中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 81-93.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0402

;

• Bibliometrics • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Measurement of Talent Team Structure Characteristics and Its Correlation with Discipline Development in Universities

ZHANG Faliang, LIN Yuepei, DONG Wenping, ZHAI Wei   

  1. School of Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031
  • Received:2021-04-13 Online:2021-06-05 Published:2021-06-15

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Researchers are the main force of discipline construction in universities. Analyzing and measuring the characteristics of talent team structure and their development is conducive to summarizing the laws of discipline talent team in world-class universities, and analyzing its influence on the long-term development of disciplines, which can provide guidance for universities' discipline construction in China. [Method/Process] A structural characteristics analysis and measurement system of talent team was constructed based on papers published in different fields of research, and by using the methods of scientometrics, and social network analysis. There are 12 indicators in total, which include 4 aspects: internal structure, stability, correlation of research content and internal cooperation of talent team. Then, the correlation models between the characteristics of talent team structure and the productivity, influence of disciplines are constructed to analyze the influences of talent team structures on the development of disciplines in universities. The data of 10 world-class universities in computer science from 2001 to 2020 are used for empirical analysis. [Results/conclusions] The study shows that the correlation between the different characteristics of talent team structure and discipline productivity is not significant, but it has different influences on the overall influence of disciplines. Among them, the relevance of research content and the close degree of cooperation among the main members have obvious promotion effect on discipline influence. The stability of the main team members also has a certain degree of influence on the discipline performance. However, the internal structure and other characteristics, such as the proportion of top talent, are relatively weak in relation to discipline influence. Based on this, it is proposed that in the process of discipline development, universities should strengthen the stability of the main team members, the relevance of research contents and the closeness of cooperation, and form stable and closely linked core research teams, so as to continuously improve the level of discipline development.

Key words: discipline development, talent team, cooperation network, multiple linear regression

CLC Number: 

  • G255
[1] 余厚强, 白宽, 邹本涛, 等. 人工智能领域科研团队识别与领军团队提取[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(20): 4-13.
YU H Q, BAI K, ZOU B T.Identification and extraction of research team in the artificial intelligence field[J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(20): 4-13.
[2] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C, SOLDATENKOVA A. The ratio of top scientists to the academic staff as an indicator of the competitive strength of universities[J]. 2018: 1-16.
[3] 廖青云, 朱东华, 汪雪锋, 等. 科研团队的多样性对团队绩效的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2020(8): 1-18.
LIAO Q Y, ZHU D H, WANG X F, et al.A study of the impact of diversity in research teams on team performance[J]. Studies in science of science, 2020(8): 1-18.
[4] 魏立才, 黄祎. 学术流动对回国青年理工科人才科研生产力的影响研究——基于Web of science论文分析[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2020(1): 67-73.
WEI L C, HUANG Y.On the influence of academic mobility on the scientific research productivity of returned young science & engi-neering talents[J]. Higher engineering education research, 2020(1): 67-73.
[5] JONKERS K, CRUZ-CASTRO L.Research upon return: the effect of international mobility on scientific ties, production and impact[J]. Research policy, 2013, 42(8): 1366-1377.
[6] 沈佚葳, 李琦, 郭筱薇, 等. 医院学科建设与人才队伍合理性之间的关系[J]. 中华医学科研管理杂志, 2018, 31(4): 292-296.
SHEN Y W, LI Q, GUO X W, et al.The relationship between disci-pline and talent team in a hospital[J]. Chinese journal of medical research management, 2018, 31(4): 292-296.
[7] LYKOURENTZOU I, ANTONIOU A, NAUDET Y.Matching or crashing? Personality-based team formation in crowdsourcing environments[J]. Computer science, 2015, 2(1): 1-14.
[8] AZOULAY P, ZIVIN J G, WANG J.Superstar extinction[J]. Social science electronic publishing, 2010, 125(2): 549-589.
[9] 李幼军, 景琴玲. 高校科研团队学术合作对绩效影响的量化研究[J]. 财会通讯, 2020(13): 172-176.
LI Y J, JING Q L.Quantitative research on the impact of academic cooperation of university research team on performance[J]. Accounting newsletter, 2020(13): 172-176
[10] 黄超, 王雅林. 大学学科团队的网络结构及其度量[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2012(6): 120-124.
CHAO H, WANG Y.Network structure and its measurement of university disciplinary team[J]. Research in higher education of engineering, 2012(6): 120-124.
[11] 郑云涛. 基于作者合作网络的高校科研团队稳定性和凝聚力分析——以浙江农林大学为例[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(9): 246-249.
ZHENG Y T.Analysis of the stability and cohesion of scientific research teams based on the author cooperation networks-A case of scientific research team of Zhejiang agricultural and forestry university[J]. Journal of Anhui agricultural sciences, 2020, 48(9): 246-249.
[12] 阮鹏, 刘卫华, 彭云. 科研创新团队成员适宜度评价研究[J]. 中华医学科研管理杂志, 2019(3): 210-213.
RUAN P, LIU W H, PENG Y.Research on suitability evaluation of team members of scientific research and innovation team[J]. Chinese journal of medical research management, 2019(3): 210-213.
[13] 张崴, 王续琨. 研究型大学科研团队结构对团队创造力影响的实证研究[J]. 软科学, 2014, 28(3): 93-96.
ZHANG W, WANG X K.Empirical study of the influence of team structure on team creativity in research universities' research teams[J]. Soft science, 2014, 28(3): 93-96.
[14] 刘先红. 科研团队的成员合作特征分析[J]. 知识管理论坛, 2016, 1(4): 283-292.
LIU X.Analysis of collaboration characteristics among members in research teams[J]. Knowledge management forum, 2016, 1(4): 283-292.
[15] 俞立平, 潘云涛, 武夷山. 科研机构总量评价指标的改进研究——基于规模、质量、均衡的视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(24): 27-30, 84.
YU L P, PAN Y T, WU Y S.Study on summary evaluation indicator optimization of research institution - Based on the views of scale, quality and balance[J]. Library and information service, 2010, 54(24): 27-30, 84.
[16] 张剑虹. 引发科研人员队伍不稳定因素的研究[J]. 中国卫生人才, 2012(11): 81-83.
ZHANG J.Study on the factors that cause the instability of scientific research personnel[J]. Chinese health talents, 2012(11): 81-83.
[17] 邱均平, 刘国徽, 董克. 基于合作分析的知识聚合与学科知识结构研究——以国内知识管理领域为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014, 37(8): 6-11.
QIU J P, LIU G H, DONG K.Research on the knowledge aggrega-tion and subject knowledge structure based on collaboration analy-sis: a case of the field of knowledge management in China[J]. In-formation studies: Theory & application, 2014, 37(8): 6-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!