Open science

Open Access Journals' Development in the Open Science Process: 2017-2020

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100020;
    2. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    3. Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received date: 2020-10-22

  Online published: 2021-01-06

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] The process of open science has affected the development of OA journals, and this paper discusses the objective of OA journals' adaptive development and the measures to take with the aim to provide references for China's journal publication. [Method/Process] This paper analyzed the development characteristics of OA journals since 2017, sorted out the internal reform factors and external pressure factors of the journals, analyzed the main challenges, and discussed the development opportunities of OA journals in the roadmap of open science, and initially considered the future open access and open science practice in China. [Results/Conclusions] OA journals occupy an important position in the process of open science, but open science is more than open access. Global OA journals have strengthened the mechanism of knowledge sharing and their knowledge utilization ability to adapt to the requirements of scientific research. But they are also subject to preprints, OA2020/PlanS, Projekt DEAL, open conversion, APC monitoring, and pressure from different stakeholders, open technology, and the value of the challenge. In the implementation of open science, OA journals should strengthen their cooperation with funders and actively explore their own open science value-added capabilities. These also serve as one of the basis for the OA transformation of publishing industry, OA game strategy adjustment of libraries and open scientific practice in China.

Cite this article

Peng Yuanyuan, Huang Jinxia, Chen Xuefei, Zhao Zhanyi . Open Access Journals' Development in the Open Science Process: 2017-2020[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020 , 32(12) : 29 -40 . DOI: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2020.12.20-0949

