中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 32-41.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2020.01.10-0006

• Research paper • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on Service Quality Evaluation of Trademark Agency

SHI Qing1, XU Qing2, WANG Xinglu1, HAN Xiaotong1, WANG Xuefeng1   

  1. 1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081;
    2. Beijing Mengzhi Network Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 102200
  • Received:2019-12-17 Online:2020-04-05 Published:2020-04-28

Abstract: [Purpose / Significance] In recent years, China's trademark agency service industry has been developing rapidly. However, neither national standards nor industry standards have been established for trademark agency services. This study aims to provide insights into the ways of improviding China's trademark agency service quality management. What's worse, the normalization of agency services is unsatisfactory and the quality of agency service is uneven. [Method / Process]Based on the SERVQUAL scale, this paper builds a seven-dimensional evaluation index system of service quality of trademark agent by adding two evaluation indicators, namely "service remediation" and "management information system". Meanwhile, we took Q Company's trademark agency service business as the research object for empirical analysis. [Results / Conclusions] The result shows that the overall service quality of Q company's trademark agency is acceptable, but there is still room for improvement in the specific seven dimensions of the evaluation index system. On this basis, it proposes the improvement measures for the establishment of a comprehensive service quality management system, the establishment of a standard system for agency service, the further optimization of the management information system and the improvement of the comprehensive service capabilities of personnel.

Key words: trademark agency, service quality, evaluation index system, analytic hierarchy process

CLC Number: 

  • G251
[1] 国务院.国务院关于推动创新创业高质量发展打造“双创”升级版的意见[EB/OL].[2018-09-26].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-09/26/content_5325472.htm.
[2] 工业和信息化部发展改革委财政部国资委.促进大中小企业融通发展三年行动计划[EB/OL].[2018-11-28].http://www.miit.gov.cn/n1146295/n1652858/n1652930/n3757016/c6514036/content.html.
[3] 胡刚.商标代理服务进入多元化时代[N].中国知识产权报,2013-04-26(036).
[4] Gronroos C.A service quality model and its marketing implications[J].European Journal of Marketing,1984,18(4):36-44.
[5] 《关于知识产权服务标准体系建设的指导意见》政策解读[J].河南科技,2016(08):84-85.
[6] 潘瑾,陈媛.创意产业知识产权中介服务质量满意度评价指标体系的构建[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(06):171-173.
[7] 孟馨. 服务质量、感知价值与顾客满意度的关系研究[D].浙江理工大学,2012.
[8] 张巧. 技术转移服务质量影响因素研究[D].大连理工大学,2016.
[9] 汪雪锋,王兴璐,师擎,刘晓豫.知识产权服务质量评价体系构建思考[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版),2019,21(03):24-30.
[10] 王金勇,崔娜.商标代理机构申请注册商标的法律规制体系亟需完善[J].中华商标,2018(01):34-35.
[11] 胡翔菲. 知识产权服务业人才问题研究[D].对外经济贸易大学,2015.
[12] 刘菊芳. 论改革开放背景下知识产权服务业发展[J].中国发明与专利,2018,15(08):57-68.
[13] 张玮. 服务质量、顾客满意度与酒店顾客忠诚度实证研究[J].旅游纵览(下半月),2012(07):80-82.
[14] 刘莹昕,刘飒,王威尧.层次分析法的权重计算及其应用[J].沈阳大学学报(自然科学版),2014,26(05):372-375.
[15] 徐清. Q公司商标代理服务质量评价研究[D].北京理工大学,2019.
[1] ZHOU Ying, LI Nan. Information Service Quality Evaluation of Mobile Libraries Under 5G Environment [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(3): 4-14.
[2] WANG Guokai. Identification of Influencing Factors of Health Information Service Quality in Public Libraries Based on Fuzzy DANP [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(10): 33-43.
[3] LYU Kun, CHEN Yaoyao, XIANG Minhao. Influencing Factors of Sina Weibo Information Service Quality from the Perspective of Users: Exploratory Analysis Based on Grounded Theory [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(10): 70-81.
[4] MENG Yintao, ZHAO Leixia, YU Qianqian. Scientific Data Evaluation Index System for Scientific Data Preservation [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(12): 48-59.
[5] ZHAI Xiufeng, HU Damin. Intelligence Guidance and Evaluation System of Information Resources for Reading Therapy [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(7): 29-35.
[6] WANG Jian, MA Jian. Research on Evaluation Model for Network Information Service Based on Data Driven [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(2): 30-35.
[7] WANG Jing. Research on Copyright Risk Assessment System of Network Information Resource [J]. , 2018, 30(9): 51-55.
[8] QU Zhibin, LIU Xin. Study on Paper Documents Purchasing Scheme in University Library Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model [J]. , 2018, 30(6): 72-77.
[9] YU Le. Research on the Application of "LibQUAL+TM" in Digital Library's Information Service Quality Evaluation [J]. , 2018, 30(2): 176-179.
[10] TONG Jinhong. Research on Information Service Quality Evaluation of University Library Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method [J]. , 2018, 30(2): 172-175.
[11] GAO Wenwen. Books Supplier Selection Research Based on AHP-OVP Model [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2018, 30(12): 33-37.
[12] WANG Binying. Research on the Evaluation and Promotion of University Library's Characteristic Resource Utility Efficiency [J]. , 2018, 30(1): 59-63.
[13] WANG Ping. Research on the Service Quality Evaluation Method and Index System of Digital University Library [J]. , 2017, 29(6): 132-136.
[14] FENG Jiao. Application and Research of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method in Library Management System for Liaoning University of Technology [J]. , 2017, 29(6): 44-46.
[15] GONG Yu-ping. Construction of Information Service Quality Control System in Mobile Library [J]. , 2016, 28(2): 177-180.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!