破“四唯”和“唯SCI”政策的学者评论分析

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.20-0961

Abstract

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] The publication of policy documents of breaking through the evaluation criteria based on" only thesis, only professional title, only academic degree, only awards" and "only SCI " has triggered extensive discussions among academic researchers. Scholars' discussions are logical and thorough, which can be used as a reference for the further improvement of talent evaluation and institutional evaluation policies. [Methods/Process] This paper comprehensively adopted the literature research method, analyzed scholars' views and comments on policy documents, classified scholars' concerns, and proposed suggestions based on the current status of scientific research evaluation. [Results/Conclusions] The paper proposed to improve the classification and evaluation methods, promote the implementation of the representative work system, optimize the allocation of scientific research resources, strengthen the cultivation of domestic journals, establish a comprehensive evaluation system, and strengthen academic ethics supervision, in order to provide references for government decision-making.

Key words: breaking the Four Only, breaking the Only SCI, opinion analysis, policy recommendation, scientific evaluation

CLC Number:

G256

LIU Qian, ZHENG Sijia, GUI Chenjun, WANG Xuefeng. Analysis of Scholars' Comments on Breaking Through the Evaluation Criteria Based on"Four Only"[J].Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(10): 46-58.

References

[1] 新华网. 向着建设世界科技强国的伟大目标奋勇前进！——习近平总书记在两院院士大会上的重要讲话引起热烈反响之一[EB/OL]. [2018-05-28]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/2018-05/28/c_1122901728.htm.
Xinhuanet. March forward to the great goal of building a world science and technology power! General secretary Xi Jinping's important speech at the meeting of the academicians of the two academies aroused enthusiastic repercussions[EB/OL]. [2018-05-28]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/2018-05/28/c_1122901728.htm.
[2] 新华社. 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于深化项目评审、人才评价、机构评估改革的意见》[EB/OL]. [2018-07-03]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htm.
Xinhua news agency. General office of the CPC central committee and general office of the state council issued opinions on deepening the reform of project evaluation, talent evaluation and institutional evaluation[EB/OL]. [2018-07-03]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htm.
[3] 国务院. 国务院关于优化科研管理提升科研绩效若干措施的通知[EB/OL]. [2018-07-24]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-07/24/content_5308787.htm.
The state council. Notice of the state council on measures to optimize scientific research management and improve scientific research performance[EB/OL]. [2018-07-24]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-07/24/content_5308787.htm.
[4] 科技部. 科技部教育部人力资源社会保障部中科院工程院关于开展清理“唯论文、唯职称、唯学历、唯奖项”专项行动的通知[EB/OL].[2018-10-23]. http://www.most.gov.cn/tztg/201810/t20181023_142389.htm.
Ministry of science and technology. Notice of the ministry of science and technology, the ministry of education, the ministry of human resources and social security, the Chinese academy of sciences and the Chinese academy of engineering on carrying out the special action of "only papers, only titles, only academic qualifications, only awards"[EB/OL]. [2018-10-23]. http://www.most.gov.cn/tztg/201810/t20181023_142389.htm.
