农业图书情报学刊 ›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 53-58.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2015.11.013

• 文献研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国理工科大学科学合作网络图谱分析

李娜   

  1. 华南理工大学图书馆,广东 广州 510640
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-29 出版日期:2015-11-05 发布日期:2015-11-06
  • 作者简介:李娜,女,馆员,硕士,研究方向:为科技查新与信息技术咨询。
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(项目编号:2014GM07)

Diagram Analysis on the Science Collaboration Network Among Universities of Science and Engineering

LI Na   

  1. Library, South China University of Technology, Guangdong Guangzhou 510640, China
  • Received:2015-06-29 Online:2015-11-05 Published:2015-11-06

摘要: 为了揭示中国理工科大学间科学合作的总体现状。选择中国大学排行榜百强中的36所理工科大学为研究对象,基于SCIE数据库检索出2013年理工科大学之间的合著论文数据,分别建立论文合著频率矩阵和Salton指标矩阵。然后借助Ucinet和Netdraw软件绘制理工科大学间科学合作的可视化网络图谱。研究发现:清华大学无论是论文发表总量还是合作总量都高于其它理工科大学,并在网络图谱中与其它大学形成很强的合作关系;地域相近性是影响理工科大学间科学合作关系强弱的主要因素;各理工科大学归属于不同块模型,占据了网络的不同位置,具有不同的交互模式和角色功能。

关键词: 理工科大学, 科学合作, 社会网络分析, 可视化

Abstract: To reveal the current status of scientific cooperation among universities of science and engineering, the cooperation frequency matrix and Salton index matrix were found based on the data of co-authored papers in universities of science and engineering in 2013 from the SCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded) database. The investigated universities composed of thirty six top100 ranking universities of science and engineering in China. The cooperation network was visualized by Ucinet and Netdraw. Results showed both the number of papers published and the number of co-authored papers in Tsinghua University was more than other universities of science and engineering; regional proximity was the main factors to affect cooperative strength; these universities of science and engineering had different interactive modes and role functions because each of them belonged to a different block model and occupied a different position.

Key words: University of science and engineering

中图分类号: 

  • G350

引用本文

李娜. 中国理工科大学科学合作网络图谱分析[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2015, 27(11): 53-58.

LI Na. Diagram Analysis on the Science Collaboration Network Among Universities of Science and Engineering[J]. , 2015, 27(11): 53-58.