从幕后走向台前：信息科学领域自我民族志研究回顾

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0834

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 自我民族志是一种关注研究者自我主体性、自我意识和亲身体验的人类学方法,作为一种新的“唤起式”的写作实践,在信息科学研究中尚未得到广泛关注。[方法/过程] 本研究从研究主题、运用方式、优越性及局限性等方面归纳了信息科学研究中运用自我民族志方法的研究。[结果/结论] 自我民族志的优越性体现在研究视角、研究手段和研究发现呈现方面,其适用性程度取决于研究对象和研究问题的属性。

关键词: 民族志, 自我民族志, 信息科学领域, 研究回顾

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Autoethnography offers an anthropological approach to illuminating researchers' subjectivity, self-consciousness and personal experience. As a kind of "evocative" practice, it has not been paid attention in academic field of information science. [Method/Process] This study analyzes the application of autoethnography in the information science research in terms of research topics, forms, advantages and limitations. [Results/Conclusions] The superiority of self-ethnography is reflected in research perspectives, research methods, and the presentation of research findings, and its applicability depends on the nature of research subject and of the research question.

Key words: ethnography, autoethnography, information science field, literature review

中图分类号:

G252

郑光纯, 张钰浩, 闫慧. 从幕后走向台前：信息科学领域自我民族志研究回顾[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(2): 40-47.

ZHENG Guangchun, ZHANG Yuhao, YAN Hui. From Backburner to the Forefront: Review of the Application of Autoethnography in the Information Science Field[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(2): 40-47.

参考文献

[1] 高丙中. 民族志发展的三个时代[J]. 广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2006(3): 64-69.
GAO B Z.The three periods in the development of ethnography-translator's preface to writing culture[J]. Journal of Guangxi university for nationalities(philosophy and social science edition), 2006(3): 64-69.
[2] 王彦兵, 郑菲. 民族志方法在图书情报领域中的运用[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2016(3): 29-33.
WANG Y B, ZHENG F.Application of ethnographic methods in the field of library and information science[J]. Library theory and practice, 2016(3): 29-33.
[3] GUZIK E.Representing ourselves in information science research: A methodological essay on autoethnography[J]. Canadian journal of information and library science, 2013, 37(4): 267-283.
[4] REED-DANAHAY D E. Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social[M]. Berg publishers, 1997.
[5] CHANG H.Autoethnography as method[M]. Walnut creek, CA: Left coast press, 2008.
[6] 蒋逸民. 自我民族志: 质性研究方法的新探索[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2011(4): 11-18.
JIANG Y M.Autoethnography: A new exploration of qualitative research methods[J]. Zhejiang social sciences, 2011(4): 11-18.
[7] MICHELS D H.The place of the person in LIS research: An exploration in methodology and representation[J]. Canadian journal of information & library science, 2010, 34(2): 161-183.
[8] LOPATOVSKA I, SMILEY B. Proposed model of information behaviour in crisis: The case of hurricane sandy[J]. Information research, 2014, 19(1). [2021-10-31]. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1020676.pdf.
[9] KRAMER E H.A close look: Roving reference in a community college library information commons[J]. Reference services review, 2020, 48(2): 271-285.
[10] CAIN C C, TRAUTH E M.Black men in IT: Theorizing an autoethnography of a black man's journey into IT within the United States of America[J]. SIGMIS database, 2017, 48(2): 35-51.
[11] BADENHORST C, XU X.Academic publishing: Making the implicit explicit[J]. Preprints, 2016, 4(3): 24.
[12] MCINTYRE J.Blank pages, brief notes and ethical double-binds: Micro digitisation and the infinite archive[J]. Archives & manuscripts, 2016, 44(1): 2-13.
[13] BLACKBURN F.Community engagement, cultural competence and two Australian public libraries and indigenous communities[J]. IFLA journal, 2017, 43(3): 288-301.
[14] BORDONARO K.Adult learning theories and autoethnography:Informing the practice of information literacy[J]. IFLA journal, 2020, 46(2): 163-171.
[15] COOKE N A.Leading with love and hospitality: Applying a radical pedagogy to LIS[J]. Information & learning science, 2018, 120(1/2): 119-132.
[16] MORRISO K L.Informed asset-based pedagogy: Coming correct, counter-stories from an information literacy classroom[J]. Librarytrends, 2017, 66(2): 176-218.
[17] DIRNDORFER ANDERSON T.Collaborative autoethnography as a way of seeing the experience of care giving as an information practice[J]. Information research, 2015, 20(1): 170-182.
[18] ANDERSON T D, FOURIE I.Falling together - A conceptual paper on the complexities of information interactions and research gaps in empathetic care for the dying[J]. Information research. 2017, 22(1): 1-22.
[19] SCHLESSELMAN-TARANGO G.Reproductive failure and information work: An autoethnography[J]. Library trends, 2019, 67(3): 436-454.
[20] JENNIFER D, ALLISON M.From the sidelines to the center: Reconsidering the potential of the personal in archives[J]. Archival science, 2018, 18(3): 1-21.
[21] GORICHANAZ T.Information on the run: Experiencing information during an ultramarathon[J]. Information research, 2015, 20(4): 149-160.
[22] HYATT E.The information behaviour of pacific crest trail thru-hikers: An autoethnographic pilot study[J]. Information research, 2017, 22(1): 1-7.
[23] WALL S.Easier said than done: Writing an autoethnography[J].
International journal of qualitative methods. 2008, 7(1): 38-53.
[24] ELLIS C.Heartful autoethnography[J]. Qualitative health research, 1999, 9(5): 669-683.
[25] DAN G, BARBARA S.Community resilience and the role of the public library[J]. Library trends, 2013, 61(3): 513-541.
[26] RICHARDSON L.Nine poems marriage and the family[J]. Journal of contemporary ethnography, 1994, 23(1): 3-13.
[27] 大卫·费特曼. 龚建华译. 民族志: 步步深入(第3版)[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2013.
DAVID M F.GONG J H(trans). Ethnography: Step-by-step 3ed[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing university press, 2013.
[28] 于良芝, 刘怡君. 现象学、现象图析学与信息用户研究的经验范式——信息经验研究的理论基础、核心概念与方法论评析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2021, 47(3): 43-57.
YU L Z, LIU Y J.Phenomenology, phenomenography and the experience-based paradigm of user studies: Philosophical foundation, core concepts and methodology of information experience research[J].Journal of library science in China, 2021, 47(3): 43-57.