中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture >

2021 , Vol. 33 >Issue 10: 20 - 35

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0378

Review on the Research of Open Science at Home and Abroad in Recent Ten Years

Expand
  • 1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2. Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received date: 2021-05-14

  Online published: 2021-11-04

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] On the basis of sorting out the concepts of open science and open scholarly communication system, we analyze the current situation of open science research at home and abroad in the past ten years, compare similarities and differences between these studies, and propose research recommendations to provide theoretical references for further promoting open science research and practice in China. [Methodology/Process] Using the literature research method and the network survey method, combined with CiteSpace visualization software, we conducted visualization and measurement research on the current situation of open science research at home and abroad in the past ten years, summarized the themes =, and finally put forward the future research outlook of open science in China through the comparative analysis of the content research themes at home and abroad. [Results/Conclusions] The current open science research in China needs to further expand research perspectives, deepen theoretical systems, and strengthen empirical research. It is recommended that future domestic research strives to: (1) expand research perspectives and promote comprehensive and in-depth theoretical research; (2) delve into methodological techniques and improve open science infrastructure; (3) promote theory transformation and strengthen empirical research in open science; and (4) strengthen the promotion of the concept and call for wider participation in the open science process.

Key words： open science; open academic communication system; visualization analysis; current research focus

Cite this article

WANG Yihan, YE Yuming . Review on the Research of Open Science at Home and Abroad in Recent Ten Years[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021 , 33(10) : 20 -35 . DOI: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0378