[5] 教育部, 科技部. 教育部科技部印发《关于规范高等学校 SCI论文相关指标使用树立正确评价导向的若干意见》的通知[EB/OL]. [2020-02-20]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/moe_784/202002/t20200223_423334.html.
Ministry of education, ministry of science and technology. Notice of the ministry of education and the ministry of science and technology on printing and distributing several opinions on standardizing the use of relevant indicators of SCI papers in colleges and universities and establishing correct evaluation guidance[EB/OL]. [2020-02-20]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/moe_784/202002/t20200223_423334.html.
[6] 刘强. 坚决破除“四唯”错误倾向, 尊重学术人才成长规律, 促进学术多元创新发展[EB/OL]. [2018-11-02].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/GckWpMSqDTX3eWoZbjzuPA.
LIU Q.We should resolutely get rid of the "four only" wrong tendency, respect the growth law of academic talents, and promote the development of academic diversity and innovation[EB/OL]. [2018-11-02].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/GckWpMSqDTX3eWoZbjzuPA.
[7] 杨思洛. 破“SCI至上”, 立“合理评价体系”[EB/OL]. [2020-03-17].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/J1mmWanTFux8sLRoTHFZFg.
YANG S L.Breaking "SCI first" and establishing "reasonable evaluation system""[EB/OL]. [2020-03-17].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/J1mmWanTFux8sLRoTHFZFg.
[8] 伍宸. 破“四唯”后, 人才评价制度应该唯什么?[EB/OL]. [2018-11-23].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/GckWpMSqDTX3eWoZbjzuPA.
WU C.After breaking the "four only", what should the talent evaluation system be?[EB/OL]. [2018-11-23].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/GckWpMSqDTX3eWoZbjzuPA.
[9] 范军. “四唯”“五唯”如果只破不立则危害更大[EB/OL]. [2019-04-16].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/GckWpMSqDTX3eWoZbjzuPA.
FAN J."Four only" and "five only": If only broken but not established, the harm will be greater[EB/OL]. [2019-04-16].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/GckWpMSqDTX3eWoZbjzuPA.
[10] 俞立平. 代表作评价应客观对待[EB/OL]. [2018-11-03].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/A7q1meA84CSvXM9VGaqsMA.
YU L P.The evaluation of representative works should be treated objectively[EB/OL]. [2018-11-03].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/A7q1meA84CSvXM9VGaqsMA.
[11] 田国强. 对准确看待高校SCI论文相关指标的几点意见[EB/OL]. [2020-03-02].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/6RajIu4xl4Tn1QzyYo5NwQ.
TIAN G Q.Opinions on the relative indicators of SCI papers in colleges and universities[EB/OL]. [2020-03-02].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/6RajIu4xl4Tn1QzyYo5NwQ.
[12] 钟定胜. 博主献策破“四唯”[EB/OL]. [2018-11-02]. http://news.sciencenet.cn/sbhtmlnews/2018/11/340498.shtm?id=340498.
ZHONG D S. Bloggers give advice to break the "four only"[EB/OL]. [2018-11-02]. http://news.sciencenet.cn/sbhtmlnews/2018/11/340498.shtm?id=340498.
[13] 程雪梅, 戴俊彪. 破除“SCI至上”: 不是否定SCI, 更不是反对发论文[EB/OL]. [2020-03-10].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/V-15w5rQyD_sEHBVSJO-tg.
CHENG X M, DAI J B.Breaking the "SCI supremacy": It is not negating SCI, nor is it against publishing papers[EB/OL].[2020-03-10].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/V-15w5rQyD_sEHBVSJO-tg.
[14] 李志民. 李志民:破除“四唯”, 不能只有管理, 一定要有利益方监督[EB/OL]. [2018-11-10].https://www.eol.cn/rencai/201811/t20181110_1632471.shtml.
LI Z M.Li Zhimin: Breaking the "four only" can not only be managed, but also supervised by the stakeholder[EB/OL].[2018-11-10].https://www.eol.cn/rencai/201811/t20181110_1632471.shtml.
[15] 史元春. 科研评价: 破“五唯”, 立什么?[EB/OL]. [2018-12-18]. http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2018/12/421172.shtm?from=timeline&isappinstalled=0.
