中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 39-52.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.22-0323

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Quantitative Analysis and Enlightenment on Open Science Policy Texts in Scientific Research Institutions from the Perspective of Policy Tools

WANG Yihan1,2, CHU Jingli1,2   

  1. 1.National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2.Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
  • Received:2022-05-07 Online:2022-07-05 Published:2022-09-21

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] At present, there is relatively little research on the open science (OS) policy at the level of scientific research institutions in China, while some preliminary explorations have been made abroad. The text analysis of OS policies of representative scientific research institutions and lessons drawn from their policy making experience can provide a good reference for the formulation of OS policies by Chinese scientific research institutions. It gives play to the main role of scientific research institutions in the OS process, and promotes the practice of OS from bottom to top. [Method/Process] Based on the perspective of policy tools, this paper uses the content analysis method to conduct quantitative analysis on 12 OS policy texts published by international scientific research institutions. It establishes an X-Y two-dimensional analysis framework for OS policy of scientific research institutions. The content analysis categories are as follows: policy instrument dimension (X dimension) - authority, incentive, symbol and exhortation, capacity building, and system change; OS content factor dimension (Y dimension) - open content, open process, open infrastructure, and open cooperation. This paper carries out research through the X-Y two-dimensional analysis framework, aiming to reveal the use of policy tool preferences and policy content focus on the tendency, refining the key factors of research institutions' OS policy, putting forward the policy tool optimization strategy and providing insights into Chinese scientific research institutions in formulating OS policies. [Results/Conclusions] From the dimension of policy tools, capacity building tools are more used, followed by authority tools, and other policy tools are less used. From the dimension of OS content elements, the eight themes of open data, open access, OS education and training, open cooperation, open evaluation, open infrastructure, open incentive and citizen science are the main concerns in the OS policies issued by international research institutions. The use of OS policy tools in scientific research institutions should coordinate with each other, optimize the combination of policy tools; try to solve the actual problems, strengthen the internal balance of policy tools; adjust measures to local conditions and make full use of differences in policy tools. In formulating OS policies, scientific research institutions should further integrate themselves into the international OS tide, understand the development trend, and ensure the forward-looking of policies; adjust and optimize the organizational structure, clarify the division of responsibilities, and promote open scientific practice in an overall way; the core elements and key issues of OS policies should be grasped when formulating policies; and in the process of policy formulation and implementation, they should ensure the investment of funds, as well as timely dynamic adjustment.

Key words: open science (OS), open science policy, scientific research institution, policy tools

CLC Number: 

