中文    English

Journal of library and information science in agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 13-22.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.26-0120

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Library Transformation in the Age of AI Agents: Service Reconfiguration and Governance Framework Based on the OpenClaw Architecture

LIU Wei1,2, JIN Jiaqin2,3   

  1. 1.Institute of Information Studies, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai 200235
    2.School of Cultural Heritage and Information Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444
    3.Shanghai Library (Shanghai Institute of Scientific and Technical Information), Shanghai 200031
  • Received:2026-03-16 Online:2026-04-05 Published:2026-04-15

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence technologies from dialogue-based generation to autonomous task execution marks a paradigm shift with profound implications for library services. A new generation of AI agents, exemplified by the open-source project OpenClaw, can independently plan multi-step tasks, invoke external tools, operate computer interfaces through visual perception, and deliver structured work products with minimal human intervention. The shift from "answering questions" to "completing tasks" fundamentally challenges the traditional library service model. The model has long been based on the idea that librarians serve as the primary connection between information resources and users. Libraries worldwide are facing an increasing structural tension: their collections are expanding while their staffing levels are remaining constrained, resulting in unmet knowledge service demands. Agent technologies, with their capabilities for autonomous planning, tool invocation, environmental perception, and persistent memory, offer a potential pathway to address this gap. However, the library community currently lacks a systematic analytical framework through which to understand how this technology paradigm intersects with existing service architectures, governance requirements, and organizational structures. This study addresses this gap by providing both a conceptual framework for analyzing agent technologies in the library context and practical guidance for their implementation and governance, contributing to the broader discourse on intelligent library transformation as articulated in national science and technology development strategies. [Method/Process] This study employs a multi-method research design with OpenClaw as the primary analytical lens. The technical architecture analysis involves systematic examination of OpenClaw's publicly available documentation, GitHub source code repository, and official technical publications. Four core mechanisms are deconstructed in detail: the Computer Use Agent paradigm, which enables vision-driven interface operation through periodic screen capture, multimodal language model interpretation, and simulated mouse and keyboard actions; the local-first architecture with model-agnostic design, which maintains data sovereignty through a decentralized gateway-node topology while supporting flexible switching among multiple large language models; the Heartbeat mechanism, which transforms the agent from a passive responder into a proactive monitor through a condition-triggered self-inspection cycles; and the Model Context Protocol, an open standard for tool integration that enables any MCP-compliant agent to invoke standardized service capabilities. Case comparison analysis evaluates two contrasting platform approaches for supporting agent deployment in libraries - FOLIO Eureka, representing the next-generation Library Service Platform pathway with its microservice architecture, API gateway, and event-driven communication, and the Cloud Alliance's A-LSP, representing an agent-native design philosophy that positions intelligent agents as the core organizational principle of library service platforms. Policy document analysis examines the IFLA Guide on the Introduction of AI in Libraries, China's New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan, the Data Security Law, and the Personal Information Protection Law, as well as regional policy experiments in agent technology promotion. Security incident case studies draw from the ClawHavoc supply chain attack, which compromised over 21 000 active instances; Cisco Talos security audits, which revealed prompt injection vulnerabilities; and CrowdStrike threat assessments, which identified misconfiguration risks that could transform agents into attack vectors. [Results/Conclusions] The study proposed a critical distinction between "narrow OpenClaw" (the specific open-source product and its derivative ecosystem) and "broad OpenClaw" (the agent technology paradigm it represents), arguing that libraries must engage strategically with both dimensions while avoiding the twin pitfalls of conflating technology trends with product procurement decisions or dismissing an entire paradigm based on the limitations of a single product. The narrow application analysis identified three viable deployment scenarios - personal productivity tools for librarians, information collection and subject monitoring, and reader-facing service prototyping - while documenting associated risks in technical stability, supply chain security, and regulatory compliance. The broad paradigm analysis revealed five structural impacts on libraries: diversification of service entry points through embedded integration, transformation from reactive response to proactive push services, evolution of reader information behaviors from search to delegation, disruption of commercial ecosystems including usage-based pricing models, and fundamental repositioning of libraries as knowledge infrastructure in the AI ecosystem. Four architectural prerequisites for agent deployment were identified: API openness, event-driven capabilities, permission governance, and observability, with insufficient system openness identified as the primary bottleneck that constrains implementation. Three differentiated implementation pathways were proposed with corresponding phased strategies. A comprehensive governance framework has been constructed encompassing six dimensions: system security with defense-in-depth measures, data governance and privacy protection aligned with national legislation, ethical standards addressing algorithmic bias and hallucination risks, copyright compliance addressing the ambiguity of agent-mediated access under existing licensing agreements, human-agent collaboration through a tiered oversight system, and standardization initiatives including library-specific MCP tool standards. The study also proposed institutional innovations such as "agent sandbox zones" that allow controlled experimentation in isolated environments. The research concluded that the highly structured and process-oriented nature of library workflows makes libraries a particularly suitable domain for agent technology adoption, but successful implementation depends on the coordinated advancement of technical readiness, governance maturity, and organizational change capacity. Limitations of this study include the nascent stage of actual agent deployment in libraries, which means the proposed frameworks await empirical validation. Future research directions include conducting empirical studies of library agent deployments, developing standardization pathways for cross-library agent collaboration, investigating copyright licensing adaptation mechanisms for agent-mediated access, and examining the long-term impact of agent technologies on the library profession and library science education.

