中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 74-82.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0344

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Data Usability of Book Rating Scores on Social Reading Platform from the Perspective of Altmetrics Evaluation: A Case Study of Douban Reading

LAN Xue, HAN Yi*   

  1. College of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715
  • Received:2021-05-06 Online:2021-11-05 Published:2021-12-03

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Analyzing the correlation between book citations and book rating score on Douban reading platform, this paper explores the usability of book rating data on social reading platform as Altmetrics evaluation indicators for academic books. [Method/Process] The citation number and Douban rating data of each category books were obtained respectively. The coefficient of Pearson correlation and Spearman correlation were calculated, and the correlation coefficient between the citations of different categories books and the Douban rating score was used to reveal the usability of the rating data of books on the social reading platforms as Altmetrics evaluation data. [Results/Conclusions] There is a certain degree of usability for Altmetrics evaluation in the scores of books on social reading platforms, but there are differences in the usability of the scores of books of different categories on social reading platforms.

Key words: social reading platform, Douban, book evaluation, Altmetrics, data usability

CLC Number: 

  • G256
[1] 张云, 茆意宏. 社会化阅读平台的用户互动关系探析——以“豆瓣读书”用户行为为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014, 37(12): 99-103.
ZHANG Y, MAO Y H.Analysis of the user interactive relationship in social reading platform[J]. Information studies: Theory & application, 2014, 37(12): 99-103.
[2] 钟雄. 社会化阅读: 阅读的未来[N]. 中国新闻出版报, 2011-5-12(6).
ZHONG X. Social reading: The future of reading[N]. China press and publishing journal, 2011-5-12(6).
[3] 梁育浩. 豆瓣网社会化阅读平台的发展研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2016.
LIANG Y H.Research on the development of Douban's social reading platform[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing university, 2016.
[4] 王兰敬, 叶继元. 中文人文社会科学学术图书评价的瓶颈因素及对策研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2014(6): 82-87.
WANG L J, YE J Y.Bottleneck factors and countermeasures of the evaluation of Chinese academic book in humanities and social sciences[J]. Library & information, 2014(6): 82-87.
[5] 何峻. 我国图书评价现状分析[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2012, 30(3):106-110.
HE J.An analysis on book evaluation research in China[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2012, 30(3): 106-110.
[6] 陈芳芳. 一个用于评价图书馆图书使用效益的数学模型[J]. 科技信息(学术研究), 2008(6): 92-94.
CHEN F F.A mathematical model for evaluating the use efficiency of library books[J]. Scientific and technological information (academic research), 2008(6): 92-94.
[7] 张海营. 基于RFM模型的图书馆图书评价系统研究[J]. 图书馆, 2012(3): 60-62.
ZHANG H Y.The book evaluation system based on RFM model of library. Library, 2012(3): 60-62.
[8] WHITE H D, BOELL S K, YU H, et al.Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences[J]. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2009, 60(6): 1083-1096.
[9] 杨思洛, 王皓, 文庭孝. 基于引文分析的图书影响力研究——以图书情报领域为例[J]. 情报资料工作, 2010(1): 89-92.
YANG S L, WANG H, WEN T X.Book influence studies based on citation analysis with library and information science as example[J]. Information and documentation services, 2010(1): 89-92.
[10] 杨思洛, 曹慧, 李慧玲. 基于引文分析的档案学领域图书影响力研究[J]. 档案与建设, 2014(5): 9-13.
YANG S L, CAO H, LI H L.Research on books influence of archival science based on citation analysis[J]. Archives & construction, 2014(5): 9-13.
[11] 雷淑义, 吕先竞. Altmetrics视角下的学术图书影响力评价研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 2017, 38(6): 225-231.
LEI S Y, LV X J.Impact evaluation of academic books from the perspective of Altmetrics[J]. Journal of southwest Minzu university (humanities and social science), 2017, 38(6): 225-231.
[12] 魏佳文, 韩毅. 中文学术图书的Altmetrics数据生成动机及数据可用性探析——以豆瓣读书平台“短评”为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(2): 98-106.
WEI J W, HAN Y.Generation motivation of Altmetrics data and its availability to evaluate Chinese academic books: A case study of "short comments" on Douban reading platform[J]. Library and infor-mation service, 2021, 65(2): 98-106.
