社交机器人在信息行为研究中的概念、任务及应用

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.24-0093

Abstract

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] The advent and emergence of social robots represent a closer development trend in human-computer interaction. However, the study of the information behavior of social robots faces many challenges that arise from the need to simulate human social behavior. This challenge includes technical hurdles such as a multi-level understanding of human emotions, extraction of multi-modal information features, situational awareness, as well as the establishment of long-term user profiling, data privacy, and ethical considerations in personalized interaction. However, existing research tends to focus narrowly on specific applications and lacks a holistic review. This paper attempts to provide a thorough review of both domestic and international studies of social robots in the area of information behavior. It aims to elucidate the theoretical evolution and technological foundations of social robots, thereby enriching our understanding of their role in the landscape of information behavior research. [Method/Process] Using a rigorous literature review methodology, we meticulously analyze the current state and prospective trajectory of research on the information behavior of social robots. First, we extract and scrutinize the theoretical foundations and salient research topics within the field. We then delineate the core tasks of social robots, which include data acquisition, language processing, emotion analysis, information retrieval, and intelligent communication. Furthermore, we synthesize research on the information behavior of social robots in various application domains such as education, healthcare, and service sectors. We delve into the intricacies of human-computer interaction in these contexts and provide comprehensive insights. Finally, we explore future directions in the field. [Results/Conclusions] Our examination of the information behavior of social robots reveals both promising potential and notable challenges. This paper provides a fundamental elucidation of the social robot concept, identifies current research foci, and addresses prevailing challenges. Regarding the construction of data resource and related technologies, we systematically delineate the task architecture of social robots, and highlight their wide-ranging applications in various domains. Furthermore, we provide an in-depth examination of human-computer interaction scenarios in critical domains such as education, healthcare, and service delivery, offering prescient guidance for future research efforts in social robotics. Nonetheless, our findings underscore the nascent stage of development of social robotics, which requires a concerted focus on advancing interaction quality assessment, enhancing social cognitive capabilities, managing user information disclosure, and refining emotional intelligence. By prioritizing these avenues, we aim to improve the quality of human-robot interaction and provide users with enriched and personalized service experiences, thereby catalyzing the continued evolution and broader integration of social robotics technology.

Key words: social robot, information behavior, human-computer interaction, development context, systematic review

CLC Number:

G251.3

LIU Yang, LYU Shuyue, LI Ruojun. Concept, Task, and Application of Social Robots in Information Behavior Research[J].Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2024, 36(3): 4-20.

References

[1] 刘洋, 柳卓心, 金昊, 等. 基于BERTopic模型的用户层次化需求及动机分析——以抖音平台为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2023, 42(12): 159-167.
LIU Y, LIU Z X, JIN H, et al.User hierarchical need and motivation analysis ased on BERTopic model: Taking Douyin platform as an example[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2023, 42(12): 159-167.
[2] ARND-CADDIGAN M.Sherry turkle: Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other[J]. Clinical social work journal, 2015, 43(2): 247-248.
[3] BLUT M, WANG C, WÜNDERLICH N V, et al. Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: A meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI[J]. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 2021, 49(4): 632-658.
[4] 张洪忠, 段泽宁, 韩秀. 异类还是共生: 社交媒体中的社交机器人研究路径探讨[J]. 新闻界, 2019(2): 10-17.
ZHANG H Z, DUAN Z N, HAN X.Heterogeneity or symbiosis: Research path of social robots in social media[J]. Journalism and mass communication monthly, 2019(2): 10-17.
[5] BOSHMAF Y, MUSLUKHOV I, BEZNOSOV K, et al.The socialbot network: When bots socialize for fame and money[C]//Proceedings of the 27th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. New York: ACM, 2011: 93-102.
[6] SEKINO H, KASANO E, HSIEH W F, et al.Robot behavior design expressing confidence/unconfidence based on human behavior analysis[C]//2020 17th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots(UR). Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE, 2020: 278-283.