References

[1] FALGUERAS E A, FERRER L A.Open science: Evolution of the name and the concept[J]. Anales de documentacion, 2020, 23(1): 1-11.
[2] 黄永文, 张建勇, 黄金霞, 等. 国外开放科学数据研究综述[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2013(5): 21-27.
HUANG Y W, ZHANG J Y, HUANG J X, et al.Research on the open research data[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2013(5): 21-27.
[3] SLIBAR B, ORESKI D, KLICEK B.Aspects of open data and illus-trative quality metrics: Literature review[A]//International scientific conference on economic and social development. Croatia: Varazdin development & Entrepreneurship agency, 2018: 90-99.
[4] 王译晗, 赵艳. 近十年国内外图书馆出版研究与实践述评[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(12): 136-143.
WANG Y H, ZHAO Y.Review on research and practice of library publishing at home and abroad in recent ten years[J]. Library and
5 information service, 2020, 64(12): 136-143.
[5] EMILY F.Defining and characterizing open peer review: a review of the literature[J]. Journal of scholarly publishing, 2013, 44(4): 311-326.
[6] 李麟, 朱曼曼, 左丽华. 2012年国际开放获取实践进展综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(20): 136-142.
LI L, ZHU M M, ZUO L H.Review on international developments of open access practices in 2012[J]. Library and information service, 2013, 57(20): 136-142.
[7] 黄磊, 赵延东, 何光喜. 从开放获取到开放科学的变化与挑战——基于多指标比较的文献计量分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(11): 241-251.
HUANG L, ZHAO Y D, HE G X.Knowledge mapping from open access to open science with multiple indicators: Challenges and changes[J]. Science and technology management research, 2020, 40(11): 241-251.
[8] 黄如花, 赵洋, 黄雨婷. 国际开放科学研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(1): 140-149.
HUANG R H, ZHAO Y, HUANG Y T.Research progress in the international research of open science[J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(1): 140-149.
[9] RUBEN V-S, CLARA M-F.Open science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition[J]. Journal of business research,2018(88): 428-436.
[10] 顾立平. 开放科学中的学术交流研究综述[J]. 知识管理论坛, 2013(2): 9-15.
GU L P.Review on academic exchanges on open science[J]. Knowledge management forum, 2013(2): 9-15.
[11] European commission. Open science[EB/OL].[2021-03-15]. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/open-science.
[12] 张学文, 田华, 陈劲. 开放科学及建构的制度逻辑[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2020, 42(5): 86-92.
ZHANG X W, TIAN H, CHEN J.Open science and its institutional logic[J]. Journal of dialectics of nature, 2020, 42(5): 86-92.
[13] Dasgupta P, David P A.Toward a new economics of science[J]. Research policy, 1994, 23(5): 487-521.
[14] 联合国教科文组织. 教科文组织开放科学建议书草案初稿[EB/OL].[2021-03-20]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374837_chi/PDF/374837chi.pdf.multi.
[15] NIELSEN M.Definitions of open science[EB/OL].[2021-03-20].https://lists-archive.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/2011-July/000907.html.
[16] 张学文. 开放科学的动机: 基于两部门科学家的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2014, 32(11): 1620-1629, 1722.
ZHANG X W.The motivations of open science: An empirical mea-suring for academic and industrial scientists[J]. Studies in science of science, 2014, 32(11): 1620-1629, 1722.
[17] LEONELLI S, SPICHTINGER D, PRAINSACK B.Sticks and carrots: Encouraging open science at its source[J]. Geo-geography and environment, 2015, 2(1): 12-16.
[18] SMALDINO P E, TURNER M A, KALLENS P.Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science[J]. Royal society open science, 2019, 6(8): 191249.
[19] FRIESIKE S, WIDENMAYER B, GASSMANN O, et al.Opening science: Towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry[J]. The journal of technology transfer, 2015, 40(4): 581-601.
[20] ABELE-BREHM A E, GOLLWITZER M, STEINBERG U, et al. Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing: A survey among members of the German psychological society[J]. Social psychology, 2019, 50(4): 252-260.
[21] STURMER S, OEBERST A, TROTSCHEL R, et al.Early-career researchers' perceptions of the prevalence of questionable research practices, potential causes, and open science[J]. Social psychology, 2017, 48(6): 365-371.
[22] 吴爽, 徐飞. SCIENCE 2.0: 科学活动新范式[J]. 科学学研究, 2016,34(9): 1281-1286.
WU S, XU F.SCIENCE 2.0: The new paradigm of scientific activity[J]. Studies in science of science, 2016, 34(9): 1281-1286.
[23] 武学超. 开放科学的内涵、特质及发展模式[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(20): 7-12.
WU X C.Connotation dimensions, characteristics and developmen-tal models of open science[J]. Science & technology progress and policy, 2016, 33(20): 7-12.
[24] 刘桂锋, 钱锦琳, 田丽丽. 开放科学:概念辨析、体系解析与理念探析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2018(11): 1-9.
LIU G F, QIAN J L, TIAN L L.Open science: Concept differentia-tion, system analysis and idea exploration[J]. Library tribune, 2018(11): 1-9.
[25] 陈秀娟, 张志强. 开放科学的驱动因素、发展优势与障碍[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(6): 77-84.
CHEN X J, ZHANG Z Q.The driving factors, advantages and obstacles of the open science development[J]. Library and information service, 2018, 62(6): 77-84.
[26] HENNING P C, RIBEIRO C J S, SANTOS L O B, et al. Go fair and fair principles: What do they represent for the expansion of data in open science?[J]. Em questao, 2019, 25(2): 389-412.
[27] PHILLIPS M, KNOPPERS B M.Whose commons? Data protection as a legal limit of open science[J]. Journal of law, medicine & ethics, 2019, 47(1): 106-111.
