中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 65-78.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.22-0395

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Is the Privacy Waybill Really Invisible? A Study of Courier Industry's Personal Information Protection

CUI Yilin, LI Zhuozhuo*   

  1. Society School of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123
  • Received:2022-05-26 Online:2022-08-05 Published:2022-10-26

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] The modern courier industry is developing rapidly and the demand for courier services is increasing. A large amount of personal information is involved in parcel waybills, and even if privacy waybills are used, there is still a risk of personal information exposure. This study attempts to examine whether invisible face slips in the courier industry can effectively protect users' personal information in accordance with the Personal Information Protection Law implemented in November 2021 in China, and to propose feasible suggestions for the protection of personal information within the courier industry. [Method/Process] This study selected 9 major courier companies in China as the research object, and investigated and compared the courier agreement terms and privacy waybills by collecting each courier company. By comparing the terms of express agreement of each courier company, we investigated the perception and definition of personal sensitive information of the 9 major courier companies, and studied the general understanding and difference between personal information and personal sensitive information within the courier industry. By further comparing the invisible face sheet standards of each courier company and within the courier companies, we investigated the differences in the anonymization of parcel waybills and studied the implementation of invisible face sheet standards and differences in the courier industry. After completing the above investigation, the effectiveness of the courier industry in terms of personal information protection was compared by designing a personal information protection index and analyzing the variability among courier companies and within courier companies. [Results/Conclusions] The study found that there is no unified standard in the implementation of privacy waybills in China's courier industry, and the perception of sensitive personal information has not been unified, resulting in the phenomenon of different standards of privacy waybills among courier companies. The phenomenon of different invisible face sheet standards exists not only among courier companies, but also within courier companies. The specific problems are revealed by the different regionalization of invisible face sheet standards within courier companies, and this study classifies the degree of personal information protection into 3 levels, namely excellent, good and dangerous, with the excellent region of East China. In response to the phenomenon of different invisible face sheet standards in the courier industry, China needs to develop a special courier industry standard to reduce the problem of exposing users' personal information and form an information association with the different invisible face sheet standards implemented in parcel waybills. The study also found that the degree of impact and sensitivity of personal information varies in the use scenarios of different industries, and the Personal Information Protection Law has a broad definition of personal sensitive information, which requires the development of special definition standards depending on the circumstances of each industry to further strengthen the protection of personal information in China. This paper puts forward 3 feasible suggestions to address the above issues: first, to clarify the personal sensitive information involved in privacy waybills; second, to build a unified privacy waybill standard within the express industry; and third, to strengthen the implementation of promoting the unified standard.

Key words: personal information protection, anonymization, express information, privacy waybill

CLC Number: 