SHI Y C. Scientific research evaluation: Breaking the "five only" and establishing what?[EB/OL].[2018-12-18].http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2018/12/421172.shtm?from=timeline&isappinstalled=0.
[16] 陈岐岱. 几点感想[EB/OL]. [2020-03-01].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/2jYl-uCGQZq3ppQkGLlrKw.
CHEN Q D.Some thoughts[EB/OL].[2020-03-01].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/2jYl-uCGQZq3ppQkGLlrKw.
[17] 沙威. “计算电磁学”小领域“破四唯”的思考与建议[EB/OL]. [2020-03-01].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/2jYl-uCGQZq3ppQkGLlrKw.
SHA W.Thoughts and suggestions on "breaking the four only" in the small field of "computational electromagnetics"[EB/OL]. [2020-03-01].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/2jYl-uCGQZq3ppQkGLlrKw.
[18] 刘云. 破“四唯”能解决中国科技评价的问题症结吗?[EB/OL]. [2020-03-03].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/iOpkdWhzlsJsqzLz-WhcXQ.
LIU Y.Can breaking the "four only" solve the crux of China's science and technology evaluation?[EB/OL]. [2020-03-03].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/iOpkdWhzlsJsqzLz-WhcXQ.
[19] 孙珩. 打破“SCI至上”后, 高校青年教师难“出头”了吗?[EB/OL]. [2020-03-03].https://www.jiemodui.com/N/114437.
SUN H.After breaking the "SCI first", is it difficult for young teachers to come out of the way?[EB/OL].[2020-03-03].https://www.jiemodui.com/N/114437.
[20] 王海燕, 张昕妍. 我国科技评价体系改革的困境与对策[J]. 中国软科学, 2018(4): 10-17.
WANG H Y, ZHANG X Y.The predicament and countermeasure of the reform of science and technology evaluation system in China[J]. China soft science, 2018(4): 10-17.
[21] 杨忠泰. 高校科研分类评价探析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2011(12): 9-14, 20.
YANG Z.Study on the evaluation of classification of scientific research in universities[J]. Forum on science and technology in China, 2011(12): 9-14, 20.
[22] 陈德旺. 打破旧四唯, 树立新四看[EB/OL]. [2018-10-16]. http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-57940-1142906.html.
CHEN D W. Break the old four only, set up a new four view[EB/OL]. [2018-10-16].http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-57940-1142906.html.
[23] 李侠. “破四唯”如何下手[EB/OL]. [2020-03-04]. http://www.bulletin.cas.cn/zgkxyyk/ch/reader/view_news.aspx?id=20200304103056581.
LI X. How to start "breaking the four only"[EB/OL]. [2020-03-04]. http://www.bulletin.cas.cn/zgkxyyk/ch/reader/view_news.aspx?id=20200304103056581.
[24] 彭凯平. 人才评价: 破“四唯”, 立什么?[EB/OL]. [2018-11-01]. http://news.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/thunews/9667/2018/20181031152225155160098/20181031152225155160098_.html.
PENG K P. Talent evaluation: Breaking "four only" and establishing what?[EB/OL]. [2018-11-01]. http://news.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/thunews/9667/2018/20181031152225155160098/20181031152225155160098_.html.
[25] 刘业, 褚蓥. 高校破四唯学者: 别再让人才引进的“帽子”飞[EB/OL]. [2018-11-01].https://www.kunming.cn/news/c/2018-11-01/10737947.shtml,.
LIU Y, CHU Y.University scholars: Don't let the "hat" of talent introduction fly[EB/OL]. [2018-11-01].https://www.kunming.cn/news/c/2018-11-01/10737947.shtml.
[26] 朱从明. 江苏省人才评价不再“一把尺子量到底”[EB/OL]. [2019-07-31].https://4g.dahe.cn/mip/edu/20190731519666.
ZHU C M.Talent evaluation in Jiangsu province is no longer "take a ruler to the end."[EB/OL].[2019-07-31]. https://4g.dahe.cn/mip/edu/20190731519666.
[27] 李志民. 不“唯论文”, 我们还能唯什么?[EB/OL]. [2019-12-09].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/D8PMLIvNM1QEXonL63M_NQ.
LI Z M.What else can we do if we don't just focus on papers?[EB/OL]. [2019-12-09].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/D8PMLIvNM1QEXonL63M_NQ.