Key words: AI agents, OpenClaw, smart libraries, service reconfiguration, computer-use agent, model context protocol, generative engine optimization, governance framework

CLC Number: 

  • G250
[1] Shen Minjie, Li Yanshu, Chen Lulu, et al. From mind to machine: The rise of manus AI as a fully autonomous digital agent[PP/OL]. V3. arXiv (2026-03-19)[2026-03-14]. .
[2] Xi Zhiheng, Chen Wenxiang, Guo Xin, et al. The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey[J]. Science China Information Sciences, 2025, 68(2): 121101.
[3] 国务院. 新一代人工智能发展规划[EB/OL]. [2026-03-14]. .
[4] IFLA. IFLA guide on the introduction of AI in libraries[EB/OL]. [2026-03-14]. .
[5] 上海图书馆(上海科学技术情报研究所), 深圳市海恒智能科技有限公司, 智慧图书馆技术应用联盟. 智慧图书馆AI馆员应用白皮书(征求意见稿V 0.9)[EB/OL]. [2026-03-14]. .
[6] 刘炜, 张磊, 嵇婷, 等. 以AI塑形智慧图书馆: 基于智能体的下一代图书馆服务平台[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2025, 37(5): 15-26.
Liu Wei, Zhang Lei, Ji Ting, et al. Shaping the smart libraries with AI: An agent-based, next-generation library service platform[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2025, 37(5): 15-26.
[7] 深圳市人民政府. 福田推出全国首个AI图书馆助手"福鹭鹭"[EB/OL].[2026-03-14]. .
[8] Kaushal V, Yadav R. The role of chatbots in academic libraries: An experience-based perspective[J]. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 2022, 71(3): 215-232.
[9] Rodriguez S, Mune C. Uncoding library chatbots: Deploying a new virtual reference tool at the San Jose State University library[J]. Reference Services Review, 2022, 50(3/4): 392-405.
[10] Aboelmaged M, Bani-Melhem S, Ahmad Al-Hawari M, et al. Conversational AI Chatbots in library research: An integrative review and future research agenda[J]. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2025, 57(2): 331-347.
[11] Kim J. Academic library with generative AI: From passive information providers to proactive knowledge facilitators[J]. Publications, 2025, 13(3): 37.
[12] Boateng F. The transformative potential of Generative AI in academic library access services: Opportunities and challenges[J]. Information Services and Use, 2025, 45(1/2): 140-147.
[13] Sousa N. Ethical and practical implications of AI in academic library research[J]. IFLA Journal, 2025: 03400352251391753.
[14] Mwantimwa K, Msoffe G. Application of generative artificial intelligence in library operations and service delivery: A scoping review[J]. Technical Services Quarterly, 2025, 42(2): 139-168.
[15] Raghavendra G, Mallya J, Payini V. Generative artificial intelligence in library and information science literature: A structured systematic review[J]. Cogent Education, 2025, 12(1): 2591500.
[16] Vargo S L, Lusch R F. Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2016, 44(1): 5-23.
[17] OpenClaw. Readme[EB/OL]. [2026-03-14]. .
[18] Steinberger P. OpenClaw vision[EB/OL]. [2026-03-14]. .
[19] OpenClaw. Releases[EB/OL]. [2026-03-14]. .
[20] Documentation OpenClaw. Gateway architecture[EB/OL]. [2026-03-14]. .
