[目的/意义]当前,学术评价体系已初具规模,但现有的评价方式仍存在着各自的弊端,为学术评价的科学性带来一些争议。[方法/过程]关于区块链数据的可追溯特征和时间戳技术,利用该技术的点对点传输以及分布式共识算法,在学术评价体系中流通学术币,建立学术币对等学术价值平台;利用区块链数据具有的不可篡改特征以及时间戳技术,建立学术研究的电子标签,以达到对学术研究各个步骤的全方位监测,在数据源头确保学术研究的客观性。[结果/结论]基于区块链的学术币流通系统能够应用于多种场景,能够为区块链在学术评价上的未来应用提供有益的启发。
[Purpose/Significance] At present, the academic evaluation system has begun to take shape, but the existing evaluation methods still have their own disadvantages, which bring some disputes to the scientific nature of academic evaluation. Scholars at home and abroad analyzed the current academic evaluation activities. Many theoretical assumptions were put forward to promote the development of academic evaluation. At the same time, in order to make academic evaluation more scientific, scholars put forward improvement plans from the technical aspect. However, only a specific solution to a problem in academic evaluation is proposed, and the research on academic evaluation system based on blockchain is still blank. Therefore, the paper asks this question: Is it feasible to apply blockchain technology to academic evaluation? How to build an academic evaluation system based on blockchain technology? [Method/Process] Regarding the traceability characteristics and timestamp technology of blockchain data, the peer-to-peer transmission and distributed consensus algorithm of this technology were used to circulate academic coins in the academic evaluation system, and the academic currency equivalent to academic value platform was established. Using the imtamable characteristics of blockchain data and the timestamp technology, the electronic tag of academic research is established, so as to achieve comprehensive monitoring of all steps of academic research and ensure the objectivity of academic research at the data source. Combined with block chain technology, based on block chain academic currency circulation system, and with academic currency equivalent value platform set up, block chain was applied to the academic evaluation, which puts literature related information in the block in the chain store, and at the same time encourages users to do literature review, and implement comments thumb up for academic currency of incentive mechanism, to improve the impartiality of the academic evaluation. [Results/Conclusions] The system is capable of effectively improving the problems of scattered downloads and usage and incomplete statistics in the evaluation of influence, and enhancing the fairness of peer review after publication; At the same time, it can effectively realize copyright protection and scientific research reproduction. The academic coin circulation system based on block chain can be applied to scientific evaluation, copyright protection, user credit and other scenarios, which can provide beneficial inspiration for the future application of block chain in academic evaluation. For example, the circulation rules and incentive mechanism of the academic currency system proposed in this paper are not comprehensive enough. It is necessary to further improve the circulation rules and research ideas of the academic currency system.
[1] 朱军文, 刘念才. 高校科研评价定量方法与质量导向的偏离及治理[J]. 教育研究, 2014, 35(8): 52-59.
ZHU J W, LIU N C.The deviation and governance of quantitative methods of scientific research evaluation in colleges and universities and quality orientation[J]. Education research, 2014, 35(8): 52-59.
[2] 林松, 张婉博, 张维维. 同行评议中审稿人不当行为的探讨与防范[J]. 编辑学报, 2020, 32(4): 4.
LIN S, ZHANG W B, ZHANG W W.Discussion and prevention of reviewer misconduct in peer review[J]. Journal of editing, 2020, 32(4): 4.
[3] 赵艳枝, 申林. 学术定量评价的缘起, 局限与争议——基于科学计量学的考察[J]. 高校图书馆工作, 2021, 41(4): 5.
ZHAO Y Z, SHEN L.The origin, limitation and controversy of academic quantitative evaluation: An investigation based on scientometrics[J]. University library work, 2021, 41(4): 5.
[4] 朱剑. 科研体制与学术评价之关系——从“学术乱象”根源问题说起[J]. 清华大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2015(1): 11.
ZHU J.The relationship between scientific research system and academic evaluation - From the root of "academic chaos"[J]. Journal of Tsinghua university: Philosophy and social sciences, 2015(1): 11.
[5] 杨英伦, 杨红艳. 学术评价大数据之路的推进策略研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019(5): 62-66, 152.
YANG Y L, YANG H Y.Research on the promotion strategy of academic evaluation of big data[J]. Intelligence theory and practice, 2019(5): 62-66, 152.
[6] VASEN F, LUJANO I.National systems of classification of academic journals in Latin America: Recent trends and implications for academic evaluation in the social sciences[J]. Revista mexicana de cien cias políticas y sociales, 2017, 62(231): 199-228.
[7] 陈晓峰, 云昭洁. 区块链在学术出版领域的创新应用及展望[J]. 情报工程, 2017(2): 4-12.
CHEN X F, YUN Z J.Innovative application and prospect of blockchain in academic publishing[J]. Information engineering, 2017(2): 4-12.