[7] WILSON T D.Human information behavior[J]. Informing science, 2000, 3(2): 49-55.
[8] FISHER K E, JULIEN H.Information behavior[J]. Annual review of information science and technology, 2009, 43: 1-73.
[9] 邓卫斌, 于国龙. 社交机器人发展现状及关键技术研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(12): 163-170.
DENG W B, YU G L.Development and key technology of social robot[J]. Science technology and engineering, 2016, 16(12): 163-170.
[10] HEUER T, SCHIERING I, GERNDT R.Privacy-centered design for social robots[J]. 2019, 20(3): 509-529.
[11] WEBB H, JIROTKA M, WINFIELD A F T, et al. Human-robot relationships and the development of responsible social robots[C]//Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019. New York: ACM, 2019, 12: 1-7.
[12] MANSO L J, NŨNEZ P, CALDERITA L V, et al. SocNav1: A dataset to benchmark and learn social navigation conventions[J]. Data, 2020, 5(1): 7.
[13] WU B.Detecting malicious social robots with generative adversarial networks[J]. KSII transactions on Internet and information systems, 2019, 13(11): 5594-5515.
[14] CHEN C N, GARROD O G B, ZHAN J Y, et al. Reverse engineer-ing psychologically valid facial expressions of emotion into social robots[C]//2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition(FG 2018). Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE, 2018: 448-452.
[15] CHEN C N, HENSEL L B, DUAN Y C, et al.Equipping social robots with culturally-sensitive facial expressions of emotion using data-driven methods[C]//2019 14th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2019). Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE, 2019: 1-8.
[16] NGUYEN D M, NAZERI M, PAYANDEH A, et al.Toward human-like social robot navigation: A large-scale, multi-modal, social human navigation dataset[C]//2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems(IROS). Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE, 2023: 7442-7447.
[17] CHEN H N, TAN H, KUNTZ A, et al.Enabling robots to understand incomplete natural language instructions using commonsense reasoning[C]//2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation(ICRA). Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE, 2020: 1963-1969.
[18] 韩文静, 李海峰, 阮华斌, 等. 语音情感识别研究进展综述[J]. 软件学报, 2014, 25(1): 37-50.
HAN W J, LI H F, RUAN H B, et al.Review on speech emotion recognition[J]. Journal of software, 2014, 25(1): 37-50.
[19] 刘洋, 马莉莉, 张雯, 等. 基于跨模态深度学习的旅游评论反讽识别[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(12): 23-31.
LIU Y, MA L L, ZHANG W, et al.Detecting sarcasm from travel reviews based on cross-modal deep learning[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2022, 6(12): 23-31.
[20] 陈晨, 朱晴晴, 严睿, 等. 基于深度学习的开放领域对话系统研究综述[J]. 计算机学报, 2019, 42(7): 1439-1466.
CHEN C, ZHU Q Q, YAN R, et al.Survey on deep learning based open domain dialogue system[J]. Chinese journal of computers, 2019, 42(7): 1439-1466.
[21] 贾熹滨, 李让, 胡长建, 等. 智能对话系统研究综述[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2017, 43(9): 1344-1356.
JIA X B, LI R, HU C J, et al.Review of intelligent dialogue system[J]. Journal of Beijing university of technology, 2017, 43(9): 1344-1356.
[22] FANASWALA I. Human-robot interaction in an Arabic social and cultural setting[J]. Qatar foundation annual research forum proceedings, 2011(2011): CSP27.
[23] LALLEE S, HAMANN K, STEINWENDER J, et al.Cooperative human robot interaction systems: IV. Communication of shared plans with Naive humans using gaze and speech[C]//2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE, 2013: 129-136.
[24] AHMAD M I, MUBIN O, ORLANDO J.Understanding behaviours and roles for social and adaptive robots in education: Teacher's per-spective[C]//Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction. New York: ACM, 2016: 297-304.
