 2018, 38(7): 81-87.
XU T Y, REN H R.Research on image tampering and fraud detection of academic papers in digital library[J]. Journal of modern information, 2018, 38(7): 81-87.
[31] 孔晔晗, 彭琳, 袁军鹏,等. 科技期刊预警监测系统构建[J]. 编辑学报, 2022, 34(4):369-377.
KONG Y H, PENG L, YUAN J P, et al.Construction of an early warning system for sci-tech journals[J]. Acta editologica, 2022, 34
32 (4): 369-377.
[32] 张丽华, 张康宁, 赵迎光, 等. 科研人员职业生涯学术论文相似度及其对被引频次的影响分析[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(8): 822-831.
ZHANG L H, ZHANG K N, ZHAO Y G, et al.Impact of article similarity on citation counts during researchers' career development[J]. Journal of the China society for scientific and technical information, 2022, 41(8): 822-831.
[33] 顾立平, 张潇月. 开放科学环境下数据馆员的实践探析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2020(2): 60-74, 112.
GU L P, ZHANG X Y.Exploration of data librarian practice in open science[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2020(2): 60-74, 112.
[34] 温芳芳, 刘圆. 对我国高校图书馆信息素养通识教育的思考——基于10所中外高校图书馆的比较研究[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2023(1): 114-122.
WEN F F, LIU Y.Reflections on the general education of information literacy in Chinese university libraries: Based on a comparative study of 10 Chinese and foreign university libraries[J]. Library theory and practice, 2023(1): 114-122.
[35] 袁子晗, 靳彤, 张红伟, 等. 我国42所大学科研诚信教育状况实证分析[J]. 科学与社会, 2019, 9(1): 50-62.
YUAN Z H, JIN T, ZHANG H W, et al.Empirical analysis on academic integrity education of 42 Chinese universities[J]. Science and society, 2019, 9(1): 50-62.
[36] 陈幼华, 吴仕明. LAM视域下的高校科学家图书馆功能体系建构[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(5): 52-59.
CHEN Y H, WU S M.Research on the functional system of university scientist memorial libraries from the LAM perspective[J]. Library tribune, 2022, 42(5): 52-59.
[37] 张永娟, 张丽雯, 阮梅花, 等. 生命科学与基础医学全球科研机构产出评价π指数分析报告[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2019, 4(1): 86-96.
ZHANG Y J, ZHANG L W, RUAN M H, et al.Reports of π index: Metrics of research productivity in life and basic medical sciences[J]. Think tank: Theory & practice, 2019, 4(1): 86-96.
[38] 何晓庆. 基于合著作者贡献分配权值算法的学者评价改进z指数研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2023, 42(3): 35-43.
HE X Q.Research on improved z-indexes based on the co-author contribution division value[J]. Library journal, 2023, 42(3): 35-43.
[39] 庞弘燊, 王超, 胡正银. “双一流”大学建设中人才引进评价指标库及指标体系构建[J]. 情报杂志, 2019, 38(3): 67-74.
PANG H S, WANG C, HU Z Y.A theoretical study on the index pool and indicator system for the evaluation of talent introduction in the construction of “world-class” universities[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2019, 38(3): 67-74.
[40] 杨岳, 王贤文. Altmetrics十年发展综述[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(11): 136-146.
YANG Y, WANG X W.Altmetrics review over 2010-2020[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2021, 40(11): 136-146.
[41] 许天才, 冯婷婷, 潘雨亭, 等. 高校图书馆辅助论文代表作复合式评价的调研与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(14): 49-57.
XU T C, FENG T T, PAN Y T, et al.Investigation and analysis of compound evaluation of representative papers assisted by university libraries[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(14): 49-57.
[42] 刘霞, 马浩琴, 何汶, 等. 学术评价改革背景下高校图书馆学科分析服务的转型探索——以武汉大学图书馆为例[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2023, 42(3): 44-51.
LIU X, MA H Q, HE W, et al.Exploration on the transformation of subject analysis service in university library under the background of academic evaluation reform: Taking Wuhan university library as an example[J]. Library journal, 2023, 42(3): 44-51.
[43] 李兰芳, 陈云伟, 张雪, 等. 论空间科学计量学的研究与应用[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(7): 27-38.
LI L F, CHEN Y W, ZHANG X, et al.Research and application of spatial scientometrics[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 27-38.
[44] 曾建勋. 图书馆应开创学术规范服务[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2019(8): 1.
ZENG J X.Library should create academic norms service[J]. Digital library forum, 2019(8): 1.
[45] 吴汉华, 王波. 2020年中国高校图书馆基本统计数据报告[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2021, 39(4): 5-11.
WU H H, WANG B.A report on the statistical data of Chinese academic libraries in 2020[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2021, 39
46 (4): 5-11.
[46] 邱均平, 李小涛. 高校图书馆标准化研究的回顾与展望[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(2): 131-135, 74.
QIU J P, LI X T.Retrospect and prospect of study on university libraries standardization[J]. Library and information service, 2015, 59(2): 131-135, 74.
[47] 李健. 高校图书馆服务标准体系研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.
LI J.Research on service standard system of university library[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017.
[1] YANG Xinmei, WANG Zheng, LI Shanshan. Activity-based Innovation and Operation Practice of Popular Science Education in Libraries: A Case Study of Summer Science Project in Overseas Libraries [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(3): 81-91.
[2] ZHOU Jie, LIU Haitao. Application of Blockchain Technology in the Construction of Scientific Research Integrity in Universities [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(8): 34-39.
[3] QIN Feifei, CAO Tao, QIAN Zhiyong. Academic Integrity Knowledge Organization Integrated with Online Teaching of Information Literacy [J]. , 2017, 29(12): 120-126.
[4] LU Hong-zhou. Study on Academic Integrity Guarantee Mechanism and Development of Periodicalls [J]. , 2014, 26(7): 133-136.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!