[28] WALTERS W P.Code sharing in the open science era[J]. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2020, 60(10): 4417-4420.
[29] CARTER-THOMAS S, ROWLEY-JOLIVET E.Open science note-books: New insights, new affordances[J]. Journal of pragmatics, 2017(116): 64-76.
[30] GEANGE S R, OPPEN J V, STRYDOM T, et al.Next-generation field courses: Integrating open science and online learning[J]. Ecology and evolution, 2020(11): 1-11.
[31] COOK K, CAKIRLAR C, GODDARD T, et al.Teaching open science: Published data and digital literacy in archaeology classrooms[J]. Ad-vances in archaeological practice, 2018, 6(2): 144-156.
[32] LASTHIOTAKIS H, KRETZ A, SA C.Open science strategies in research policies: A comparative exploration of Canada, the US and the UK[J]. Policy futures in education, 2015, 13(8): 968-989.
[33] 盛小平, 杨智勇. 开放科学、开放共享、开放数据三者关系解析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(17): 15-22.
SHENG X P, YANG Z Y.Analysis of the relationship among open science, open sharing and open data[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(17): 15-22.
[34] 顾立平. 科研模式变革中的数据管理服务: 实现开放获取、开放数据、开放科学的途径[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2018, 44(6): 43-58.
GU L P.Data management services in the transition of research model: an approach of implementing open access, open data and open science[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2018, 44(6): 43-58.
[35] 刘凤红, 张恬. 开放科学背景下新兴学术论文出版类型——研究要素出版[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2017(2): 138-144.
LIU F H, ZHANG T.An emerging type of scholarly articles in the open science background: Research elements publishing[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2017(2): 138-144.
[36] 王嘉昀. 面向科技出版的开放评审综述[J]. 出版科学, 2020, 28(4): 95-104.
WANG J Y.A review of open review for science and technology publishing[J]. Publishing journal, 2020, 28(4): 95-104.
[37] 赵艳, 张晓林, 郑建程. NSTL推进实施科技文献开放获取的研究与实践[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2020(9): 2-8.
ZHAO Y, ZHANG X L, ZHENG J C.NSTL's research and practice on promoting the implementation of open access to scientific and technological literature[J]. Digital library forum, 2020(9): 2-8.
[38] 张晓林. 实现开放获取支撑科技创新——有关国家和机构支持科技期刊开放出版的政策与措施[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2013, 28(3): 378-385.
ZHANG X L.Implement open access to support research and innova-tion - OA publishing policies and measures of major R & D countries and organizations[J]. Bulletin of Chinese academy of sciences, 2013, 28(3): 378-385.
[39] 张晓林. 实施公共资助科研项目研究数据开放共享的政策建议[J]. 中国科学基金, 2019, 33(1): 79-87.
ZHANG X L.Policy recommendations for public sharing of research data from publicly funded research projects[J]. Bulletin of national natural science foundation of China, 2019, 33(1): 79-87.
[40] RAIMBAULT J, CHASSET P O, COTTINEAU C, et al.Empowering open science with reflexive and spatialised indicators[J]. Environment and planning b-urban analytics and city science, 2019, 48(2): 298-313.
[41] EDELSTEIN E, PAN J Z, SOARES R, et al.Knowledge-driven intelligent survey systems towards open science[J]. New generation computing, 2020, 38(3): 397-421.
[42] LYON L, WEI J, MATTERN E.Developing the tasks-toward-trans parency (t3) model for research transparency in open science using the lifecycle as a grounding framework[J]. Library & information science research, 2020, 42(1): 100999.
[43] WEIGERBER T, GRANITZER M.Mapping platforms into a new open science model for machine learning[J]. IT-information tech-nology, 2019, 61(4):197-208.
[44] 钱力, 谢靖, 常志军, 等. 基于科技大数据的智能知识服务体系研究设计[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(1): 4-14.
QIAN L, XIE J, CHANG Z J, ZHANG D R, et al.Designing smart knowledge services with Sci-Tech big data[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2019, 3(1): 4-14.
[45] GARGIULO P.Open science, open research data and the role of IOSSG[J]. Scires-IT-scientific research and information technology, 2020(10): 53-58.
[46] SCHMIDT B, ORTH A, FRANCK G, et al.Stepping up open science training for European research[J]. Publications, 2016, 4(2): 16.
[47] ALTUNAY M, AVERY P, BLACKBURN K, et al.A science driven production cyberinfrastructure -The open science grid[J]. Journal of grid computing, 2011, 9(2): 201-218.
[48] 吴思洁, 曹钰蕾, 王欢, 等. 欧盟开放科学培训实践及其启示[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2019(1): 66-72.
WU S J, CAO Y L, WANG H, et al.The training practices of EU open science and implication[J]. Digital library forum, 2019(1): 66-72.
[49] 刘艳, 蒙绍新, 张米雪, 等. 科学资助组织推动开放获取的经验及启示——以英国研究与创新署为例[J]. 科技与出版, 2020(9): 137-143.
LIU Y, MENG S X, ZHANG M X, et al.Experiences and insights for science funding origanizations in promoting open access - The case of UK research and innovation agency[J]. Science - technology & publication, 2020(9): 137-143.
[50] 严玲艳. 荷兰国家级机构知识库联盟建设及启示[J]. 图书馆, 2019(10): 71-77.
YAN L Y.The construction and enlightenment of national institutional repositories alliance in the netherlands[J]. Library, 2019(10): 71-77.
[51] 邵曾婷, 王译晗, 叶钰铭, 等. 从开放获取到开放科学: 开放获取周的主题、内容演变与启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(14): 13-25.
SHAO Z T, WANG Y H, YE Y M, et al.From open access to open science: the theme, content evolution and enlightenment of open access week[J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(14): 13-25.
[52] MCKIERNAN E C, BOURNE P E, BROWN C T, et al. How open science helps researchers succeed[J].2016(5), elife: E16800.
[53] VICENTE-SAEZ R, GUSTAFSSON R, BRANDE L.The dawn of an open exploration era: Emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2020(156): 120037.