[25] HEDAOO S, WILLIAMS A, WADGAONKAR C, et al.A robot barista comments on its clients: Social attitudes toward robot data use[C]//2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE, 2019: 66-74.
[26] SIRITHUNGE C, JAYASEKARA A G B P, CHANDIMA D P. Proactive robots with the perception of nonverbal human behavior: A review[J]. IEEE access, 2019, 7: 77308-77327.
[27] LOUIE B, BJÖRLING E A, KUO A C. The desire for social robots to support English language learners: Exploring robot perceptions of teachers, parents, and students[J]. Frontiers in education, 2021, 6: 566909.
[28] AHMED E, AHTINEN A.Design implications for a virtual language learning companion robot: Considering the appearance, interaction and rewarding behavior[C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction. New York: ACM, 2021: 56-65.
[29] LIAO Y X, YAN M R, LI X Q.A formal framework for robot to understand compound concepts[J]. Journal of physics: Conference series, 2021, 1846(1): 012035.
[30] PICARD. Affective computing[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press, 1997.
[31] 罗森林, 潘丽敏. 情感计算理论与技术[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2003, 25(7): 905-909.
LUO S L, PAN L M.Theory and technology on affctive computing[J]. Systems engineering and electronics, 2003, 25(7): 905-909.
[32] EMYS-Emotive head of a social robot[J]. International journal of social robotics, 2013, 5(2): 237-249.
[33] MATHUR M B, REICHLING D B.Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley[J]. Cognition, 2016, 146: 22-32.
[34] CHEN T L, KING C H A, THOMAZ A L, et al. An investigation of responses to robot-initiated touch in a nursing context[J]. Interna-tional journal of social robotics, 2014, 6(1): 141-161.
[35] ROBINS B, DAUTENHAHN K.Tactile interactions with a humanoid robot: Novel play scenario implementations with children with autism[J]. International journal of social robotics, 2014, 6(3): 397-415.
[36] AMMI M, DEMULIER V, CAILLOU S, et al.Haptic human-robot affective interaction in a handshaking social protocol[C]//Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York: ACM, 2015: 263-270.
[37] ALONSO-MARTíN F, MALFAZ M, SEQUEIRA J, et al. A multimodal emotion detection system during human-robot interaction[J]. Sensors, 2013, 13(11): 15549-15581.
[38] SONG S C, YAMADA S.Expressing emotions through color, sound, and vibration with an appearance-constrained social robot[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York: ACM, 2017: 2-11.
[39] TERKEN J, JORIS I, DE VALK L.Multimodalcues for addressee- hood in triadic communication with a human information retrieval agent[C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Multi-modal Interfaces. New York: ACM, 2007: 94-101.
[40] TONG G F, LIU R, TAN J D.3D Information retrieval in Mobile Robot Vision based on spherical compound eye[C]//2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE, 2011: 1895-1900.
[41] WANG L J, LIU M, MENG M Q H. Hierarchical auction-based mechanism for real-time resource retrieval in cloud mobile robotic system[C]//2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE, 2014: 2164-2169.
[42] DENG R R, WU Y H.Information retrieval and data mining based on open network knowledge[C]//Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Mechatronics, Materials, Chemistry and Computer Engineering 2015. Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2015: 261-263.
[43] ASEMI A, KO A, NOWKARIZI M.Intelligent libraries: A review on expert systems, artificial intelligence, and robot[J]. Library hi tech, 2021, 39(2): 412-434.
[44] KENNEDY J, LEMAIGNAN S, MONTASSIER C, et al.Child speech recognition in human-robot interaction: Evaluations and recommendations[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York: ACM, 2017: 82-90.
[45] SUTSKEVER I, VINYALS O, LE Q V. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks[J/OL]. arXiv: 1409.3215, 2014. http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3215.
[46] ADMONI H, SCASSELLATI B.Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction: A review[J]. Journal of human-robot interaction, 2017, 6(1): 25.
[47] SALEM M, KOPP S, WACHSMUTH I, et al.Generation and evaluation of communicative robot gesture[J]. International journal of social robotics, 2012, 4(2): 201-217.
