中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 40-53.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0390

;

• Bibliometrics • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the Impact of Regional Innovation Cooperation Network on Technological Innovation Performance: Based on the Yangtze River Delta

GUAN Peng1,2, WANG Yuefen2, HUANG Qin1, YE Longsheng1, FU Zhu3   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Law, Chaohu University, Hefei 238000;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094;
    3. School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science & Technology, Zhenjiang 212003;
  • Received:2021-04-23 Online:2021-06-05 Published:2021-06-15

PDF (PC)

204

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Based on the moderating effect of regional innovation cooperation network's clustering coefficient and average shortest path length, the paper analyzes the impact of enterprise centrality in network on technological innovation performance, in order to provide reference to enterprise innovation management. [Method/Process] Using patent data to construct patent cooperation networks, this paper builds a theoretical model measuring technological innovation performance of an enterprise, with degree centrality and betweenness centrality of the enterprise in the network as independent variables, with the clustering coefficient and average shortest path length of patent cooperation network as a moderator variable. [Results/Conclusions] The empirical study in the field of integrated circuit technology in the Yangtze River Delta is carried out and the stepwise multiple linear regression results show the following conclusions. The density of cooperation network, the accumulation of technological innovation, the number of R&D personnel, and the intensity of R&D investment in the province where the firm is located have a significant positive impact on the firm's technological innovation performance. Compared with enterprises and research institutes, when enterprises cooperate with universities, their technological innovation performance is more favorable. The degree centrality and the betweenness centrality of a firm in the cooperation network have a significant positive impact on the firm's technological innovation performance. The average shortest path length has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between intermediary centrality and firms' technological innovation performance. The longer the average shortest path length is, the more obvious the positive effect of intermediary centrality on firms' technological innovation performance is. Through the empirical analysis, the paper reveals the influence mechanism of regional innovation cooperation network on firms' technological innovation performance. The position (center, intermediary) of firms in the cooperation network has a significant influence on firms' technological innovation performance, and the structural attribute of the cooperation network has a significant moderating effect on this effect. Based on the analysis results, countermeasures and suggestions are put forward to improve the technological innovation performance of enterprises.

Key words: regional innovation cooperation network, patent, technological innovation performance, integrated circuit, the Yangtze River Delta

CLC Number: 

