中文    English

Agricultural Library and Information ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 23-30.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2019.09.19-0346

• Research paper • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the University S&T Development Index Oriented the DoubleFirst-Class Construction

ZHAO Rongying1,2, WANG Jianpin1,2,3, WANG Xu1,2, DAI Yifan1,2   

  1. 1. Research Center for China Science Evaluation, Hubei Wuhan 430072, China;
    2. School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Hubei Wuhan 430072, China;
    3.School of Information Technology, Shangqiu Normal University, Henan Shangqiu 476000, China
  • Received:2019-04-24 Online:2019-10-05 Published:2019-11-14

Abstract: Innovating the concept and improving the level of scientific and technological (S&T) evaluation in universities is a powerful guarantee for the construction of first-class universities and first-class disciplines. This paper designed the Framework of compiling University S&T Development Index which included the main theory points, the principle, the method of constructing the index and the building of the information processing platform. It laid the foundation for the comprehensive implementation of the University S&T Development Index. Compared with the traditional S&T evaluation methods, the University S&T Development Index has the characteristics of dynamic, international standards, objective and feasibility. It meets the new requirements of the S&T evaluation under the background of double first-class construction.

Key words: university S&T;, University S&T Development Index;, S&T evaluation;, double first-class

CLC Number: 

  • G311
[1] 王瑞文,孙建东. 地区高校科技能力评价——基于高校科技统计数据的因子分析[J]. 科学管理研究, 2012(04):61-65.
[2] 沈秋坦,周荣庭. 卓越导向的大学科研评价框架研究[J].研究生教育研究, 2013(05):63-68.
[3] 乔刚,李芬. 监测评估:高等教育评估的新理念[J].高教探索, 2016(11): 16-20.
[4] 范丽丽,吴瑞林.“双一流”背景下高校学位授权点申报和建设质量问题——基于专项评估和动态调整结果数据的分析[J].研究生教育研究,2018(05):70-76.
[5] Boskin M J, Dulberger E R, Gordon R J, et al.Consumer Prices, the Consumer Price Index, and the Cost of Living[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, 12(1):3-26.
[6] 徐国祥. 统计指数理论及应用[M]. 中国统计出版社, 2005.
[7] Anderson E W, Fornell C .Foundations of the American Customer Satisfaction Index[J]. Total Quality Management, 2000, 11(7):S869-S882.
[8] PeNI, aLó, pez. Human Development Index[J]. Chapters, 2006(8707):3012-3013.
[9] Anell B I, Wilson T L.PRESCRIPTS: CREATING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY[J].Competitiveness Review An International Business Journal Incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 2002, 12(1):26-37.
[10] 国家统计局社科文司“中国创新指数研究”课题组. 中国创新指数研究[J]. 统计研究, 2014, 31(11):24-28.
[11] 袁卫, 彭非. 中国发展指数的编制研究[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2007,21(2):1-12.
[12] 张会敏. 基于指数的高等教育质量管理方法研究[D]. 华东师范大学,2012.
[13] 统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设总体方案[EB/OL].[2019-04-24].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/xw_zt/moe_357/jyzt_2015nztzl/2015_zt15/.
[14] 王战军,王永林. 监测评估:高等教育评估发展的新图景[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2014(02):5-9.
[15] 国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要[EB/OL].[2019-04-24].http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/info_list/201407/xxgk_171904.html.
[16] Barron G R S. The Berlin Principles on Ranking Higher Education Institutions: limitations, legitimacy, and value conflict[J]. Higher Education, 2017,73: 1-17.
[17] 关于印发《统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设实施办法(暂行)》的通知[EB/OL].[2019-04-24].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_843/201701/t20170125_295701.html.
[18] 王永静,胡露月.丝绸之路经济带中国西北段城市群综合承载力实证分析[J].华东经济管理,2018,32(11):37-43.
[19] 彭非, 袁卫, 惠争勤. 对综合评价方法中指数功效函数的一种改进探讨[J]. 统计研究, 2007(12):29-34.
[20] 刘容志,黄天蔚,邱志强.产业集群创业孵化系统协调度评价指标构建[J].科研管理,2016,37(S1):578-582.
[21] 王智慧, 刘莉. 国家创新能力评价指标比较分析[J]. 科研管理, 2015(S1):162-168.
[22] 俞立平. 学术期刊经典论文的评价指标——经典指数[J].农业图书情报,2019,31(1):35-43
[23] 薛霏,鲁特·莱兹多夫,叶鹰.学术评价的多变量指标探讨[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(04):63-73.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!