农业图书情报学报

• •    

协同理论视角下中国“双一流”高校图书馆AI素养教育实践路径研究

祝璐颖1, 李晓妍2(), 陈稳3,4, 杜杏叶5,6   

  1. 1. 中国海洋大学 图书馆,青岛 266100
    2. 南京林业大学 人文社会科学学院,南京 210037
    3. 南京大学 数据智能与交叉创新实验室,南京 210023
    4. 南京大学 数据管理创新研究中心,苏州 215163
    5. 中国科学院文献情报中心,北京 100190
    6. 中国科学院大学 经济与管理学院信息资源管理系,北京 100190
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-15 出版日期:2026-04-03
  • 通讯作者: 李晓妍
  • 作者简介:

    祝璐颖(1997- ),女,硕士,助理馆员,研究方向为情报分析与学科服务

    陈稳(1997- ),女,博士研究生,研究方向为科技创新、技术预测

    杜杏叶(1973- ),女,博士,研究馆员,研究方向为数字学术服务、学术论文评价、开放同行评议、科技期刊发展战略

  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目“智能体赋能下的科技情报服务流程重构与场景应用研究”(25CTQ047)

Practice Pathway of AI Literacy Education in Libraries of "Double First-Class" Universities in China from the Perspective of Synergistic Theory

ZHU Luying1, LI Xiaoyan2(), CHEN Wen3,4, DU Xingye5,6   

  1. 1. Library of Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100
    2. Faculty of humanities & social sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037
    3. Laboratory of Data Intelligence and Interdisciplinary Innovation, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
    4. Research Institute for Data Management Innovation, Nanjing University, Suzhou 215163
    5. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
    6. Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
  • Received:2026-01-15 Online:2026-04-03
  • Contact: LI Xiaoyan

摘要:

[目的/意义] 探索中国高校图书馆AI素养教育协同发展路径,助力高校更好地培育符合AI时代发展需要的高素质人才。 [方法/过程] 从协同理论视角切入高校图书馆AI素养教育研究,通过网络调研中国42所“双一流”高校图书馆AI素养教育开展情况,从教育主体、教育对象、教育形式、教育内容出发,构建协同理论视角下中国高校图书馆AI素养教育协同框架。 [结果/结论] 结果显示,国内高校图书馆AI素养教育表现出主体建立合作关系、对象强调群体互学、形式重视平台互补、内容侧重知识技能的现状特点。结合协同框架与调研结果,从主体网络层、对象互助层、形式优化层、内容赋能层4个方面构建中国“双一流”高校图书馆AI素养教育协同发展路径,推动AI素养教育从分散走向系统、从单一走向融合、从浅层走向深化。

关键词: 协同理论, AI素养教育, “双一流”高校图书馆

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has brought both opportunities and challenges, redefining users' knowledge and capabilities. It is necessary to re-examine and build new capabilities suitable for the era of AI-AI literacy. As the main institution of information literacy education in higher education, university libraries have inherent advantages in carrying out AI literacy education. The research aims to explore the development path of AI literacy education in university libraries and assist them in better cultivating high-quality talent that meetS the needs of the AI era. [Method/Process] The practice of AI literacy education in university libraries is influenced by multiple interwoven factors and is essentially a complex, open and dynamic system. Therefore, introducing collaborative theory into this practical field provides guidance for the collaborative development of AI literacy education in university libraries in China. Through online research on the implementation of AI literacy education in libraries of 42 "Double First-Class" universities in China, a collaborative framework for AI literacy education in university libraries in China from the perspective of collaborative theory was constructed, starting from the educational subjects, educational objects, educational forms and educational contents, and the current collaborative status of each element was analyzed. [Results/Conclusions] The results show that the AI literacy education in domestic university libraries is characterized by the establishment of cooperative relationships by the main body, the emphasis on group mutual learning for the objects, the importance placed on platform complementarity in the form, and the focus on knowledge and skills in the content. Based on the collaborative framework and the research results, the following development paths are proposed: The first is the main body network layer, which requires the establishment of a diversified multi-party collaborative network, the creation of a specialized and composite team, and the improvement of a long-term collaborative management mechanism. The second is the object mutual assistance layer, which should be based on the two-way empowerment role positioning and the establishment of a two-way interactive education platform. The third is the form optimization layer, which should integrate online and offline educational carriers and design a classified and stratified curriculum system. The fourth is the content empowerment layer, which should develop a local framework for AI literacy theory, balance popularizing knowledge and deepening skills, and strengthen thinking cultivation and ethics education. Thus, AI literacy education will evolve from a scattered approach to a systematic one. It will shift from a single-subject focus to an integrated one, and from superficial to profound.

Key words: synergy theory, AI literacy education, libraries of "Double First-Class" universities

中图分类号:  G258.6

引用本文

祝璐颖, 李晓妍, 陈稳, 杜杏叶. 协同理论视角下中国“双一流”高校图书馆AI素养教育实践路径研究[J/OL]. 农业图书情报学报. https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.26-0024.

ZHU Luying, LI Xiaoyan, CHEN Wen, DU Xingye. Practice Pathway of AI Literacy Education in Libraries of "Double First-Class" Universities in China from the Perspective of Synergistic Theory[J/OL]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture. https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.26-0024.