Abstract: Core journals of forestry science and technology in multiple evaluation system of present situation has carried on the contrast analysis, the results show the difference of evaluation institutions (included the total number of source journals, measurement indicators statistical sources, classification and measurement index weights of different disciplines, etc) lead to the comparison among forestry journals not easy.However, the total direction of current evaluation institutions assess the core journals are consistent with each other, core journal rankings with in a few significant impact factors and cited frequency of the data in the database sorting is basically consistent.Through interpretation of forestry science and technology core journals in multiple evaluation index of the database, prompt journals should adhere to its publication idea, start with absorb high levels of this discipline papers, try to discipline related papers published in this journal belongs to, go the way of subject development.As journal editors in articles published in the journal can give reference for researchers in this industry, at the same time to track the periodical evaluation database searches and other tools, pay close attention to each index weight change, understand various statistical index adjustment trend, actively follow up the periodicals’ development in database and ranking in core journals, find the gap between journals through efforts to improve the comprehensive influence of journals.

Key words: Forestry