[48] VAN DEN BERGHE R, VERHAGEN J, OUDGENOEG-PAZ O, et al. Social robots for language learning: A review[J]. Review of edu-cational research, 2019, 89(2): 259-295.
[49] KORY J, BREAZEAL C.Storytelling with robots: Learning compan-ions for preschool children's language development[C]//The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE, 2014: 643-648.
[50] GORDON G, BREAZEAL C, ENGEL S.Can children catch curiosity from a social robot?[C]//Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York: ACM, 2015: 91-98.
[51] CONTI D, DI NUOVO S, BUONO S, et al.Robots in education and care of children with developmental disabilities: A study on acceptance by experienced and future professionals[J]. International journal of social robotics, 2017, 9(1): 51-62.
[52] KENNEDY J, BAXTER P, BELPAEME T.The robot who tried too hard: Social behaviour of a robot tutor can negatively affect child learning[C]//Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE Interna-tional Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York: ACM, 2015: 67-74.
[53] SHARKEY A J C. Should we welcome robot teachers?[J]. Ethics and information technology, 2016, 18(4): 283-297.
[54] SERHOLT S, BARENDREGT W, VASALOU A, et al.The case of classroom robots: Teachers' deliberations on the ethical tensions[J]. AI & society, 2017, 32(4): 613-631.
[55] ARKIN R C, ULAM P, WAGNER A R.Moral decision making in autonomous systems: Enforcement, moral emotions, dignity, trust, and deception[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100(3): 571-589.
[56] HUIJNEN C A G J, LEXIS M A S, JANSENS R, et al. Mapping robots to therapy and educational objectives for children with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2016, 46(6): 2100-2114.
[57] 王永固, 黄碧玉, 李晓娟, 等. 自闭症儿童社交机器人干预研究述评与展望[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2018(1): 32-38.
WANG Y G, HUANG B Y, LI X J, et al.A review and prospect of intervention on autistic children by social robots[J]. Chinese journal of special education, 2018(1): 32-38.
[58] 范晓壮. 机器人用于自闭症谱系障碍儿童社交技能干预研究的综述[J]. 现代特殊教育, 2015(14): 34-37, 57.
FAN X Z.A review of applying robots to intervent the social skills of children with autism[J]. A journal of modern special education, 2015(14): 34-37, 57.
[59] WAINER J, DAUTENHAHN K, ROBINS B, et al.A pilot study with a novel setup for collaborative play of the humanoid robot KASPAR with children with autism[J]. International journal of social robotics, 2014, 6(1): 45-65.
[60] BEKELE E T, LAHIRI U, SWANSON A R, et al.A step towards developing adaptive robot-mediated intervention architecture (ARIA) for children with autism[J]. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering, 2013, 21(2): 289-299.
[61] CABIBIHAN J J, JAVED H, ANG M, et al.Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism[J]. International journal of social robotics, 2013, 5(4): 593-618.
[62] DIEHL J J, SCHMITT L M, VILLANO M, et al.The clinical use of robots for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A critical review[J]. Research in autism spectrum disorders, 2012, 6(1): 249-262.
[63] ABDI J, AL-HINDAWI A, NG T, et al.Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care[J]. BMJ open, 2018, 8(2): e018815.
[64] CAVALLO F, LIMOSANI R, MANZI A, et al.Development of a socially believable multi-robot solution from town to home[J]. Cognitive comp utation, 2014, 6(4): 954-967.
[65] TAKAYANAGI K, KIRITA T, SHIBATA T.Comparison of verbal and emotional responses of elderly people with mild/moderate dementia and those with severe dementia in responses to seal robot, PARO[J]. Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2014, 6: 257.
[66] MITZNER T L, CHEN T L, KEMP C C, et al.Identifying the potential for robotics to assist older adults in different living environments[J]. International journal of social robotics, 2014, 6(2): 213-227.
