面向需求的应用本体不一致诊断筛选方法研究

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2016.02.002

›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 9-10.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2016.02.002

• Information forum • Previous Articles Next Articles

Research on the Requirement-oriented Diagnosis and Filtering Method for Inconsistent Application Ontology

SONG Dan-hui

Library, Henan University of Science and Technology, Henan Luoyang 471023, China

Received:2015-10-22 Online:2016-02-05 Published:2016-02-26

Abstract

Abstract: Considering the problems of existing ontology diagnosis methods on returning too many minimal diagnosis and placing too much burden on users, and combining with application ontology and its requirement characteristics, the article explored new research ideas and methods to combine and optimize the core algorithms of axiom credibility and information entropy filtering and diagnosis methods applied in different diagnostic tools respectively. Then it put forward a comprehensive heuristic filtering and diagnosis method and expounded its basic idea and operation steps, and used typical experimental ontology to validate the effectiveness of this method.

Key words: Application ontology

CLC Number:

G254.29

SONG Dan-hui. Research on the Requirement-oriented Diagnosis and Filtering Method for Inconsistent Application Ontology[J]., 2016, 28(2): 9-10.

References

[1] Schlobach S,Cornet R. Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies[C].//Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2003),2003:355-360.
[2] Schlobach S,Huang Z. Inconsistent ontology diagnosis: Framework and prototype[J]. Deliverable D3.6.1, SEKT.2005:15-25.
[3] Horridge M.Justification based explanation in ontologies[D]. the University of Manchester, 2011.
[4] Hunter A,Konieczny S.Measuring inconsistency through minimal inconsistent sets[C].//Proceedings of the KR,2008,(8):358-366.
[5] Deng X, Haarslev V, Shiri N. Measuring inconsistencies in ontologies[M].The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2007.
[6] Kalyanpur A.Debugging and repair of owl ontologies[D].University of Maryland,Department of Computer Science,College Park,2006.
[7] Kalyanpur A,Parsia B,Sirin E,et al.Swoop:A web ontology editing browser[J].Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web,2006,4(2):144-153.Springer,Heidelberg,2005:745-757.
[8] Lam S C J. Methods for resolving inconsistencies in ontologies[D]. University of Aberdeen,2007.
[9] Lam J, Pan J Z,Sleeman D,et al.Ontology inconsistency handling: ranking and rewriting axioms[R]. Technical report AUCS/TR0603, University of Aberdeen,2006.
[10] Ma Y,Hitzler P.Distance-based measures of inconsistency and incoherency for description logics[C].//Proceedings of the 23rd International Workshop on Description Logics DL,2010:467-470.
[11] Shchekotykhin K, Friedrich G. Query strategy for sequential ontology debugging[M].The Semantic Web-ISWC 2010. Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2010.
[12] Shchekotykhin K., Friedrich G., Fleiss P., et al.Interactive ontology debugging: two query strategies for efficient fault localization[J].Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web,2012(12-13):88-103.
[13] Shchekotykhin K, Friedrich G. Diagnosis discrimination for ontology debugging[C].//Proceedings of 19 th EuropeanConferenceon ArtificialIntelligence,2010:33.
[14] Rodler P, Shchekotykhin K, Fleiss P, et al. RIO: Minimizing User Interaction in Ontology Debugging[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1209.3734, 2012.