[54] TZANOVA S.Changes in academic libraries in the era of open science[J]. Education for information, 2020, 36(3): 281-299.
[55] 梁洁纯, 宗乾进, 黄志鸿. 开放科学背景下TOP因子及其与科技期刊学术影响力的关系——来自LIS期刊的实证研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2020(12): 1508-1514.
LIANG C J, ZONG Q J, HUANG Z H.TOP factor and its relationship with academic influence of scientific journals under the context of open science: An empirical study of LIS journals[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2020(12): 1508-1514.
[56] 王妍, 李冉, 陈银洲. 开放服务:学术期刊知识服务转型发展的突破路径[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018, 29(11): 1072-1077.
WANG Y, LI R, CHEN Y Z.Open service: A breakthrough path for the transformation and development of knowledge services in academ-ic journals[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2018, 29(11): 1072-1077.
[57] 刘春丽, 徐跃权. 开放科学和开放数据环境中专业图书馆的新角色[J]. 图书馆建设, 2014(2): 83-88.
LIU C L, XU Y Q.New roles of the professional library in the envi-ronment of open science and open data[J]. Library development, 2014(2): 83-88.
[58] 石志松. 开放科学环境下研究型图书馆的角色与职责——《LIBER开放科学路线图》解读[J]. 图书馆建设, 2019(4): 66-73.
SHI Z S.Roles and responsibilities of research libraries under the open science environment - Interpretation of LIBER open science roadmap[J]. Library development, 2019(4): 66-73.
[59] 黄金霞, 赵展一, 王昉. 从开放科学路线图分析到开放科学道路决策方法设计[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(12): 5-19.
HUANG J X, ZHAO Z Y, WANG F.Analysis on open science roadmap and design on decision-making method of open science road[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture,2020, 32(12): 5-19.
[60] 蒋冬英. 开放科学环境下的图书馆资源建设与服务创新[J]. 图书与情报, 2018(6): 106-109.
JIANG D Y.Library resources construction and service innovation under the environment of open science[J]. Library & information, 2018(6): 106-109.
[61] 洪跃, 吴萌. 开放科学环境下研究型图书馆学科服务拓展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016(23): 69-75.
HONG Y, WU M.The new expand of subject service under the environment of open science[J]. Library and information service, 2016(23): 69-75.
[62] SCHOPFEL J, AZEROUAL O, JUNGBAUER-GANS M.Research ethics, open science and CRIS[J]. Publications, 2020, 8(4): 51.
[63] MESKUS M, MARELLI L, D'AGOSTINO G. Research misconduct in the age of open science: The case of STAP stem cells[J]. Science as culture, 2017, 27(1): 1-23.
[64] 姚长青, 田瑞强. 开放科学中的数据诚信问题研究[J]. 科技与出版, 2019(1): 130-135.
YAO C Q, TIAN R Q.A study on data integrity in open science[J]. Science - technology & publicaiton, 2019(1): 130-135.
[65] Open Context.About open context[EB/OL]. [2020-04-05].https://opencontext.org/about/.
[66] DANS. Services[EB/OL].[2020-04-05]. https://dans.knaw.nl/en/about/services/services.
[67] About FOSTER.About the FOSTER portal[EB/OL]. [2020-04-05].https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/about.
[68] COS. Openness and reproducibility research practices training[EB/OL].[2020-04-05]. https://www.cos.io/services/training.
[69] 林慧岳. 论科技政策的体系结构和决策模式[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 1999(10): 24-28.
LIN H Y.On the systematic structure and decision-making model of science and technology policy[J]. Studies in dialectics of nature
70 1999(10): 24-28.
[70] National academies of sciences, engineering,medicine. Reproducibility and replicability in science[M]. Washington DC: The national academies press, 2019.
[71] HARDWICKE T E, MATHUR M B, MACDONALD K, et al.Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: Evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal cognition[J]. Royal society open science, 2018, 5(8): 180448.
[72] HARDWICKE T E, MATHUR M B, MACDONALD K, et al.Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal psychological science: an observational study[J]. Royal society open science, 2021, 8(1): 201494.
[73] 顾立平. 全球开放科学发展的比较研究: 包容性与标准化的路径[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2021(3): 32-39.
GU L P.A comparative study of global open science development: Paths of inclusiveness and standardization[J]. Digital library forum, 2021(3): 32-39.
[74] 毕达天, 曹冉, 杜小民. 科学数据共享研究现状与展望[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(24): 69-77.
BI D T, CAO R, DU X M.A summary of researches on research data sharing and development trends at home and abroad[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(24): 67-77.
[75] 胡正君, 曾文, 刘素琴, 等. 我国科研人员和期刊编辑对学术期刊开放科学数据的认知调查分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2020, 31(1): 63-70.
HU Z J, ZENG W, LIU S Q, et al.Investigation and analysis of cognition of journal editors and scientific researchers on journal open scientific data in China[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2020, 31(1): 63-70.
[76] Data intelligence[EB/OL].[2020-05-10]. http://www.data-intelligence.org/.
[77] Plan S.About plan S[EB/OL]. [2020-04-05].https://www.coalition-s.org/.
[78] European Commission.Open research Europe[EB/OL]. [2020-04-05].https://open-research-europe.ec.europa.eu/.
[79] DRYAD. How it works[EB/OL].[2020-04-05]. https://datadryad.org/stash.
[80] OPENAIRE. Open science policy platform announced[EB/OL].[2020-04-05]. https://www.openaire.eu/open-science-policy-platform.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

Editorial Board of Journal of library and information science in agriculture
Tel：(010)82109667　Fax：(010)82109667　E-mail：xuekan＠caas.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.
知识共享许可协议