[67] PU L H, MOYLE W, JONES C, et al.The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies[J]. The gerontologist, 2019, 59(1): e37-e51.
[68] WANG R H, SUDHAMA A, BEGUM M, et al.Robots to assist daily activities: Views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers[J]. International psychogeriatrics, 2017, 29(1): 67-79.
[69] ČAIĆ M, ODEKERKEN-SCHRÖDER G, MAHR D. Service robots: Value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks[J]. Journal of service management, 2018, 29(2): 178-205.
[70] LOURENÇÃO M, DE MOURA ENGRACIA GIRALDI J, DE OLIVEIRA J H C. Destination advertisement semiotic signs: Analysing tourists' visual attention and perceived ad effectiveness[J]. Annals of tourism research, 2020, 84: 103001.
[71] FISKE A, HENNINGSEN P, BUYX A.Your robot therapist will see you now: Ethical implications of embodied artificial intelligence in psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy[J]. Journal of medical Internet research, 2019, 21(5): e13216.
[72] CHUNG M, KO E, JOUNG H, et al.Chatbot e-service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands[J]. Journal of business research, 2020, 117: 587-595.
[73] KIM S S, KIM J, BADU-BAIDEN F, et al.Preference for robot service or human service in hotels? Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. International journal of hospitality management, 2021, 93: 102795.
[74] MENDE M, SCOTT M L, VAN DOORN J, et al.Service robots rising: How humanoid robots influence service experiences and elicit compensatory consumer responses[J]. Journal of marketing research, 2019, 56(4): 535-556.
[75] DE KERVENOAEL R, HASAN R, SCHWOB A, et al.Leveraging human-robot interaction in hospitality services: Incorporating the role of perceived value, empathy, and information sharing into visitors' intentions to use social robots[J]. Tourism management, 2020, 78: 104042.
[76] FERNANDES T, OLIVEIRA E.Understanding consumers' accep-tance of automated technologies in service encounters: Drivers of digital voice assistants adoption[J]. Journal of business research, 2021, 122: 180-191.
[77] VAN PINXTEREN M M E, WETZELS R W H, RUGER J, et al. Trust in humanoid robots: Implications for services marketing[J]. Journal of services marketing, 2019, 33(4): 507-518.
[78] BRŠČIĆ D, KIDOKORO H, SUEHIRO Y, et al. Escaping from children's abuse of social robots[C]//Proceedings of the Tenth An-nual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York: ACM, 2015: 59-66.
[79] FERRARA E, VAROL O, DAVIS C, et al.The rise of social bots[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2016, 59(7): 96-104.
[80] 师文, 陈昌凤. 分布与互动模式:社交机器人操纵Twitter上的中国议题研究[J]. 国际新闻界, 2020, 42(5): 61-80.
SHI W, CHEN C F.Distribution and interaction patterns: How social bots manipulate the Chinese-related issues on twitter[J]. Chinese journal of journalism & communication, 2020, 42(5): 61-80.
[81] 师文, 陈昌凤. 社交机器人在新闻扩散中的角色和行为模式研究——基于《纽约时报》“修例”风波报道在Twitter上扩散的分析[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2020, 27(5): 5-20, 126.
SHI W, CHEN C F.The role and behavior pattern of social bots in the diffusion of news: An analysis of the spread of coverages of Hong Kong's anti-amendment bill campaign by the New York times on twitter[J]. Journalism & communication, 2020, 27(5): 5-20, 126.
[82] 刘蓉, 陈波, 于泠, 等. 恶意社交机器人检测技术研究[J]. 通信学报, 2017, 38(S2): 197-210.
LIU R, CHEN B, YU L, et al.Research on detection technology of malicious social robots[J]. Journal on communications, 2017, 38(S2): 197-210.
[83] LIU Y.Depression detection via a Chinese social media platform: A novel causal relation-aware deep learning approach[J]. The journal of supercomputing, 2023: 1-30.
