农业图书情报学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 65-75.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.26-0097

• “公共文化服务直达基层”专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

乡村新型公共文化空间的发展模式与优化路径研究

苗美娟, 罗喆, 冯偌涵, 刘洁()   

  1. 对外经济贸易大学 政府管理学院,北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-07 出版日期:2026-03-05 发布日期:2026-03-30
  • 通讯作者: 刘洁
  • 作者简介:

    苗美娟(1989- ),副教授,对外经济贸易大学政府管理学院,研究方向为公共文化、乡村文化振兴

    罗喆(2002- ),硕士研究生,对外经济贸易大学政府管理学院,研究方向为公共文化。

    冯偌涵(2003- ),硕士研究生,对外经济贸易大学政府管理学院,研究方向为公共文化

  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目“健全现代公共文化服务体系研究”(23AZD050); 对外经济贸易大学党建研究课题“结对帮扶背景下高校基层党组织服务‘一带一路’与‘乡村振兴’战略路径研究”(DJ20250202)

Development Models and Optimization Pathways of New Rural Public Cultural Spaces

MIAO Meijuan, LUO Zhe, FENG Ruohan, LIU Jie()   

  1. School of Government, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029
  • Received:2026-02-07 Online:2026-03-05 Published:2026-03-30
  • Contact: LIU Jie

摘要:

[目的/意义] 乡村新型公共文化空间是新时代乡村振兴与公共文化服务高质量发展的实践创新,也是推动城乡公共文化服务一体发展的关键载体。本研究旨在系统分析乡村新型公共文化空间的生成模式与运行逻辑,探讨其高质量发展的深化路径。 [方法/过程] 基于2024年9月至2025年3月对北京、山东、浙江等地40余处乡村新型公共文化空间的实地调研与访谈,结合案例归纳与比较分析,对其主要类型、建设运营模式与生成路径进行系统梳理,并提炼共性运行机制。 [结果/结论] 研究发现,乡村新型公共文化空间涵盖了公共阅读、艺术普及、地方文化展示、文旅融合及数字文化体验等多元类型。建设运营模式上形成了政府主导建设、多元运营,社会主导建设运营以及多方协同共建共营3种主要权责结构。发展路径上呈现出地方文化依托型、产业驱动型、景区嵌入型、生态融合型及社区服务型等差异化特征。运行机制层面普遍依托嵌入式运行、在地化融入、活动驱动、多元协同、情感叙事及轻资产运作等机制实现持续运转。“十五五”高质量发展时期,应通过空间布局优化、内容供给强化、特色路径塑造与社会化运营机制完善等协同推进,使乡村新型公共文化空间更好嵌入乡村整体发展体系。

关键词: 新型公共文化空间, 乡村振兴, 公共文化服务

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] New rural public cultural spaces represents an innovative approach to advancing rural revitalization and the high-quality development of public cultural services in the new era. They also serve as a key vehicle for promoting the integrated development of urban and rural public cultural services. This study aims to systematically analyze the development models and operational logic of new rural public cultural spaces and to explore pathways for their high-quality advancement. [Method/Process] Based on field investigations and interviews conducted between September 2024 and March 2025 at more than 40 new rural public cultural spaces in Beijing, Shandong, Zhejiang and other regions, this study employs case induction and comparative analysis to systematically examine their major types, construction and operational models, and development pathways, and to distill their common operational mechanisms. [Results/Conclusions] The findings indicate that new rural public cultural spaces encompass diverse types, including public reading spaces, art promotion spaces, local cultural exhibition spaces, culture-tourism integration spaces and digital cultural experience spaces. In terms of construction and operational models, three main governance structures have emerged: government-led construction with diversified operation, society-led construction and operation, and multi-stakeholder collaborative co-construction and co-management. These models exhibit significant differences in the allocation of responsibilities and rights, resource distribution and operational approaches. Regarding development pathways, due to variations in resource endowments, development motivations and target service groups, new rural public cultural spaces demonstrate diversified development patterns, including local culture-based, industry-driven, scenic-area-embedded, eco-integrated and community-oriented models. Despite differences in construction models and development pathways, new rural public cultural spaces have gradually formed several common operational mechanisms in practice, mainly including embedded operation, localized integration, activity-driven development, multi-stakeholder collaboration, emotional narrative construction and light-asset operation. The pathways for promoting the high-quality development of new rural public cultural spaces during the 15th Five-Year Plan period mainly include the following: 1) Optimizing spatial layout. This involves strengthening the integration and functional coupling of existing public cultural facilities, promoting the cultural regeneration of idle rural buildings, and building a symbiotic matrix linking cultural spaces with cultural and tourism industry nodes, thereby embedding new rural public cultural spaces more effectively into the overall rural development system. 2) Enhancing content provision. By deeply exploring local cultural resources, distinctive cultural brands with strong local identity can be developed. At the same time, professional teams should be introduced to design themed cultural activities, forming a content ecosystem that integrates local cultural resources with modern creativity. 3) Promoting differentiated development. Functional configurations should be determined according to local cultural resource endowments and actual service needs, encouraging new rural public cultural spaces to develop differentiated positioning and complementary functions. 4) Advancing socialized operation. By further developing the "space curator" mechanism for rural cultural spaces and establishing an institutional support system aligned with socialized operation, the vitality of social participation can be effectively stimulated.

Key words: new rural public cultural space, rural revitalization, public cultural service

中图分类号:  G250.1

引用本文

苗美娟, 罗喆, 冯偌涵, 刘洁. 乡村新型公共文化空间的发展模式与优化路径研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2026, 38(3): 65-75.

MIAO Meijuan, LUO Zhe, FENG Ruohan, LIU Jie. Development Models and Optimization Pathways of New Rural Public Cultural Spaces[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2026, 38(3): 65-75.