[28] 张富利, 蔡跃龙. 科研分类管理评价问题研究[J]. 知识经济, 2019(12): 88-89.
ZHANG F L, CAI Y L.Research on classification management and evaluation of scientific research[J]. Knowledge economy, 2019(12): 88-89.
[29] 陈云良, 罗蓉蓉. “学术代表作”制度的实施条件和程序安排[J]. 现代大学教育, 2014(1): 99-105.
CHEN Y L, LUO R R.The conditions and procedures for the implementation of the "academic representative work" system[J]. Modern university education, 2014(1): 99-105.
[30] 王文礼. 人才评价机制如何改革?[EB/OL]. [2018-11-23].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/GckWpMSqDTX3eWoZbjzuPA.
WANG W L.How to reform the talent evaluation mechanism?[EB/OL]. [2018-11-23].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/GckWpMSqDTX3eWoZbjzuPA.
[31] 俞立平. 规范使用SCI下科技评价的问题与解决路径研究[EB/OL]. [2020-03-17]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/RJgYNC8dRlNz-3rXvPYxTw,2020-3-17.
YU L P.Research on the problems and solutions of science and technology evaluation under the standardized use of SCI[EB/OL]. [2020-03-17].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/RJgYNC8dRlNz-3rXvPYxTw.
[32] 李文辉. 去除“四唯”过程中, 警惕矫枉过正和形式化现象[EB/OL]. [2018-11-23].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/GckWpMSqDTX3eWoZbjzuPA.
LI W H.In the process of removing "four only", we should be alert to over correction and formalization[EB/OL]. [2018-11-23].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/GckWpMSqDTX3eWoZbjzuPA.
[33] 叶伟萍, 李林, 黎红中. 高校教师代表作评价的意义和制度保障[J]. 中国人事科学, 2019(9): 35-41.
YE W, LI L, LI H.Representative work evaluation system in professional title evaluation of university teachers[J]. Chinese personnel science, 2019(9): 35-41.
[34] 胡志刚. “破四唯”为什么第一个点名SCI[EB/OL]. [2020-03-05]. http://www.winjpq.com/gupiao/peizimenhu/102802.html.
HU Z G. Why should "breaking the four only" first break the "only SCI"[EB/OL].[2020-03-05]. http://www.winjpq.com/gupiao/peizimenhu/102802.html.
[35] 陈志文. 破除SCI至上, 但不是不要论文[EB/OL]. [2020-02-25].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1659497120634226305&wfr=spider&for=pc.
CHEN Z W.Breaking SCI first, but not without publishing papers[EB/OL]. [2020-02-25].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1659497120634226305&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[36] 方辰. 破除"唯论文""SCI至上" 后, 科研评价该看什么?[EB/OL]. [2020-03-03]. http://k.sina.com.cn/article_5675440730_152485a5a02000rtoc.html.
FANG C. What should we do in the evaluation of scientific research after we break away from the "only paper" and "SCI supremacy"?[EB/OL]. [2020-03-03]. http://k.sina.com.cn/article_5675440730_152485a5a02000rtoc.html.
[37] 程宗明. 论文的“唯”和“不唯”: 谁要“唯”, 谁“不要唯”[EB/OL]. [2019-04-03].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/lTlGTUxoRZE5Jd4cBmmxyw.
CHENG Z M.The "only" and "not only" of the paper: who should be "only" and "who should not only"[EB/OL]. [2019-04-03].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/lTlGTUxoRZE5Jd4cBmmxyw.
[38] 石锦卫. 不崇拜但是要尊重SCI[EB/OL]. [2020-03-01].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/2jYl-uCGQZq3ppQkGLlrKw0.
SHI J W .Do not worship SCI, but respect SCI[EB/OL]. [2020-03-01].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/2jYl-uCGQZq3ppQkGLlrKw.
[39] 募格学术. 破除“SCI至上”后, 青椒们又该何去何从?[EB/OL]. [2020-03-26]. http://www.360doc.com/content/20/0326/19/12776403_901867354.shtml.
Muge academics. After breaking the "SCI only", where should young teachers go?[EB/OL]. [2020-03-26]. http://www.360doc.com/content/20/0326/19/12776403_901867354.shtml.