  • C93
[1] SZUCS F2018. Research subsidies, industry-university cooperation and innovation[J]. Research policy, 47(7): 1256-1266.
[2] 张振刚, 李云健, 袁斯帆, 等. 企业家社会资本、产学研合作与专利产出: 合作创新意愿的调节作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(7): 54-64.
ZHANG Z G, LI Y J, YUAN S F, et al.Study on the relationship between entrepreneurial social capital, industry-university-research cooperation and patent output: the moderating role of intention to cooperative innovation[J]. Science of science and management of S & T, 2016, 37(7): 54-64.
[3] 谢伟伟, 邓宏兵, 苏攀达. 长江中游城市群知识创新合作网络研究-高水平科研合著论文实证分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(16): 44-50.
XIE W W, DENG H B, SU P D.Research on knowledge innovation cooperation network in the middle reaches of the Yangtze river-evidence from high-level scientific research co-author papers[J]. Science & technology process and policy, 2019, 36(16): 44-50.
[4] 陈暮紫, 秦玉莹, 李楠. 跨区域知识流动和创新合作网络动态演化分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(12): 2252-2264.
CHEN M Z, QIN Y Y, LI N.Dynamic evolution analysis of cross-regional knowledge flow and innovation cooperation network[J].Studies in science of science, 2019, 37(12): 2252-2264.
[5] 宋潇. 成渝双城经济圈区域合作创新特征与网络结构演化[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(4): 61-67.
SONG X.Characteristics of regional cooperation innovation and evolution of network structure in Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle[J]. Soft science, 2021, 35(4): 61-67.
[6] JAFFE A, TRAJTENBERG M, FOGARTY M.Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors[J]. American economic review, 2000, 90(2): 215-218.
[7] 李万, 周小玲, 胡曙虹, 等. 世界级科技创新城市群: 长三角一体化与上海科创中心的共同抉择[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2018, 3(4): 94-100.
LI W, ZHOU X L, HU S H, et al.World-class urban agglomeration of science and technology: Common choice of the Yangtze river delta integration and shanghai science and technology center[J]. Think tank theory and practice, 2018, 3(4): 94-100.
[8] OZMAN M.Inter-firm networks and innovation: a survey of literature[J]. Economic of innovation and new technology, 2009, 18(1): 39-67.
[9] GRANOVETTER M.The strength of weak ties[J]. American journal of sociology, 1973, 78(6): 1360.
[10] CANTNER U, GRAF H.The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis[J]. Research policy, 2006, 35(4): 463-480.
[11] LI D, WEI Y D, WANG T.Spatial and temporal evolution of urban innovation network in China[J]. Habitat international, 2015, 49: 484-496.
[12] 谢其军. 技术创新合作网络对滞后区域创新绩效的影响研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2018.
XIE Q J.Research on influence of technological cooperation net-work on the innovation performance of lagging-behind regions[D]. Hefei: University of science and technology of China, 2018.
[13] SCHILLING M A, PHELPS C C.Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation[J]. Management science, 2007, 53(7): 1113-1126.
[14] TAKAGI S, TOYAMA R.On growth of network and centrality's change analysis of co-inventors network in enterprise[C]. World summit on knowledge society, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008: 422-427.
[15] NERKAR A, PARUCHURI S.Evolution of R & D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm[J]. Management science, 2005, 51(5): 771-785.
[16] 迟嘉昱, 孙翎, 杨晓华. 网络结构、地理接近性对企业专利合作的影响机制研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(16): 144-149.
CHI J Y, SUN L, YANG X H.An study on the influencing mecha-nism of network structure, geographic proximity on firms' patent cooperation[J]. Science and technology management research, 2018, 38(16): 144-149.
[17] FLEMING L, MINGO S, CHEN D.Collaborative brokerage, genera-tive creativity, and creative success[J]. Adminis-trative science quarterly, 2007, 52(3): 443-475.
[18] 唐建荣, 李晨瑞, 倪攀. 长三角城市群创新网络结构及其驱动因素研究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2018(11): 63-76.
TANG J R, LI C R, NI P.Research on innovation network structure and driving factors of the Yangtze river delta urban agglomeration[J]. Shanghai economic research, 2018(11): 63-76.
[19] 王海花, 孙芹, 杜梅, 等. 长三角城市群协同创新网络演化及形成机制研究-依存型多层网络视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(9): 69-78.
WANG H H, SUN Q, DU M, et al.Research on the evolution trend and mechanism of collaborative innovation network in the Yangtze river delta-The perspective of interdependent network[J]. Science & technology process and policy, 2020, 37(9): 69-78.
[20] 殷德生, 吴虹仪, 金桩. 创新网络、知识溢出与高质量一体化发展-来自长江三角洲城市群的证据[J]. 上海经济研究, 2019(11): 30-45.
YIN D S, WU H Y, JIN Z.Innovation networks, knowledge spillover and high-quality integrated development: An empirical study based on the urban agglomeration of the Yangtze river delta[J]. Shanghai economic research, 2019(11): 30-45.
[21] 解学梅, 左蕾蕾. 企业协同创新网络特征与创新绩效: 基于知识吸收能力的中介效应研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2013, 16(3): 47-56.
XIE X M, ZUO L L.Characteristics of collaborative innovation networks and innovation performance of firms: The mediating effect of knowledge absorptive capacity[J]. Nankai management review, 2013, 16(3): 47-56.
[22] 胡艳, 潘婷, 张桅. 一体化国家战略下长三角城市群协同创新的经济增长效应研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 51(5): 99-106, 239.
HU Y, PAN T, ZHANG W.On the economic growth effect of the coordinated innovation of the Yangtze river delta urban agglomera-tion under the integrated national strategy[J]. Journal of east China normal university(humanities and social sciences), 2019, 51(5): 99-106, 239.
[23] 王文霄. 从集成电路领域中国专利状况看“中国芯”的发展前景[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2015(7): 29-34.
