Abstract: Public libraries in South Korea assist users in obtaining information on a variety of topics. However, health-related information and service have a lower profile than other service due to a perceived lack of librarian expertise in searching and evaluating health resource. Although public library users are actively seeking health information, it has become critical for both public librarians and users to develop skills for using and evaluating internet health resource. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify a set of useful criteria to evaluate online health websites for both librarians and library users. From a comprehensive literature review, 33 criteria related to health website evaluation were identified. Using this set of criteria, South Korean public librarians and users were asked to rate the importance of each criterion in surveys. A strong consensus was found between the two groups. The top 10 most highly rated criteria from both groups were identified and compared. The results led to the development of an initial set of 12 evaluation criteria for health websites. It is expected that the final set of criteria will be used by public librarians to recommend the best health websites to their users. Although the study was conducted in South Korean public libraries, the findings were applicable in providing evaluation services of health websites to libraries worldwide.

Key words: Public library