农业图书情报学刊 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 160-165.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2018.06.033

• 编辑出版 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国英文科技期刊影响力指标现状

王凤产   

  1. 河南师范大学学报编辑部,河南 新乡 453007
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-14 出版日期:2018-06-05 发布日期:2018-07-04
  • 作者简介:王凤产(1974-),男,河南师范大学学报,副编审,博士,硕士研究生导师,研究方向:科技期刊。
  • 基金资助:
    河南师范大学博士科研启动课题资助(项目编号:5102109179103);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(项目编号:18A180020);河南省重点科技公关项目(项目编号:172102310721)

Developing Status of Impact Indicators from Domestic English Sci-tech Journals

WANG Fengchan   

  1. Editorial Department of Journal of Henan Normal University, Henan Xinxiang 453007,China
  • Received:2017-11-14 Online:2018-06-05 Published:2018-07-04

摘要: 基于《中国科技期刊引证报告》,利用SPSS20.0软件分析了2104年中国英文科技期刊9个被引指标的特征及现状。主要结果如下:(1)9个被引指标均不符合正态分布,呈偏态分布;(2)列出了9个被引指标基本统计量,并绘出了他们的箱线图,直观、明了地展示了中国英文科技期刊的影响力指标特征和发展现状;(3)在过去13年间,中国英文科技期刊无论在数量和质量上都得到了大幅的提升;(4)中国英文科技期刊的学术影响力已经超过了同期中国中文科技期刊的学术影响力;但与国外主流英文科技期刊的影响力相比还有较大的差距;(5)中国英文科技期刊中也有表现不俗的期刊,应担负起中国科技期刊国际化的重任;(6)核心与非核心英文科技期刊间的差异主要在总被引频次、影响因子、即年指标、引用刊数、学科影响指标、学科扩散指标、H指标7个指标间,他引率、被引半衰期没有统计学差异(P﹥0.050)。他引率、被引半衰期不能反应期刊的学术水平。

Abstract: This paper aimed to analyze the features and developing status of 9 citation indexes from domestic English sci-tech journals in 2014 based on the CJCR. The analysis of data was conducted using SPSS 20.0. The main results were as follows: (1)The 9 citation indexes showed the abnormal distribution; (2)The features and status were visually presented by their box plots and basic statistics; (3)The past 13 years had witnessed the incredible process of domestic English sci-tech journals in terms of both quantity and quality; (4)The quality of academic papers from domestic English sci-tech journals had surpassed that of domestic Chinese sci-tech during the same period, but there was still a big gap compared with the influence of foreign mainstream English sci-tech journals; (5)Some China English sci-tech journals in the forefront can be good models to move toward internationalization with going-global expectations; (6)Between the key and non-key English sci-tech journals, their differences were mainly 10 points, including total cited number, impact factor, immediacy index, number of citing journals, discipline influence index, discipline diffusion index, H indexes, while there were no statistic difference (P<0.050) in its-citatio, cited half-life. The journals' academic level cannot be revealed by the its-citatio and cited half-life.

中图分类号: 

  • G237.5

引用本文

王凤产. 中国英文科技期刊影响力指标现状[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2018, 30(6): 160-165.

WANG Fengchan. Developing Status of Impact Indicators from Domestic English Sci-tech Journals[J]. , 2018, 30(6): 160-165.