  • G250
[1] 中国科学报. 杨卫委员: 以开放科学促进我国全球科学影响力[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2022/3/475220.shtm.
China science daily. Committee Yang Wei: Promoting China's global scientific influence by open science[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2022/3/475220.shtm.
[2] 赵昆华, 刘细文, 龙艺璇, 等. 从开放获取到开放科学: 科研资助机构的理念与实践[J]. 中国科学基金, 2021, 35(5): 844-854.
ZHAO K H, LIU X W, LONG Y X, et al.From open access to open science: Notion and practices of national science & technology funding agencies[J]. Bulletin of national natural science foundation of China, 2021, 35(5): 844-854.
[3] 王译晗, 叶钰铭. 近10年国内外开放科学研究述评[J]. 农业图书情学报, 2021, 33(10): 20-35.
WANG Y H, YE Y M.Review on the research of open science at home and abroad in recent ten years[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2021, 33(10): 20-35.
[4] UNESCO. Towards a UNESCO recommendation on open science[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/open_scie-nce_brochure_en.pdf.
[5] KWON S, MOTOHASHI K.Incentive or disincentive for disclosure of research data? A large-scale empirical analysis and implications for open science policy[J]. International journal of information management, 2021(60): 102371.
[6] 盛小平, 武彤. 国内外科学数据开放共享研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(17): 6-14.
SHENG X P, WU T.Review on open sharing of scientific data across the world[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(17): 6-14.
[7] ROBINSON-GARCIA N, COSTAS R, LEEUWEN T.Open access uptake by universities worldwide[J]. PeerJ, 2020, 8(2): E9410.
[8] 范昊, 王贺. 欧洲开放获取政策及其启示——以“开放获取S计划”为例[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2019(9): 37-43, 73.
FAN H, WANG H.Research on European open access policies and its enlightenments - A case of plan S[J]. Research on library science, 2019(9): 37-43, 73.
[9] Openaire. Open science overview in Europe[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://www.openaire.eu/os-eu-countries.
[10] OA新闻资讯监测[EB/OL].[2022-06-01]. http://stm.las.ac.cn/STMonitor/index.htm?serverId=190&period=tenDay#.
OA news and information monitoring[EB/OL]. [2022-06-01]. http://stm.las.ac.cn/STMonitor/index.htm?serverId=190&period=tenDay#.
[11] Nature index[EB/OL]. [2022-03-09].https://www.natureindex.com/annual-tables/2021/institution/all/all.
[12] Utrecht university. Open science[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://www.uu.nl/en/research/open-science.
[13] Tampere universities. Open science[EB/OL].[2022-04-20].https://www.tuni.fi/en/research/responsible-research/open-science#expan-der-trigger--65f39225-8b9e-4265-a05f-26c479856ef1.
[14] CNRS. Science ouverte[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://www.science-ouverte.cnrs.fr/.
[15] Technische universiteit delft. About the-programme[EB/OL].[2022-03-09].https://www.tudelft.nl/library/tu-delft-open-science/about-the-programme.
[16] IZTECH. IZTECH open sciences policy[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://gcris.iyte.edu.tr/handle/11147/51.
[17] Maastricht university. Open science[EB/OL].[2022-04-20]. https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/research/open-science.
[18] Université paul-valéry montpellier III. Charte sciences ouvertes[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://www.univ-montp3.fr/fr/unit%C3%A9s-de-recherche/charte-sciences-ouvertes.
[19] NTNU. Policy for open science at NTNU[EB/OL].[2022-04-20]. https://www.ntnu.edu/policy-for-open-science.
[20] Australian academy of science. Position statement-open science[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://www.science.org.au/supporting-science/science-policy-and-analysis/position-statements/position-statement-open-science.
[21] NASA. Open-source science initiative[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://science.nasa.gov/open-science-overview.
[22] University of Zurich. Open science[EB/OL].[2022-04-20]. https://www.uzh.ch/cmsssl/en/about/basics/openscience.html.
[23] Library services. UCL office for open science and scholarship[EB/OL].[2022-04-20]. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/library/open-science-research-support/ucl-office-open-science-and-scholarship.
[24] 刘彬芳, 魏玮, 安小米. 大数据时代政府数据治理的政策分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2019, 38(1): 142-147, 141.
LIU B F, WEI W, AN X M.Analysis of government data governance policy in the era of big data[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2019, 38(1): 142-147, 141.
[25] 黄萃. 政策文献量化研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 80-81.
HUANG C.Quantitative research of policy literature[M]. Beijing: Science press, 2016: 80-81.
[26] FLANAGAN K, UYARRA E, LARANJA M.Reconceptualising the policy mix of innovation[J]. Research policy, 2011, 40(5): 702-713.
[27] ROTHWELL R, ZEGVELD W.Reindustrialization and technology[M]. London: Longman, 1985.
[28] MCDONNELL L M, ELMORE R F.Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments[J]. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 1987, 9(2): 133-152.
[29] SCHNEIDER A, INGRAM H.Behavioral assumptions of policy tools[J]. The journal of politics, 1990, 52(2): 510-529.
[30] OECD. Open and inclusive collaboration in science[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/open-and-inclusive-collaboration-in-science_2dbff737-en.
[31] Ocsdnet. ANEXO declaración de panamá sobre ciencia abierta[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://gitlab.com/declaraciondepanama/declaracion-de-panama/-/blob/master/DeclaraciondePanama_ANEXO_Detalle.md.
[32] EILEEN G H.Chapter 7-Open science[EB/OL]. [2022-03-09].https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081021248000076#bb0100.
[33] Foster. Open science taxonomy[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/themes/fosterstrap/images/taxonomies/os_taxonomy.png.
[34] CORRALL S.The open movement: What libraries can do[C]//Charleston library conference, 2016.
[35] MUNRO C, COUCH P, JOHNSON J, et al.Towards an open infrastruc-ture for relating scholarly assets[J]. Studies in health technology & informatics, 2017, 235(235): 491.
[36] 赵展一, 黄金霞. 开放科学基础设施的信息资源建设模式分析[J]. 图书馆建设, 2021(3): 46-55.
ZHAO Z Y, HUANG J X.Analysis of information resource construc-tion mode of open science infrastructures[J]. Library development, 2021(3): 46-55.
[37] European commission. Open science[EB/OL].[2022-05-07]. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/research_and_innovation/knowledge_publications_tools_and_data/documents/ec_rtd_factsheet-open-science_2019.pdf.
[38] European commission. Perspectives on the future of open science[EB/OL].[2022-03-09]. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/74cfe2bc-200c-11ec-bd8e-01aa75ed71a1.
[39] 于正伟, 胡曼云. 政策、政策供求与政策均衡——公共政策研究的供求分析框架[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 12(1): 240-242.
YU Z W, HU M Y.Policy, policy supply and demand and policy equilibrium - The framework of supply and demand analysis in public policy research[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia agricultural university(social science edition), 2010, 12(1): 240-242.
[40] 陈兰杰, 赵元晨. 政策工具视角下我国开放政府数据政策文本分析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2020, 41(6): 46-53.
CHEN L J, ZHAO Y C.Analysis of open government data policy text in China from the perspective of policy tools[J]. Information and documentation services, 2020, 41(6): 46-53.
[41] Sparc Europe.An analysis of open science policies in Europe[EB/OL].[2022-03-09].https://www.ouvrirlascience.fr/an-analysis-of-open-science-policies-in-europe-v4-august-2019-2/.
[42] Open science policy platform. Final report: Progress on open science: Towards a shared research knowledge system[EB/OL].[2022-03-09].https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/expert-groups/consult?do=groupDetail.groupDetail&groupID=3436&NewSearch=1&NewSearch=1.
[43] Sparc Europe.Scoping the open science infrastructure landscape in Europe[EB/OL]. [2022-03-09].https://sparceurope.org/new-sparc-europe-report-out-scoping-the-open-science-infrastructure-landscape-in-europe/.
[44] LERU. Open science and its role in universities: A roadmap for cultural change[EB/OL].[2022-06-05]. https://www.leru.org/publications/open-science-and-its-role-in-universities-a-roadmap-for-cultural-change.
[45] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国科学技术进步法(2021年修订)[EB/OL].[2022-06-06]. http://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/fgzc/flfg/202201/t20220118_179043.html.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!