中文    English

›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 10-13.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2018.07.002

• Information forum • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Improvement of PACT Rules for International Academic Conferences Ranking

TANG Bqiun1, WANG Lingfeng2   

  1. 1. Library, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guangxi Guilin 541004, China;
    2. Business School, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guangxi Guilin 541004, China
  • Received:2017-12-04 Online:2018-07-05 Published:2018-08-25

Abstract: International conference was once a reliable basis for academic assessment in China before 2000, due to the lack of conferences held or participated by China. However, with the increasingly frequent exchanges between China and western academia, there are more and more low quality and profit oriented international conference in China. The international academic conference ranking has become the new problem for the scientific research management of universities. The current ranking rules have high demands on the quantity and reliability, while it is easy to fake with high management costs. This paper proposed a improved conference ranking rule with four indexes including paper quantity collected by conference, the diversification degree of paper author, the academic level of conference chairman and the number of conference in recent 20 years, to evaluate the quality of international academic conference and make the ranking, which was not easy to fake and had low management costs.

CLC Number: 

  • G311
[1] 严辉文.国际学术会议:人傻钱多速来[N].中国青年报,2011-5-11(2).
[2] 王凌峰. 国际会议质量分级问题与PACT方法[J].科技成果管理与研究,2013,(1):43-45.
[3] http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/multidisciplinary/webofscience/cpci/cpciessay/.
[4] http://faculty.cs.tamu.edu/guofei/sec_conf_stat.htm.
[5] http://www.cs.iit.edu/~xli/CS-Conference-Journals-Impact.htm.
[6] http://www.ssw.uni-linz.ac.at/General/Staff/CS/Research/Conferences/Rating/.
[1] ZHAO Rongying, WANG Jianpin, WANG Xu, DAI Yifan. Study on the University S&T Development Index Oriented the DoubleFirst-Class Construction [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(10): 23-30.
[2] WANG Hui. Evolution and Enlightenment of the Research Assessment in UK [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(5): 43-49.
[3] GU Xiao-ying, XIONG Ze-quan, SONG Zhen-shi, WU Jin. Study of S&T Evaluation System within the Individual Research Institutes Taking Environmental Science Subject of T University as an Example [J]. , 2016, 28(4): 79-82.
[4] Information Institute of Academy of Ningxia Agricultural and Forestry Science, Yinchuan 750002, China. Design and Implementation of Information System of Scientific Research Management: ——Taking the [J]. , 2014, 26(3): 30-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!