[21] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国数据安全法[EB/OL]. (2021-06-10)[2026-03-14]. .
[22] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国个人信息保护法[EB/OL]. (2021-08-20)[2026-03-14]. .
[23] Documentation OpenClaw. Heartbeat[EB/OL]. [2026-03-14]. .
[24] Anthropic. Introducing the model context protocol[EB/OL].[2026-03-14]. .
[25] Anthropic. Model context protocol specification[EB/OL]. [2026-03-14]. .
[26] Peng S, Kalliamvakou E, Cihon P, et al. The impact of AI on developer productivity: evidence from GitHub Copilot[J/OL]. Communications of the ACM, 2024, 67(3): 54-63. .
[27] Cyberpress. ClawHavoc poisons OpenClaw's ClawHub with 1 184 malicious skills[EB/OL].[2026-03-14]. .
[28] CISCO. Personal AI agents like OpenClaw are a security nightmare[EB/OL].[2026-03-14]. .
[29] Crowdstrike. What security teams need to know about OpenClaw, the AI super agent[EB/OL]. [2026-03-14]. .
[30] IFLA. IFLA statement on copyright and artificial intelligence(AI)[EB/OL].[2026-03-14]. .
[1] QIAN Li, YANG Yanxi, ZHANG Yuanzhe, HU Maodi, CHANG Zhijun. The Impacts and Implications of OpenClaw for Scientific and Technical Literature Intelligence Work [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2026, 38(4): 4-12.
[2] LI Baiyang, REN Shangsheng. Technical Evolution and Application Scenarios of Open-Source Agents:A Case Study of "OpenClaw" [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2026, 38(4): 23-35.
[3] LIU Wei, ZHANG Lei, JI Ting, CHEN Xiaoyang. Shaping the Smart Libraries with AI: An Agent-based, Next-Generation Library Service Platform [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(5): 15-26.
[4] SANG Yuanyuan. Multimodal Learning Technology Aimed at Exploring the Innovative Path of Library Intelligence Service [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(3): 42-52.
[5] GUO Limin, LIU Yueru, FU Yaming. Design and Transformation Pathways of Library Systems Driven by Generative Agents [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(12): 36-47.
[6] Jiaxin HUANG, Xiaofang ZHANG. Application Models and Innovative Approaches of Smart Libraries from the Perspective of MR Technology [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(9): 78-88.
[7] ZHANG Mingjie, ZHAO Ruixue. Emotion Perception and Service Optimization in ChatGPT-Driven Smart Libraries [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(12): 74-88.
[8] XIA Yikun, JIANG Jie, ZHANG Xiaheng, WANG Jiandong, ZHOU Wenjie, YANG Xinya, LI Yang. Developing the New Quality Productivity: Responses and Reflections on the Discipline of Information Resource Management [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(1): 4-32.
[9] ZHOU Zhenguo. Data Governance Research from the Perspective of Governance Framework [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2020, 32(7): 57-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!