中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 56-68.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.24-0561

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Technical Alienation and Promotion of Rural Public Digital Cultural Services: Based on the "Value-Institution-Behavior" Analytical Framework

Yinggang WENG1,2   

  1. 1. School of Marxism, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571127
    2. Shaanxi Unified Front Theory and Practice Research Center, Xi'an 710199
  • Received:2024-06-21 Online:2024-08-05 Published:2024-12-13

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] Rural public digital cultural service is a new module of public cultural service, and the current relevant research mainly starts from two independent perspectives, namely external institutional structure and internal subjective action, and constructs the research paradigm of "system-behavior". However, this framework still has room for improvement in order to reveal the phenomenon of "technical alienation" in practice. "Technological alienation" is essentially a deviation from the value level, and the original framework is difficult to effectively reveal the influence of value on the impact of digital technology on rural public cultural services, so this study introduces the value factor to provide new theoretical perspectives and analytical frameworks for the existing research, in order to comprehensively reveal the underlying logic of "technological alienation" and to find the path of digital technology-enabled rural public cultural services. [Method/Process] Starting from the current situation of rural public digital cultural services, this study constructs a three-dimensional analysis framework of "value-institution-behavior" and applies the extended case study method to the case of Y Township in Zhejiang Province to explore the phenomenon of "technological alienation" of rural public digital cultural services, such as the de-domainization of public cultural service content, information risk aggregation, and "digital authoritarian" production, which is caused by the fragmented value, institutional imbalance, and unruly action. This "technological alienation" has seriously affected the effectiveness of public digital cultural services. [Results/Conclusions] According to the specific elements of the three-dimensional analysis framework of "values-institutions-behavior" alignment, combined with the extended case study method focusing on the study of macro-micro interactions, it is proposed that the people-centered value concept guides the goal of building rural public digital cultural services, a more complete institutional system protects the process of building rural public digital cultural services, and a more standardized subjective behavior shares the results of building rural public digital cultural services. Based on the above paths, the "technical alienation" of rural public digital cultural services will be abandoned. This study still has shortcomings in the use of research methods in this field, while the framework of "value-institution-behavior" has some explanatory power, but still differs from the complex reality of the society due to the lack of empirical material. In the future, we plan to increase the empirical research on rural public digital cultural services to verify the conclusions of this study and to further refine the measurement of the level of rural public digital cultural services.

Key words: rural public digital cultural services, technological alienation, value concept, institution building, individual behavior

CLC Number: 

  • G249.27

Fig.1

Public digital cultural services in villages to the outside world"

Fig.2

Value-institution-behaviour analytical framework for public digital cultural services in rural areas"

