Literature study

Analysis of Chinese and American Highly Cited Researchers Based on Clarivate Analytics

Expand
  • 1. Library of Soochow University, Jiangsu Suzhou 215000, China;
    2. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Suzhou University, Jiangsu Suzhou 215000, China;
    3. Suzhou Rail Transit Group Co., Ltd, Jiangsu Suzhou 215000, China

Received date: 2016-12-19

  Online published: 2017-07-31

Abstract

The national distribution, university distribution and subject distribution, as well as the scientific cooperation of highly cited researchers in 2016 based on Clarivate Analytics were analyzed through bibliometric methods. The results showed that Chinese leading scientists, discipline construction and scientific level had made huge progress, but was still in a weak position for most of the subjects except engineering, material and chemistry compared with America. China should continue to accelerate the construction of first-class universities, first-class disciplines and first-class scientists to narrow the gap with America.

Key words: highly cited

Cite this article

ZHAO Bing1, GUO Caizheng2, QIAN Jing3 . Analysis of Chinese and American Highly Cited Researchers Based on Clarivate Analytics[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2017 , 29(7) : 75 -77 . DOI: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2017.07.016

References

[1] 张春霆.学术评价的评价[J].中国科学基金,2010,(6):328-332.
[2] 李冲.引文分析的本质与学术评价功能的条件性[J].科学学研究,2013,31(8):1 121-1 127.
[3] 叶继元.引文的本质及其学术评价功能辨析[J].中国图书馆学报,2010,36(1):35-39.
[4] 褚农农,乌云其其格,姜桂兴,等.中国大陆高被引科学家群体状况研究[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2015,(12):7-13.
[5] 张崴,王续琨.研究型大学实验室科研团队及其团队构成现状研究[J].科学与管理,2012,32(4):88-92.
Outlines

/