农业图书情报学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 37-48.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.25-0139

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

LLaMA人工智能大模型在高校未来学习中心应用的风险与规制

乔晋华1, 马雪赟2()   

  1. 1. 山东大学 法学院,青岛 266237
    2. 山东大学 图书馆,青岛 266237
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-03 出版日期:2025-02-05 发布日期:2025-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 马雪赟
  • 作者简介:

    乔晋华(2000- ),女,硕士,山东大学法学院,研究方向为宪法学与行政法学

  • 基金资助:
    北京信用学会重大项目“习近平总书记关于司法公信力重要论述的学理阐释”(BJCS24ZD006); 山东大学2023年度教育教学改革研究重点项目“数智时代未来学习生态建设”(2023Z21)

Risks and Regulations for Application of the LLaMA Model in University Future Learning Centers

QIAO Jinhua1, MA Xueyun2()   

  1. 1. School of Law, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237
    2. Shandong University Library, Qingdao 266237
  • Received:2025-01-03 Online:2025-02-05 Published:2025-05-20
  • Contact: MA Xueyun

摘要:

[目的/意义] 随着人工智能技术的飞速发展,LLaMA人工智能大模型在高校未来学习中心的应用逐渐兴起。本研究围绕高校未来学习中心建设需求,探究LLaMA核心技术与未来学习中心建设的耦合场景,推动图书馆向智能学习支持系统转型。 [方法/过程] 文章采用技术解构与场景验证相结合的研究方法,系统剖析了技术嵌入过程中存在的法律风险,并针对性地提出了规制路径。 [结果/结论] LLaMA人工智能大模型在高校未来学习中心应用面临三重挑战:其一,训练数据偏差导致生成内容可靠性风险;其二,用户行为轨迹留存引发的隐私泄露隐患;其三,AIGC成果在著作权法框架下的权属认定困境。对此提出相应治理路径:技术端构建动态数据清洗机制以抑制信息失真,制度端建立分级隐私保护体系防范数据泄露,法律端完善人机协同创作成果的权属分配规则,协同端形成模型迭代优化的闭环反馈系统。高校未来学习中心优化应用LLaMA大模型,需要兼顾技术创新与法律规制,通过技术优化、风险控制及相关规制出台,推动其应用发展,促进人工智能与教育教学的融合发展。

关键词: 未来学习中心, 高校图书馆, LLaMA, 生成式人工智能, AIGC, 大语言模型

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology is transforming various sectors, particularly in higher education. The LLaMA (Large Language Model Meta AI) represents a significant innovation in this arena, making its application within university future learning centers increasingly important. As institutions of higher education strive to create environments conducive to learning and growth, understanding the construction requirements of future learning centers becomes paramount. This study delves into the integration of LLaMA core technologies in these learning spaces and emphasizes the importance of evolving libraries into intelligent learning support systems. [Method/Process] The methodology employed in this research combines technical deconstruction and scenes for validation, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the legal risks associated with embedding advanced technologies in educational frameworks. By systematically examining these potential risks, the study aims to establish a well-rounded perspective on the implications of AI deployment in educational settings. [Results/Conclusions] The study identifies three principal challenges encountered in the application of the LLaMA within university learning centers. The first challenge arises from reliability risks linked to content generated by the AI, which may be affected by biases present in the training data. Such biases can lead to the dissemination of inaccurate or misleading information, undermining the trustworthiness of educational resources. Secondly, there are privacy leakage risks, particularly associated with the retention of user behavioral data. As AI systems analyze user interactions, there is a potential for sensitive information to be exposed or misused, raising concerns about student privacy and data security. The third challenge involves ownership determination dilemmas regarding the content generated through AI-driven creative processes. These dilemmas are intricately tied to existing copyright law frameworks, which may not adequately address the complexities introduced by human-machine collaboration in content creation. In response to these challenges, the study proposes several pathways for governance aimed at effectively navigating the landscape of AI in education. It suggests the implementation of dynamic data cleansing mechanisms to address reliability risks and inaccuracies. Additionally, establishing tiered privacy protection systems can help safeguard against user data breaches. Legal frameworks also need refinement to ensure clear ownership distribution for outputs of human-machine collaboration. Ultimately, optimizing the application of the LLaMA model in university future learning centers necessitates a careful balance between technological innovation and legal regulation. By focusing on technical refinement, risk control, and relevant regulatory measures, the development and application of AI can be advanced, facilitating a more integrated evolution of artificial intelligence and educational practices.

Key words: future learning centers, university libraries, LLaMA, generative artificial intelligence, AIGC, LLM

中图分类号:  G250.7

引用本文

乔晋华, 马雪赟. LLaMA人工智能大模型在高校未来学习中心应用的风险与规制[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2025, 37(2): 37-48.

QIAO Jinhua, MA Xueyun. Risks and Regulations for Application of the LLaMA Model in University Future Learning Centers[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(2): 37-48.