1
韩兆柱, 杨洋. 整体性治理理论研究及应用[J]. 教学与研究, 2013(6): 80-86.
HAN Z Z, YANG Y. On the theory of holistic governance: Research and application[J]. Teaching and research, 2013(6): 80-86.
2
华钰文, 陈雅, 王锰. 我国文化数字化治理体系构建及要素分析研究[J]. 图书馆, 2023(10): 69-75.
HUA Y W, CHEN Y, WANG M. Research on the systematic construction and elemental analysis of China's cultural digitization governance[J]. Library, 2023(10): 69-75.
3
王锰, 郑建明. 整体性治理视角下的数字文化治理体系[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2015, 35(10): 20-24.
WANG M, ZHENG J M. Research on the digital culture governance system based on holistic governance theory[J]. Library tribune, 2015, 35(10): 20-24.
4
张照龙, 方堃. 趋于整体性治理的公共文化服务数字协同研究——以文化共享工程为考察对象[J]. 电子政务, 2012(7): 68-75.
ZHANG Z L, FANG K. Research on digital collaboration of public cultural services towards holistic governance - Taking the cultural sharing project as an investigation object[J]. E-Government, 2012(7): 68-75.
5
戴艳清, 刘杨庆. 公共数字文化均衡化发展制度研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2022(1): 18-24.
DAI Y Q, LIU Y Q. A research on the balanced development system of public digital culture[J]. Research on library science, 2022(1): 18-24.
6
王子健, 完颜邓邓. 政策工具视角下我国公共数字文化服务政策文本分析[J]. 图书馆建设, 2023(2): 117-130.
WANG Z J, WANYAN D D. Policy text analysis of public digital cultural service in China from the perspective of policy tools[J]. Library development, 2023(2): 117-130.
7
完颜邓邓, 王文斐. 公众参与公共数字文化建设的实践探索与推进策略[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2020, 29(3): 94-103.
WANYAN D D, WANG W F. Practice exploration and promotion strategies of public participation in public digital cultural construction[J]. Journal of the national library of China, 2020, 29(3): 94-103.
8
戴艳清, 何晓霞, 郑燃. 公共数字文化服务效能提升的制度优化[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2021, 41(8): 26-33.
DAI Y Q, HE X X, ZHENG R. System optimization for improving the efficiency of public digital cultural services[J]. Library tribune, 2021, 41(8): 26-33.
9
巫程成. 乡村公共文化服务智慧化实践类型与政策路径——基于“理念-制度-技术”分析框架[J]. 宁夏社会科学, 2023(5): 146-155.
WU C C. Practice types and policy paths of rural public cultural services intelligentization - Based on the analysis framework of "idea-system-technology"[J]. Ningxia social sciences, 2023(5): 146-155.
10
王鸑飞, 卢垚, 袁雪, 等. 西部地区科技文献资源保障策略研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2023, 35(12): 94-103.
WANG Y F, LU Y, YUAN X, et al. Security strategy of scientific and technological literature resources in western regions of China[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2023, 35(12): 94-103.
11
罗娟. 过程型逻辑: 数字乡村建设背景下农村公共文化服务可及性的实现机制[J]. 农村经济, 2022(10): 82-90.
LUO J. Process logic: The realization mechanism of accessibility of rural public cultural services under the background of digital village construction[J]. Rural economy, 2022(10): 82-90.
12
周萍, 陈雅. 公共文化服务数字化转型中的风险演化特征与控制策略研究[J]. 图书馆, 2022(6): 7-13.
ZHOU P, CHEN Y. Research on the evolutionary characteristics and control strategies of risks in the digital transformation of public cultural services[J]. Library, 2022(6): 7-13.
13
陈一, 肖希明. 公共数字文化资源整合中的知识产权风险与管理对策[J]. 图书与情报, 2015(4): 57-62.
CHEN Y, XIAO X M. Intellectual property risk and management strategy of the integration of public digital cultural resources[J]. Library & information, 2015(4): 57-62.
14
罗峰. 体制性空间下的农村社区服务——一个初步的解释框架[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018, 57(1): 47-54.
LUO F. Rural community service in institutional space - A preliminary framework for interpretation[J]. Journal of central China normal university (humanities and social sciences), 2018, 57(1): 47-54.
15
美)B.盖伊·彼得斯. 王向民, 段红伟, 译. 政治科学中的制度理论: 新制度主义[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2016: 50.
B.GUY P. Institutional theory in political science[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2016: 50.
16
崔珊珊. 局限与应对: 理性选择制度主义的制度变迁研究[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2017(11): 25-30.
CUI S S. Limitation and countermeasures: A study on the institutional change of rational choice institutionalism[J]. Hubei social sciences, 2017(11): 25-30.
17
卢晖临, 李雪. 如何走出个案——从个案研究到扩展个案研究[J]. 中国社会科学, 2007(1): 118-130, 207-208.
LU H L, LI X. How can we go beyond the case? From the case study to the extended case study[J]. Social sciences in China, 2007(1): 118-130, 207-208.
18
韦建桦, 主编. 马克思恩格斯文集-2: 1848-1859年[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 580.
19
陈昌凤, 石泽. 技术与价值的理性交往: 人工智能时代信息传播——算法推荐中工具理性与价值理性的思考[J]. 新闻战线, 2017(17): 71-74.
CHEN C F, SHI Z. Rational communication between technology and value: Information dissemination in the era of artificial intelligence - Reflections on instrumental rationality and value rationality in algorithm recommendation[J]. The press, 2017(17): 71-74.
20
许丹. 从“失衡”迈向“适配”: 乡村治理数字化转型的适应性风险及纾解路径[J]. 政治学研究, 2024(2): 108-118, 260.
XU D. From "imbalance" to "adaptation": Adaptive risks and mitigation paths for the digital transformation of rural governance[J]. CASS journal of political science, 2024(2): 108-118, 260.
21
张现洪. 技术插件: 一种对政府技术治理外包的解释视角[J]. 浙江学刊, 2023(6): 50-59.
ZHANG X H. Technology plug-in: An explanatory perspective on government technology governance outsourcing[J]. Zhejiang academic journal, 2023(6): 50-59.
[1] ZHAO Xueqin, LI Tian'e, HU Huihui. Analysis and Enlightenment of International Deepfake Technology Policy Texts: Taking the United States and the European Union as Examples [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 60-71.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!