References

[1] 彭媛媛, 黄金霞, 陈秀娟, 等. 开放科学中研究型图书馆的角色[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2018, 38(3): 68-75, 116.
[2] 黄磊, 赵延东, 何光喜. 从开放获取到开放科学的变化与挑战——基于多指标比较的文献计量分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 11: 241-251.
[3] Sharing research data and findings relevant to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak[EB/OL]. [2020-01-31].https://wellcome.ac.uk/press-release/sharing-research-data-and-findings-relevant-novel-coronavirus-ncov-outbreak.
[4] Calling all coronavirus researchers: Keep sharing, stay open[EB/OL]. [2020-02-04].https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00307-x.
[5] Paperity-Multidisciplinary aggregator of open access journals and papers[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03].https://paperity.org/.
[6] 《GOOA 2018年OA期刊排行榜报告》发布[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03]. http://gooa.las.ac.cn/external/journal_ranking_report_2018.jsp.
[7] Springer Nature achieves new milestone in 2019 in publishing over 100, 000 OA articles in one year, and is the largest OA publisher of primary research[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03]. http://www.stm-publishing.com/springer-nature-achieves-new-milestone-in-2019-in-publishing-over-100000-oa-articles-in-one-year-and-is-the-largest-oa-publisher-of-primary-research/.
[8] Researchers' views on the present and future of scholarly communication[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03].https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/researcher-survey-2019/#.
[9] The unexpected reason researchers choose open access[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03].https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/the-unexpected-reason-researchers-choose-open-access.
[10] Study reports open peer review attracts fewer reviews, quality suffers[EB/OL].[2020-06-03].https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/07/11/open-peer-review-attracts-fewer-lower-quality-reviews-study/.
[11] BMC continues to transform peer review, cutting out waste and speeding up the process[EB/OL].[2020-06-03].https://group.springernature.com/gp/group/media/press-releases/bmc-continues-to-transform-peer-review/16349466.
[12] Plos journals now open for published peer review[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03].https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/.
[13] Nature will publish peer review reports as a trial[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03].https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00309-9.
[14] ROSS-HEULAUER T, GRGH E.Guidelines for open peer review implementation[EB/OL].[2020-06-03].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394088/.
[15] Food modelling journal: new open-access venue provides a platform for food scientists[EB/OL].[2020-06-03].https://eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-01/pp-fmj010820.php.
[16] EU set to snub hybrid open-access journals[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03].https://www.researchresearch.com/news/article/?articleId=1375694.
[17] 张智雄, 黄金霞, 陈雪飞, 等. 科技预印本库的政策动向与政策挑战[J]. 中国科学基金, 2019, 3: 219-228.
[18] Trends in preprints[EB/OL]. [2020-08-10].https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/10/trends-in-preprints.
[19] Sage publishing launches advance, a social sciences preprints service, in partnership with figshare[EB/OL]. [2020-08-10].https://figshare.com/blog/SAGE_Publishing_launches_Advance_a_social_sciences_preprints_service_in_partnership_with_Figshare/419.
[20] Springer nature journals unify their policy to encourage preprint sharing[EB/OL]. [2020-08-10].https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01493-z.
[21] Expression of interest in the large-scale implementation of open access to scholarly journals[EB/OL]. [2020-08-10].https://oa2020.org/mission/#eois.
[22] Transformation from subscription model toward OA publishing model-justice oa2020 roadmap[EB/OL]. [2020-08-10].https://www.nii.ac.jp/content/justice_en/documents/JUSTICE_OA2020roadmap-EN.pdf.
[23] Nature to join open-access Plan S, publisher says[EB/OL]. [2020-08-10].https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01066-5.
[24] VOGEL G. Elsevier journals are back online at 60 German institutions that had lost access[EB/OL]. [2020-05-07]. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/elsevier-journals-are-back-online-60-german-institutions-had-lost-access.
[25] Wiley and Projekt DEAL partner to enhance the future of scholarly research and publishing in Germany[EB/OL]. [2020-05-07].https://newsroom.wiley.com/press-release/all-corporate-news/wiley-and-projekt-deal-partner-enhance-future-scholarly-research-an.
[26] Springer nature and Germany's projekt deal finalise world's largest transformative open access agreement[EB/OL]. [2020-08-10].https://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=253040.
[27] OPENAPC[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03].https://treemaps.intact-project.org/apcdata/openapc/#journal/is_hybrid=.
[28] Plan S Price Transparency Frameworks: guidance & requirements[EB/
OL]. [2020-10-12].https://www.coalition-s.org/price-and-service-transparency-frameworks/.
[29] Subscribe to open[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03].https://www.annualreviews.org/page/subscriptions/subscribe-to-open.
