中文    English

›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 8-11.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2017.01.002

• Information forum • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Performance Evaluation on Psychological Contracts Between Public Library Users and Librarians

ZHANG Yiwen   

  1. Yantai Library, Yantai 264003, China
  • Received:2016-11-09 Online:2017-01-05 Published:2017-01-23

Abstract: From the perspective of reader and librarian perception, this paper made the performance evaluation on psychological contracts between users and librarians of public library based on LibQUAL evaluation mode. The results showed that the service attitude was an important index to evaluate the psychological contracts, and insufficient librarians’ service ability led the recessive imbalance of psychological contract, and the lack of users’ learning ability increased the difficulties of psychological contract maintenance. Taking 3 public libraries in Shandong Province as the research samples, it proved that public library should apply LibQUAL evaluation model for service improvement and correction according to the actual situation, and establish sustainable and objective quality evaluation model and standards to use in practice, which could provide theoretical and practical guidance for the service innovation and service ability improvement of China’s public libraries.

Key words: user perception

CLC Number: 

  • G251
[1] Argyris C.Understanding organizational behavior.Homewood II[M] .Dorsey Press Inc,1960.
[2] 顾丽平.介于用户和图书馆员的心理契约——基于问卷调查的实证研究.图书情报工作,2010,(7):63-65.
[3] COOK C,THOMPSON B.Psychometric properties of scores from The Web-based LibQUAL+ study of perceptions of library service quality.Library Trends,2001,49(4):585-605.
[4] 于良芝,谷松,赵峥.SERVQUAL于图书馆服务质量评估十年研究评述[J].大学图书馆学报,2005,(1):51-57.
[5] Kang G D.The hierarchical structure of service quality:integration of technical and functional quantity[J].ManagingServiceQuality,2006,16(1):37-50.
[6] 刘昆雄,张艳丰.高校图书馆用户与馆员的心理契约绩效评估——基于LibQUAL评价模式的实证研究[J].图书馆,2013,(2):47-49.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!