[84] 刘洋, 段宇杰, 张鑫, 等. 今天你上“小红书”了吗?在线社区用户信息分享的主题提取与动机分析[J/OL]. 图书情报知识, 2024: 1-12.http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1085.G2.20240109.1739.002.html.
LIU Y, DUAN Y J, ZHANG X, et al. Have you been on "Little Red Book" today? Topic extraction and motivation analysis of user infor-mation sharing in online communities[J/OL]. Documentation, infor-mation and knowledge, 2024: 1-12. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1085.G2.20240109.1739.002.html.
[85] ROYAKKERS L, VAN EST R.A literature review on new robotics: Automation from love to war[J]. International journal of social robotics, 2015, 7(5): 549-570.
[86] COECKELBERGH M.Can we trust robots?[J]. Ethics and information technology, 2012, 14(1): 53-60.
[87] WU Y H, WROBEL J, CORNUET M, et al.Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: A mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the living lab setting[J]. Clinical interventions in aging, 2014: 801.
[88] WIESE E, METTA G, WYKOWSKA A.Robots as intentional agents: Using neuroscientific methods to make robots appear more social[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2017, 8: 1663.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Concept, Task, and Application of Social Robots in Information Behavior Research

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHOU Xin. Machine Functionalism and the Digital-Intelligence Divide: Evolutionary Pathways, Generative Logic and Regulatory Strategies [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2024, 36(3): 59-71.
[2]	SHI Yanqing, LI Lu, SHI Qin. Impact of User Heterogeneity on Knowledge Collaboration Effectiveness from a Network Structure Perspective [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2024, 36(3): 72-82.
[3]	WANG Yueying. Exploring the Causes of Low Health Information Literacy Among Rural Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults and its Improvement Strategies [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2024, 36(2): 81-93.
[4]	WANG Weizheng, QIAO Hong, LI Xiaojun, WANG Jingjing. User Willingness to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence Based on AIDUA Framework [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2024, 36(2): 36-50.
[5]	XIE Yanjie. Review of Public Library Services to the Elderly in China [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(7): 18-26.
[6]	LI Jing. Causes of Intergenerational Conflict Heath Information Behavior and Its Mechanism in Social Control in the Context of Public Health Emergencies [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(5): 74-88.
[7]	XIAO Yun, XU Huanhuan, XIAO Yayuan, ZHAO Youlin, PANG Hangyuan. User Preference Mining in Digital Community Based on CLV Preference Mining Model [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(2): 45-60.
[8]	JIANG Zhihui, LI Xuan, CAO Gaohui. Causes and Influence Paths of Digital Stress among Social Media Users [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(11): 64-76.
[9]	GUO Pengrui, WEN Tingxiao. Research of the Impact of LLMs on Information Retrieval Systems and Users' Information Retrieval Behavior [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(11): 13-22.
[10]	KE Tingjuan, ZENG Zhen. Problems and Influencing Factors of Rural Information Dissemination under Different Themes [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 14-26.
[11]	XING Fei, LIU Caihua, CHAI Xuefei, PENG Guochao. Influencing Factors of Elderly Users' Health Information Adoption Behavior Based on Social Platforms: Taking WeChat as an Example [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 53-64.
[12]	HUANG Taihua, ZHANG Tao, WANG Lei. Construction of College Students' "Consumption-Academic-Social" Profiles from the Perspective of Multi-source Data Fusion [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 76-87.
[13]	FU Lihong, HAN Lu. The Influencing Mechanism of Postgraduates' Trust in Academic Information Consumption and Intensification Strategy [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(6): 72-82.
[14]	ZHANG Yu, HUO Mingkui. An Investigation into Information Needs of Rural Entrepreneurial Youth in the Context of Rural Revitalization: Based on the Survey in Heilongjiang, Jilin and Liaoning Provinces [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(3): 51-60.
[15]	LI Xuguang, XIAO Siqi, LI Shanshan, ZHANG Heng. Research on User Profiles of Xiaomi Community Based on Knowledge Behavior [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(8): 4-12.