[30] ACM open (ACM's transformative model for open access publication)[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03].https://libraries.acm.org/subscriptions-access/acmopen.
[31] DALLMEIER-TIESSEN S, GOERNER B, DARBY R, et al. Open access publishing-models and attributes(SOAP)[EB/OL]. [2020-10-19]. http://edoc.mpg.de/478647.
[32] UK research councils open access policy and funding[EB/OL]. [2020-11-12].https://www.ucl.ac.uk/library/open-access/research-funders/uk-research-councils-open-access-policy-and-funding.
[33] Open access policy[EB/OL]. [2020-11-12].https://wellcome.org/grant-funding/guidance/open-access-guidance/open-access-policy.
[34] DFG funding for open access[EB/OL]. [2020-11-12].https://www.dfg.de/en/research_funding/programmes/infrastructure/lis/open_access/funding_open_access/index.html.
[35] Open access publishing[EB/OL]. [2020-11-12].https://www.mpdl.mpg.de/21-specials/50-open-access-publishing.html.
[36] 本刊讯. 中国科学院和国家自然科学基金委发布开放获取政策[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2014(6): 739.
[37] 黄金霞, 陈雪飞, 沈东婧. 开放资源的利用评价研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(21): 18-23.
[38] ANDREA M, DAVID M, LUCIA C, et al.How predatory journals leak into PubMed[J]. Canadian medical association journal, 2018,190(35): E1042-E1045.
[39] ANDREA M A, A G M, LUCIA C B, et al. Predatory open access in Rehabilitation[J]. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilita-tion, 2017, 98(5): 1051-1056.
[40] The national library of medicine has quality control procedures in place, but some researchers believe additional scrutiny is necessary[EB/OL].[2020-08-10].https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/academics-raise-concerns-about-predatory-journals-on-pubmed-- 65856.
[41] Major publishers sue researchgate over copyright infringement[EB/OL].[2020-08-10].https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06945-6.
[42] Publishers threaten to remove millions of papers from research-gate[EB/OL]. [2020-08-10].https://www.nature.com/news/publishers-threaten-to-remove-millions-of-papers-from-researchgate-1.22793.
[43] 张智雄, 黄金霞, 陈雪飞, 等. 科技预印本库的政策动向与政策挑战[J]. 中国科学基金, 2019, 3: 219-228.
[44] PLOS journals now open for published peer review[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03].https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/.
[45] Math journal editors quit for open access[EB/OL]. [2020-08-10].https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/07/31/math-journal-editors-resign-start-rival-open-access-journal.
[46] Open-access journal editors resign after alleged pressure to publish mediocre papers[EB/OL]. [2020-08-10].https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/09/open-access-editors-resign-after-alleged-pressure-publish-mediocre-papers.
[47] CHAWLA D S.Open-access row prompts editorial board of Elsevier journal to resign[J]. Nature, 2019.
[48] OECD. Making open science a reality[J]. OECD science technology & industry policy papers, 2015, 25(10): 1-107.
[49] FOSTER[EB/OL]. [2020-11-10].https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/project.
[50] LACEY J, COATES R, HERINGTON M.Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: Understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers[J]. Journal of responsible innovation, 2020(8): 1-23.
[51] HOLBROOK, BRITT J. Open science, open access,the democ-ratization of knowledge[J]. Issues in science and technology, 2019(35), 3: 26-28.
[52] BERND PULVERER.Open access-or open science?[J]. The EMBO journal, 2018, 37: 1-3.
[53] AYRIS P, BERNAL I, CAVALLI V, et al.LIBER open science roadmap[EB/OL].[2020-08-22].https://zenodo.org/record/1303002#.WzsCdtUzaM8.
[54] PHILIP H.The deal with DEAL for open access: the recent publish-and-read deals have increased momentum for open-access publishing but may not solve the challenge of open science[J]. EMBO reports, 2020, 21(1).
[55] HASSAN M, AARTHI R, BENJAMIN M G, et al.Ten simple rules for cultivating open science and collaborative R&D[J]. PLOS com-putational biology, 2013, 9(9).
[56] 石志松. 欧洲研究图书馆协会数字人文发展策略探析[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2019, 5: 24-31.
[57] FRANKENHUIS W E, DANIEL N.Open science is liberating and can foster creativity[J]. Perspectives on psychological ence, 2018, 13(4): 439-447.
[58] LAKE, BENJAMIN.Can open science save us from a solar-driven monsoon?[J]. Journal of space weather and space climate, 2016, 6: 7.
[59] DICKEL, SASCHA, FRANZEN, MARTINA.Digital inclusion: the social implications of open science[J]. Ztschrift für soziologie, 2015, 44(5).
[60] THOMAS R.Improving evidence quality for organisational change management through open science[J]. Journal of organizational change management (ahead-of-print) DOI:10.1108/JOCM-05-2019-0127.
[61] 黄金霞, 赵展一, 王昉. 从开放科学路线图分析到开放科学道路决策方法设计[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020(12): 5-19.
[62] CNRS roadmap for open science[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://www.science-ouverte.cnrs.fr/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/CNRS_Roadmap_Open_Science_18nov2019.pdf.
[63] 武虹, 陈雪飞, 王昉, 等. 全球OA期刊出版大数据监测方法[J]. 现代情报, 2019, 39(2): 145-151.
[64] 黄金霞, 赵展一, 王昉, 等. 国际反思背景下我国科研群体OA发展需求调查[J].现代情报, 2020: 44-53.
[65] 黄金霞, 王昉, 陈雪飞, 等. 从 GoOA 到 OAinONE: 开放资源的发展与再利用[J]. 农业图书情报, 2019, 31(1): 4-13.
Outlines

/