[13] 姜春林, 郭琪琴, 张光耀. 基于Bookmetrix学术图书评价指标的学科特征研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(8): 193-202.
JIANG C L, GUO Q Q, ZHANG G Y.Bookmetrix-based discipline characteristics analysis of the academic book assessment indexes[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2020, 39(8): 193-202.
[14] 肖敖夏, 杨思洛. Bookmetrix指标在学术图书影响力评价中的应用[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2020, 40(9): 79-85.
XIAO A X, YANG S L.The application of bookmetrix in the evaluation of academic book impact[J]. Library tribune, 2020, 40(9): 79-85.
[15] 韩毅. 非正式交流回归语境下科技评价的融合路径取向[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016, 42(4): 64-74.
HAN Y.The aggregation path orientation of scientific and technological evaluation under the revival context of informal communication[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2016, 42(4): 64-74.
[16] 张玉, 潘云涛, 袁军鹏, 等. 论多维视角下中文科技图书学术影响力评价体系的构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(7): 69-76.
ZHANG Y, PAN Y T, YUAN J P, et al.The construction of academic impact evaluation system of sci-tech books in China under multiple dimensions[J]. Library and information service, 2015, 59(7): 69-76.
[17] 王伟, 杨建林. 人文社会科学外译图书评价指标体系研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(4): 61-69.
WANG W, YANG J L.Research on the evaluation index system of external translation books in humanities and social sciences[J].Library and information service, 2019, 63(4): 61-69.
[18] 李建中, 杜小勇. 大数据可用性理论、方法和技术专题前言[J]. 软件学报, 2016, 27(7): 1603-1604.
LI J Z, DU X Y.Introduction to big data usability theory, methodologies and techniques[J]. Journal of software, 2016, 27(7): 1603-1604.
[19] 聂磊, 王延飞. 网络行为数据的适用性评估问题初探[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(6): 29-34.
NIE L, WANG Y F.A preliminary study about the adequacy evalu-ation of internet behavior data[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(6): 29-34.
[20] 北京世纪读秀技术有限公司. 读秀中文图书被引用情况报告[EB/OL]. [2021-03-05]. http://ref.duxiu.com/RefReport/quote?keyword=RefReport&word=&id=22&currentPage=1.
BEIJINGDUXIU TECHNOLOGY CO, LTD. The citation statistics of Chinese books from Duxiu[EB/OL]. [2021-03-05]. http://ref.duxiu.com/RefReport/quote?keyword=RefReport&word=&id=22&currentPage=1.
[1] LI Xiaohui, WANG Jue, LANG Linfang. Academic Impact of Retracted Dissertations and Theses [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(7): 46-53.
[2] CHEN Yunwei. Review on Quantitative Methods of Science and Technology Evaluation [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(8): 4-11.
[3] YANG Siluo, YU Yonghao. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Papers and Books Based on Citation and Altmetric Indicators [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(5): 5-12.
[4] LIU Chunli, LIU Liping, MA Fengmao. Research Status and Application Challenges of Altmetrics to Evaluate the Social Impact of Scientific Research Output [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(5): 13-20.
[5] YU Houqiang, YIN Zihan, LI Longfei, CHANG Mengli. Study of Ways of Scientific Usage of Altmetrics Data Based on User Cases [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(5): 21-27.
[6] YU Yisheng, LIU Xinyan. Research on the Influence Evaluation of Altmetrics Hot Papers from the Perspective of Citation Indicators [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(5): 28-36.
[7] ZHANG Yao. Research on Altmetric Indicators Evaluation system Model Based on Highly Cited Papers in Chinese Journals [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(5): 37-42.
[8] ZHANG Yang, YU Yanhui, HUANG Danqing. Comparison between High Attention Papers and ESI Hot Papers: A Case Study of Clinical Medicine [J]. , 2018, 30(10): 13-22.
[9] YANG Siluo, CHENG Aijuan, YUAN Qingli. Research on Three Dimensional Measuring Method of Papers' Influence Based on Altmetrics [J]. , 2018, 30(10): 5-12.
[10] HOU Zhiai. Research on the User Education and Evaluation of University Libraries in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei [J]. , 2017, 29(5): 121-124.
[11] LIANG Chun. Mass Reading in the Network Environment: A case of Douban.com [J]. , 2016, 28(4): 120-122.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!