[8] 许洁, 王嘉昀. 基于区块链技术的学术出版信任建设[J]. 出版科学, 2017, 25(6): 6.
XU J, WANG J Y.Trust construction of academic publishing based on blockchain technology[J]. Publishing science, 2017, 25(6): 6.
[9] 王腾宇. 基于区块链的稿件处理系统的设计与实现[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2018.
WANG T Y.Design and implementation of manuscript processing system based on blockchain[D]. Dalian: Dalian university of technology, 2018.
[10] 李昊轩. 基于区块链的可修改信誉评价系统设计与分析[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2018.
LI H X.Design and analysis of a modifiable reputation evaluation system based on blockchain[D]. Xi'an: Xidian university, 2018.
[11] 郑传捷, 白禹. 浅论区块链下的科研项目管理[J]. 贵阳学院学报(自然科学版), 2018(2): 48-51.
ZHENG C J, BAI Y.On the management of scientific research projects under the blockchain[J]. Journal of Guiyang university (natural science edition), 2018(2): 48-51.
[12] NAKAMOTO S.Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system[EB/OL]. [2018-12-24]. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf,2009.
[13] 袁勇, 王飞跃. 区块链技术发展现状与展望[J]. 自动化学报, 2016, 42(4): 14.
YUAN Y, WANG F Y.Development status and prospect of blockchain technology[J]. Journal of automation, 2016, 42(4): 14.
[14] 沈鑫, 裴庆祺, 刘雪峰. 区块链技术综述[J]. 网络与信息安全学报, 2016, 2(11): 10.
SHEN X, PEI Q Q, LIU X F.A review of blockchain technology[J]. Journal of network and information security, 2016, 2(11): 10.
[15] 郭炜立, 杨宇光. 区块链与量子计算[J]. 信息安全研究, 2018, 4(6): 9.
GUO W L, YANG Y G.Blockchain and quantum computing[J]. Information security research, 2018, 4(6): 9.
[16] 徐丽丽. 浅析虚拟货币的职能与风险——以比特币为例[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2016(1): 5.
XU L L.An analysis of the functions and risks of virtual currency - Taking bitcoin as an example[J]. Research on technological economy and management, 2016(1): 5.
[17] 王永红. 数字货币技术实现框架构想[J]. 中国金融, 2016(8): 14-16.
WANG Y H.Conception of the implementation framework of digital currency technology[J]. China finance, 2016(8): 14-16.
[18] 王腾宇. 基于区块链的稿件处理系统的设计与实现[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2018.
WANG T Y.Design and implementation of a manuscript processing system based on blockchain[D]. Dalian: Dalian university of tech-nology, 2018.
[19] 吕坤, 鲍可进. 基于区块链的数字资产交易系统设计与实现[J]. 软件导刊, 2018, 17(7): 5.
LV K, BAO K J.Design and implementation of digital asset trading system based on blockchain[J]. Software guide, 2018, 17(7): 5.
[20] 杨晓晨, 张明. 比特币: 运行原理, 典型特征与前景展望[J]. 金融评论, 2014, 6(1): 16.
YANG X C, ZHANG M.Bitcoin: Operating principle, typical characteristics and prospects[J]. Financial review, 2014, 6(1): 16.
[21] 王悠然, 赵琪. “出版后评议”能当好“守门人”吗[EB/OL]. [2019-02-10].http://www.qstheory.cn/freely/2014-11/26/c_1113407508.htm.
WANG Y R, ZHAO Q. Can "post-publication review" be a good "gatekeeper"?[EB/OL]. [2019-02-10]. http://www.qstheory.cn/freely/2014-11/26/c1113407508.htm.
[22] BARTIING S, FECHER B.Blockchain for science and knowledge creation[J/OL]. [2019-02-10].https://zenodo.org/record/60223#.WlZne7eyw4k.
[23] AHIUWAIIA S.Blockchain: A new Publishing Platform[EB/OL]. [2019-01-24]. http://www.negosentro.com.
[24] DAVIS P. bitcoin: A solution to publisher authentication and usage accounting[EB/OL].[2019-01-27]. https://scholarIykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/06/01/bitcoin-a-solution-to-publisher-authentication-andusage-accounting/#comments.
[25] SVENSSON R, NIIISON H.The block is the successor to the book: A publishing proposal[EB/OL]. [2019-01-27].https://rhizome.org/editorial/2015/nov/17/the-block-is-the-successor-to-the-book-apublishing-proposal.
[26] 陈晓峰, 云昭洁. 区块链在学术出版领域的创新应用及展望[J]. 情报工程, 2017, 3(2): 9.
CHEN X F, YUN Z J.Innovative application and prospect of blockchain in academic publishing[J]. Information engineering, 2017, 3(2): 9.