[40] 苏新宁. 促进学术创新才是学术评价的根本[EB/OL]. [2020-03-17].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XybmIoaau9urwtyRDlPqCg.
SU X N.Promoting academic innovation is the foundation of academic evaluation[EB/OL]. [2020-03-17].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XybmIoaau9urwtyRDlPqCg.
[41] 龚江宏. 破除唯论文后, 可能迎来“唯三高、唯卓越”……[EB/OL]. [2020-03-09]. http://www.zzqklm.com/w/qz/26557.html.
GONG J H. After breaking away from the only thesis, it is possible to usher in the "three high, only outstanding"…[EB/OL]. [2020-03-09]. http://www.zzqklm.com/w/qz/26557.html.
[42] 刘闯. 警惕"SCI崇拜" 推动科技期刊高质量发展[EB/OL]. [2019-08-06]. http://media.people.com.cn/n1/2019/0806/c40606-31279143.html.
LIU C. Guard against "SCI worship" and promote high quality development of technology journals[EB/OL]. [2019-08-06]. http://media.people.com.cn/n1/2019/0806/c40606-31279143.html.
[43] 汪晓军. 专家:破“唯SCI”, 先从破国内期刊“版面费”开始, 博士、青椒还是鼓励发SCI！[EB/OL]. [2020-03-20].https://www.baidu.com/link?url=8LenZL8-1V_N7ph5K5ZYuDcHg-iJYGjqSiwsEFTG-UJ4gwahG_ekml0ckUGKKj6KA-QfgwqdCP8x5vdYUATmHK&wd=&eqid=d7367273003c4128000000045e80a458.
WANG X J.Experts: To break the "sci only" policy, we should first remove the cost of domestic journal layout. Doctors and young teachers are still encouraged to publish SCI papers![EB/OL]. [2020-03-20]. https://www.baidu.com/link?url=8LenZL8-1V_Nph5K5ZYuDcHg-iJYGjqSiwsEFTG-UJ4gwahG_ekml0ckUGKKj6KA-QfgwqdCP8x5vdYUATmHK&wd=&eqid=d7367273003c4128000000045e80a458.
[44] 朱邦芬. 不走“行政化”老路, 不要“唯SCI”, 中文科技期刊要做什么?[EB/OL]. [2018-09-18].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/F0FzHPgL-fkUd7I_CC9PwA.
ZHU B F.What should Chinese technology journals do if they do not follow the old road of "administration" and "SCI only"?[EB/OL]. [2018-09-18].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/F0FzHPgL-fkUd7I_CC9PwA.
[45] 科技部. 科技部印发《关于破除科技评价中"唯论文"不良导向的若干措施(试行)》的通知[EB/OL]. [2020-06-23]. http://stic.sz.gov.cn/gkmlpt/content/7/7815/post_7815774.html?jump=false#4186.
Ministry of science and technology. Ministry of science and technology issued the notice on measures to eliminate the bad guidance of "only paper" in scientific and technological evaluation (trial implementation)[EB/OL]. [2020-06-23]. http://stic.sz.gov.cn/gkmlpt/content/7/7815/post_7815774.html?jump=false#4186.
[46] 钟永恒, 邢霞, 刘佳, 等. 2006—2016年我国省域基础研究竞争力分析——基于国家自然科学基金[J]. 科技管理研究, 2017, 37(24): 1-9.
ZHONG Y, XIA X, JIA L, et al.Analysis on provincial basic research competitiveness during 2006-2016: Based on national natural science foundation of China[J]. Science and technology management research. 2017, 37(24): 1-9.
[47] 姜春林, 赵宇航. 代表作评价: 探索之路与完善之策[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2016(3): 143-148.
JIANG C L, ZHAO Y H.The evaluation of representative works: The way of exploration and the strategy of perfection[J]. Gansu shehui kexue, 2016(3): 143-148.
[48] 杜学亮. 代表作评价制度的困境与出路[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2019(2): 74-79, 207.
DU X L.Dilemma and outlet of the representative work evaluation system[J]. Journal of CUPL, 2019(2): 74-79, 207.
[49] 陈云伟. 科技评价计量方法述评[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(8): 4-11.
CHEN Y W.Review on quantitative methods of science and technology evaluation[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2020, 32(8): 4-11.
[50] 付丽丽, 刘垠. 破除“四唯”后, 人才究竟该如何评价[EB/OL]. [2019-03-07]. http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2019/3/423615.shtm.
FU L L, LIU Y. After breaking the "four only", how should we evaluate talents[EB/OL]. [2019-03-07]. http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2019/3/423615.shtm.