  • D92
[1] 韩大鹏. 派件费每单涨0.1元“涨薪留人”能否改变快递网点窘境?[EB/OL]. [2021-12-22]. https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-09-07/doc-iktzqtyt4489471.shtml.
HAN D P.Delivery fee of courier industry per single up 0.1 yuan "salary increase to retain people" can change the courier network dilemma?[EB/OL].[2021-12-22].https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-09-07/doc-iktzqtyt4489471.shtml.
[2] 宁园. 敏感个人信息的法律基准与范畴界定——以《个人信息保护法》第28条第1款为中心[J]. 比较法研究, 2021(5): 33-49.
NING Y.The legal attributes and definition of sensitive personal information: Centered on the first paragraph of article 28 of personal information protection law of PRC[J]. Journal of comparative law, 2021(5): 33-49.
[3] 李永军. 论《民法总则》中个人隐私与信息的"二元制"保护及请求权基础[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2017(3): 10-21.
LI Y J.The research on the "dual system" protection and claim basis of the personal privacy and information in the general principles of civil law[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang university, 2017(3): 10-21
[4] 汤敏. 个人敏感信息保护的欧美经验及其启示[J]. 图书馆建设2018(2): 41-47.
TANG M.European and American experience of personal sensitive information protection and its enlightening[J]. Library development, 2018(2): 41-47.
[5] 齐爱民. 电子病历与患者个人医疗信息的法律保护[J]. 社会科学家, 2007(5): 10-13.
QI A M.The legal protection of electronic medical records and petient's personal medical information[J]. Social scientist, 2007(5): 10-13.
[6] 李丹丹. 论个人医疗信息的法律保护[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 36(2): 87-93.
LI D D.On the legal protection of personal medical information[J]. Journal of Jishou university, 2015, 36(2): 87-93.
[7] 胡文涛. 我国个人敏感信息界定之构想[J]. 中国法学, 2018(5): 235-254.
HU W T.The concept of defining sensitive personal information in China[J]. China legal science, 2018(5): 235-254.
[8] 邱均平, 邹菲. 关于内容分析法的研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2004(2): 12-17.
QIU J P, ZOU F.A study of content anaysis method[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2004(2): 12-17.
[9] PULJAK L, MLADINI A, IPHOFEN R, et al.Before and after enforcement of GDPR: Personal data protection requests received by Croatian personal data protection agency from academic and research institutions[J]. Biochemia medica, 30(3): 13-21.
[10] 刘权. 论个人信息处理的合法、正当、必要原则[J]. 法学家, 2021(5): 1-15.
LIU Q.On the principle of legality, legitimacy and necessity of personal information processing[J]. The jurist, 2021(5): 1-15.
[11] 梅绍祖. 个人信息保护的基础性问题研究[J]. 苏州大学学报, 2005(2): 25-30.
MEI S Z.Research on the fundamental issues of personal information protection[J]. Journal of Soochow university, 2005(2): 25-30.
[12] 高富平. 个人信息保护: 从个人控制到社会控制[J]. 法学研究, 2018, 40(3): 84-101.
GAO F P.Protection of personal information: From individual control to social control[J]. Chinese journal of law, 2018, 40(3): 84-101.
[13] DOMINGO-FERRER J, TORRA V.Statistical data protection in statistical microdata protection via advanced record linkage[J]. Statistics and computing, 2003, 13(4): 343-354.
[14] AMIRI A.Dare to share: Protecting sensitive knowledge with data sanitization[J]. Decision support systems, 2007, 43(1): 181-191.
[15] 李媛. 大数据时代个人信息保护研究[D]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2016.
LI Y.Protecting information privacy in the era of big data[D]. Chongqing: Southewest university of political science and law, 2016.
[16] 周水庚, 李丰, 陶宇飞, 等. 面向数据库应用的隐私保护研究综述[J]. 计算机学报, 2009, 32(5): 847-861.
ZHOU Y G, LI F, TAO Y F, et al.Privacy preservation in database applications: A survy[J]. Chinese journal of computers, 2009, 32(5): 847-861.
[17] GUJJARY V A, SAXENA A.A neural network approach for data masking[J]. Neurocomputing, 2011, 74(9): 1497-1501.
[18] JAMES S, MARCELLO I, SOTIRIA K, et al.Data protection and ethics requirements for multisite research with health data: A comparative examination of legislative governance frameworks and the role of data protection technologies[J]. Journal of law and the biosciences, 2020(1): 1.
[19] 程啸. 论大数据时代的个人数据权利[J]. 中国社会科学, 2018, 267(3): 102-122, 207, 208.
CHENG X. On the right to personal data in the era of big data[J]. Social science in China, 2018, 267(3): 102-122, 207, 208.
[20] KRISHNAMURTY M, RATHINDRA S.Data shuffling - A New masking approach for numeric data[J]. Journal of management science, 2006, 52(5): 658-670.
[21] 王利明. 论个人信息权的法律保护——以个人信息权与隐私权的界分为中心[J]. 现代法学, 2013, 35(4): 62-72.
WANG L M.Legal protection of personal information: Contered on the line between personal information and privacy[J]. Modern law science, 2013, 35(4): 62-72.
[22] REARDON M. Securing data from the threat within[N]. ZDNet news, 2005-01-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!