WANG W X.Viewing the development prospect of "China chip" from the status of Chinese patents in the field of integrated circuits[J]. Inventions and patents in China, 2015(7): 29-34.
[24] GUAN J, ZUO K, CHEN K, et al.Does country-level R & D efficiency benefit from the collaboration network structure?[J].Research policy, 2016, 45(4): 770-784.
[25] BURT R S.The network structure of social capital[J]. Research in organizational behavior, 2000, 22(22): 345-423.
[26] 吴江. 社会网络的动态分析与仿真实验-理论与应用[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2012: 43-52.
WU J.Dynamic analysis and simulation of social networks-theory and applications[M]. Wuhan: Wuhan university press, 2012: 43-52.
[27] YAMAGUCHI K.The flow of information through social networks: Diagonal-free measures of inefficiency and the structural determinants of inefficiency[J]. Social networks, 1994, 16(1): 57-86.
[28] 吴慧, 顾晓敏. 产学研合作创新绩效的社会网络分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(10): 1578-1586.
WU H, GU X M.Social network analysis of innovation performance of industry-university-research cooperation[J]. Studies in science of science, 2017, 35(10): 1578-1586.
[29] TONG X, FRAME J D.Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data[J]. Research policy, 1994, 23: 133-141.
[30] BEAUDRY C, SCHIFFAUEROVA A.Impacts of collaboration and network indicators on patent quality: The case of Canadian nanotechnology innovation[J]. European management journal, 2011, 29(5): 362-376.
[31] ZEEBROECK N V, POTTERIE B V.Filing strategies and patent value[J]. Economics of innovation & new technology, 2011, 20(6821): 539-561.
[32] BLUNDELL R, GRIFFITH R, VAN REENEN J, et al.Dynamic count data models of technological innovation[J]. The economic journal, 1994, 105(429): 333-344.
[33] 何晓群. 应用回归分析[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2017: 156-158.
HE X Q.Applied regression analysis[M]. Beijing: Electronic industry press, 2017: 156-158.
[34] CHEN Y, JAW Y.How do business groups' small world networks effect diversification, innovation, and internationalization?[J]. Asia pacific journal of management, 2014, 31(4): 1019-1044.
[1] XIA Dong, XU Yingqi, WANG Chao, REN Bo. Challenges and Countermeasures of Targeted Scientific and Technical Novelty Search [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 88-97.
[2] MENG Jing, TANG Yan. Analysis and Research Progress of Global Patent Technology of Wheat Genetics and Breeding [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(6): 93-103.
[3] LIAO Siqin, ZHOU Yu. The Current Situation and Analysis of Patent Information Service of University Libraries in China: Taking the IPR Information Service Centers of 23 Universities as an Example [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(2): 63-74.
[4] CHENG Xingru, KANG Yuli, MENG Ziyun, LI Nan, TANG Qiaoling, WANG Youhua. Progress Analysis and Prospects of Bt Gene Research and Development Based on Global Patents [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(11): 81-91.
[5] XU Yi, LI Jing, XU Haiyun, LI Shuying. Identification of Technology Transfer Potential Based on Patent Dynamic Characteristics [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(6): 107-115.
[6] ZENG Jinjing, LIU Tian, ZHANG Rui. Patent Information Service Strategies of Academic Libraries Oriented to Patent Supply Chain [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(5): 40-50.
[7] LI Lei, SONG JianNing, SONG TianHua. Technology Forecasting Based on Topic Identification of Online Innovation Communities and S-Curve [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(4): 45-57.
[8] WU Qingyuan, ZHAO Sidi. Comparative Research of Patent Citations of Patent Applicants and Patent Examiners:A Case Study in the Field of 5G Communication Technologies [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(3): 16-27.
[9] LI Xin. Benchmarking Research on Patent Technology of RV Reducer of Robot in China and Japan from the Perspective of Chinese Patent Intelligence [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(2): 5-11.
[10] FAN Jiujiang, LI Rui. An Analysis of Technological Competition and Cooperation between China and Singapore from the Perspective of Patents [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(2): 12-23.
[11] XIANG Shuxuan, LI Rui. Comparative Analysis of Registered Patents between Malaysia and China [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(2): 24-34.
[12] TANG Han, LI Rui. Discovery of Innovation Cooperation Opportunities between China and India Based on the Analysis of Patent Citations of Category A [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(2): 35-43.
[13] ZHANG Handong, LI Rui. Analysis of Patent Competition and Cooperation between China and Poland [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(2): 44-53.
[14] FENG Shaohua, ZAN Dong, SU Ju, ZHANG Zhan. Characteristics of Global "Marine Aquatic Feed" Domain Development Based on Patent Analysis [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(12): 71-82.
[15] SUN Yiwei, REN Ni, GUO Ting, DAI Hongjun. Research Status of the Key Technology of Livestock and Poultry Farming Facilities [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(10): 87-97.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Editorial Board of Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture
Tel：(010)82109667　Fax：(010)82109667　E-mail：xuekan＠caas.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.
知识共享许可协议